Society Guidelines
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

This overview provides a guideline for the management of stable ischemic heart disease. It represents the work of a primary and secondary panel of participants from across Canada who achieved consensus on behalf of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. The suggestions and recommendations are intended to be of relevance to primary care and specialist physicians with an emphasis on rational deployment of diagnostic tests, expedited implementation of long- and short-term medical therapy, timely consideration of revascularization, and practical follow-up measures.

Résumé

Cette vue d’ensemble offre des recommandations sur la prise en charge de la cardiopathie ischémique stable. Elle représente le travail d’un panel principal et d’un panel secondaire de participants de l’ensemble du Canada qui ont atteint un consensus au nom de la Société canadienne de cardiologie. Les suggestions et les recommandations doivent avoir rapport avec les soins primaires et les médecins spécialistes tout en insistant sur l’utilisation rationnelle des examens diagnostiques, la mise en œuvre rapide d’un traitement médical à court et à long terme, la prise en considération en temps opportun de la revascularisation et les mesures concrètes de suivi.

Section snippets

Establishing Diagnosis and Prognosis

In patients with symptoms suggestive of SIHD, the probability of having obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is primarily obtained using a thorough history. Classically, angina is described as a dull retrosternal discomfort/ache/heaviness that might or might not radiate to the jaw, neck, shoulders or arms, is provoked by exertion or emotional stress, and is relieved within 5 minutes of rest or nitroglycerine use.2 However, nonclassical symptoms are common, particularly among diabetic

Initiation of Medical Treatment in Patients With Established CAD

Therapy for SIHD involves a combination of approaches to improve quality of life by minimizing or abolishing symptoms, and to improve prognosis by preventing myocardial infarction (MI) and premature death. Medical management can be implemented more expeditiously in most settings than can the steps required in anticipation of possible revascularization. However, expeditious revascularization therapy might be considered in parallel based on prognostic features of the diagnostic tests as discussed

Consideration of Revascularization Therapy

Revascularization therapy is also indicated to improve symptoms or quality of life and/or to reduce the risk of MI and premature death. There is no controversy regarding the need to explore revascularization in SIHD patients with inadequate symptom relief, suboptimal quality of life, or emergence of acute chest pain syndromes while using medical therapy. However, because of the success of available medical therapy, and new forms of medical and revascularization therapies, categorical statements

Provision of Appropriate Clinical Follow-up

The most appropriate clinical follow-up in patients with SIHD is difficult to clearly define because of the paucity of robust research. However, there is a need for regular communication between primary care practitioners and specialists expert in the provision of chronic disease care for such patients.3 Follow-up visits should include a focused history, physical examination, and clinically appropriate laboratory testing, with an emphasis on ensuring optimal risk factor control. The history

Summary

SIHD is common, requires expeditious diagnosis, implementation of medical therapies, correction of CV risk factors, timely consideration of revascularization options, and appropriate follow-up. This Canadian perspective provides a practical approach applicable in most practice settings for optimization of longevity and quality of life, with ample regard for rational resource utilization.

References (143)

  • G.B. Mancini et al.

    Prognostic importance of coronary anatomy and left ventricular ejection fraction despite optimal therapy: assessment of residual risk in the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation Trial

    Am Heart J

    (2013)
  • G.B. Mancini et al.

    Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial. Coronary anatomy versus ischemia

    J Am Coll Cardiol Interv

    (2014)
  • J.A. Panza et al.

    Inducible myocardial ischemia and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2013)
  • A.Y. Tashakkor et al.

    The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Can J Cardiol

    (2012)
  • M.K. Natarajan et al.

    Canadian Cardiovascular Society position statement on radiation exposure from cardiac imaging and interventional procedures

    Can J Cardiol

    (2013)
  • S. Juul-Moller et al.

    Double-blind trial of aspirin in primary prevention of myocardial infarction in patients with stable chronic angina pectoris. The Swedish Angina Pectoris Aspirin Trial (SAPAT) Group

    Lancet

    (1992)
  • M.H. Al-Mallah et al.

    Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2006)
  • J.J. McMurray et al.

    Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • B. Pitt et al.

    The QUinapril Ischemic Event Trial (QUIET): evaluation of chronic ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and preserved left ventricular function

    Am J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • A.L. Pipe et al.

    Smoking cessation and the cardiovascular specialist: Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Paper

    Can J Cardiol

    (2011)
  • V. Dzavik et al.

    Long-term survival in 11 661 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in the era of stenting: a report from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators

    Am Heart J

    (2001)
  • R.H. Jones et al.

    Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1996)
  • M.J. Mack et al.

    Bypass versus drug-eluting stents at three years in SYNTAX patients with diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2011)
  • S. Verma et al.

    Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol

    (2013)
  • M.E. Favarato et al.

    Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial

    Int J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • S.J. Pocock et al.

    Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three-year follow-up in the RITA-2 trial. Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2000)
  • S. Yusuf et al.

    Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • W.O. Myers et al.

    Improved survival of surgically treated patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease and severe angina pectoris. A report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1989)
  • A.P. Banning et al.

    Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease: comparison of outcomes with cardiac surgery and paclitaxel-eluting stents

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2010)
  • S.N. Hoffman et al.

    A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight year outcomes

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2003)
  • N.W. Niles et al.

    Survival of patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease after surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of a large regional prospective study. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2001)
  • W.S. Weintraub et al.

    Outcome of coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • Heart & Stroke Foundation. Statistics Guidelines. Heart Disease. Available at:...
  • P. Tanser

    2000 revision of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society 1997 Consensus Conference on the evaluation and management of chronic ischemic heart disease

    Can J Cardiol

    (2000)
  • S.D. Fihn et al.

    2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: Executive summary a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    Circulation

    (2012)
  • G. Montalescot et al.

    2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease

    Eur Heart J

    (2013)
  • D.H. Fitchett et al.

    Assessment and manangement of acute coronary syndromes (ACS): a Canadian perspective on current guideline-recommended treatment – Part 1: non-ST-segment elevation ACS

    Can J Cardiol

    (2011)
  • M. McGillion et al.

    Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines

    Can J Cardiol

    (2012)
  • Canadian Cardiovascular Society 1999 consensus conference

    Can J Cardiol

    (2000)
  • Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada

    Can J Diabetes

    (2013)
  • Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP). 2014 Recommendations. Available at:...
  • Wait Time Alliance. Wait-time benchmarks for cardiovascular services and procedures in Wait Time Alliance for Timely...
  • Choosing Wisely. American College of Cardiology. Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. Available at:...
  • C.A. Henrikson et al.

    Chest pain relief by nitroglycerin does not predict active coronary artery disease

    Ann Intern Med

    (2003)
  • D.B. Pryor et al.

    Value of the history and physical in identifying patients at increased risk for coronary-artery disease

    Ann Intern Med

    (1993)
  • R.J. Gibbons et al.

    ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • G.A. Diamond et al.

    Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical-diagnosis of coronary-artery disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1979)
  • B.R. Chaitman et al.

    Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary-artery disease in patient subsets (CASS)

    Circulation

    (1981)
  • V.Y. Cheng et al.

    Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography. Results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM)

    Circulation

    (2011)
  • Cited by (126)

    • Comparing Costs of Noninvasive Cardiac Diagnostic Tests—a Population-Based Study

      2024, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The disclosure information of the authors and reviewers is available from the CCS on their guidelines library at www.ccs.ca.

    This statement was developed following a thorough consideration of medical literature and the best available evidence and clinical experience. It represents the consensus of a Canadian panel comprised of multidisciplinary experts on this topic with a mandate to formulate disease-specific recommendations. These recommendations are aimed to provide a reasonable and practical approach to care for specialists and allied health professionals obliged with the duty of bestowing optimal care to patients and families, and can be subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and as practice patterns evolve. The statement is not intended to be a substitute for physicians using their individual judgment in managing clinical care in consultation with the patient, with appropriate regard to all the individual circumstances of the patient, diagnostic and treatment options available and available resources. Adherence to these recommendations will not necessarily produce successful outcomes in every case.

    View full text