The effects of teamwork and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2007.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: While cancer screening is generally increasing in the U.S., colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains low. Most CRC screening interventions focus either on patients or individual clinicians without examining the office context in which CRC screening is implemented. This study examines whether primary care practices that involve staff in general forms of health education have higher CRC screening rates than practices that do not. Methods: Cross-sectional data from 22 New Jersey and Pennsylvania family medicine practices were analyzed. Data include chart audits for 795 men and women eligible for CRC screening (age 50–70) and practice information surveys for each practice. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine CRC screening correlates. Results: Overall, 31.3% (n = 249) of patients received CRC screening. Practices that reported using nursing or health educator staff to provide behavioral counseling to patients on topics such as diet, exercise or tobacco use were significantly more likely to also have higher CRC screening rates (z = 7.30, p < 0.0001). Their patients had 2.96 times increased odds of CRC screening than those in other practices (95% C.I., 2.21–3.96). Reminder system use was also associated with higher CRC screening (z = 4.96, p < 0.0001). In practices that used reminder systems, patients had 2.57 times increased odds of CRC screening than others (95% C.I., 1.77–3.74). Conclusions: These findings suggest that interventions to achieve better CRC screening rates do not need to focus solely on CRC. Higher CRC rates may be achieved by capitalizing on the enhancing contributions of non-physician practice members providing more general health behavior change patient education.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of new cancer cases and cancer death for men and women in the United States [1]. In 2006, there were an estimated 148,610 new cases and 55,170 deaths from colorectal cancer [1]. Providing evidence based preventive screening for colon cancer has been identified as a priority area for national action by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) [2]. Preventive screening for CRC in the forms of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) have been shown to reduce mortality in randomized control trials and case controlled studies [3], [4]. Appropriate testing could have saved more than half of the 55,170 people expected to die in 2006 from CRC [1].

A number of recent studies [5], [6], [7] aimed at improving CRC screening in primary care practices directly target physicians for CRC clinical interventions examining their attitudes [6], [7] and whether physicians discuss CRC screening with their patients [5]. Although, primary care physician counseling of patients has been positively associated with CRC screening [6], [8], this approach is inadequate due to multiple competing demands and priorities [9], [10], [11]. Increasingly traditional models of primary care practice are being criticized as too physician centric and resulting in care that is mostly reactive and often fragmented [12]. Several reports including the IOM's Crossing the Quality Chasm [13] and the Future of Family Medicine [12] describe optimum health care settings as being “responsive and prospective” practices that include a teamwork approach where multidisciplinary teams and not individual clinicians are the sources of care. Nevertheless, few studies examine the impact of involving other health care team members on CRC screening [14].

There is a growing literature that suggests that office characteristics such as office practice structure [15], [16] and competing demands [17] are associated with cancer screening [15], [16], and several new models of primary care advocate the use of teams in the delivery of health care [12], [13]. The purpose of this paper is to determine if the inclusion of office staff in general behavioral counseling activities has the added benefit of enhancing rates of colorectal cancer screening.

Section snippets

Methods

We used cross-sectional data collected at baseline, from April 2003 through December 2004, from a quality improvement intervention study, Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA). The ULTRA study used a multi-method assessment process [18] to inform a facilitated team-building intervention [19] aimed at improving guideline adherence for multiple chronic diseases among 60 practices in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. For this analysis, 22 suburban practices were selected that had

Results

In the 22 practices charts were audited for 795 patients eligible for CRC screening. Over half (55%) were men. The average patient age was 59.30 (S.D. = 5.84). Of the patients eligible for screening, 249 (31.3%) had received appropriate screening, with practice screening rates ranging from 10.3% to 64.9% (median of 31.9%). Twenty out of 22 practices were group practices (91%) with a heavy Caucasian patient panel (average 86%). Most practices reported the majority of their patients had commercial

Discussion

Reports such as IOM's Crossing the Quality Chasm [13] and the Future of Family Medicine [12] identify team approaches and more functional offices as important variables for improving outcomes in the primary care setting. In this study, we examined three generic organizational features to determine if they would also translate into higher rates for a non-targeted recommendation, that of CRC screening. Two of these features; the use of nurse or health educator for health behavior counseling and

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported through grants from the National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute (R01 HL70800) and the New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research (03-40-CCR-S0). It was conducted in conjunction with the New Jersey Family Medicine Research Network (NJFMRN), the Eastern Pennsylvania Inquiry Collaborative Network (EPICnet) and the Cancer Institute of New Jersey's Informatics and Primary Care Research Network Shared Resources. We thank the reviewers for their advice and thought provoking

References (39)

  • J.S. Mandel et al.

    The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2000)
  • P.A. Newcomb et al.

    Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1992)
  • K.R. Yabroff et al.

    Physician recommendations for follow-up of positive fecal occult blood tests

    Med Care Res Rev

    (2005)
  • G.S. Dulai et al.

    Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care setting

    Cancer

    (2004)
  • C.R. Jaen et al.

    Tailoring tobacco counseling to the competing demands in the clinical encounter

    J Fam Pract

    (2001)
  • C.R. Jaen et al.

    Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services

    J Fam Pract

    (1994)
  • C.R. Jaen et al.

    Missed opportunities for prevention: smoking cessation counseling and the competing demands of practice

    J Fam Pract

    (1997)
  • J.C. Martin et al.

    The Future of Family Medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community

    Ann Fam Med

    (2004)
  • Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health...
  • Cited by (41)

    • Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion

      2018, Preventive Medicine Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most relied on patient-level quantitative data from clinical information systems (Singh et al., 2009a; Weiss et al., 2013). Few have studied challenges in screening care delivery (O'Malley et al., 2015), particularly referral of patients with abnormal fecal tests for diagnostic colonoscopy (Hudson et al., 2007; Partin et al., 2015). Investigators partnered with the healthcare system to understand how to optimize processes within and across clinics to enhance FIT, the preferred screening modality of the system.

    • The association between chronic disease and physical disability among female Medicaid beneficiaries 18-64 years of age

      2013, Disability and Health Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, evidence-based practice systems can effectively increase the delivery of preventive and primary care. Such systems may include electronic health records, client-based interventions (such as client reminders, small media, one-on-one education), and provider-based interventions (such as provider reminders of when clients are due for screening and provider assessment and feedback).40–46 Finally, there is a need for community-based health education and promotion programs to raise awareness of women of the value of health maintenance and early detection of disease.

    • Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices

      2012, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further work is required to establish a benchmark for a patient number that results in better preventive care. Physicians have reported a need for reminder systems to support their preventive care,3,5 and these tools have been associated with improved care in several studies.7,8,27 We found that the presence of an electronic reminder system was positively associated with prevention scores.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Support: This research was supported through grants from the National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute (R01 HL70800), the New Jersey Commission on Cancer Research (03-40-CCR-S0), and the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA112387).

    View full text