ACOG/SMFM ConsensusACOG/SMFM obstetric care consensusSafe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery
Section snippets
Background
In 2011, 1 in 3 women who gave birth in the United States did so by cesarean delivery.1 Even though the rates of primary and total cesarean delivery have plateaued recently, there was a rapid increase in cesarean rates from 1996 through 2011 (Figure 1). Although cesarean delivery can be lifesaving for the fetus, the mother, or both in certain cases, the rapid increase in the rate of cesarean births without evidence of concomitant decreases in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises
Balancing risks and benefits
Childbirth by its very nature carries potential risks for the woman and her baby, regardless of the route of delivery. The National Institutes of Health has commissioned evidence-based reports over recent years to examine the risks and benefits of cesarean and vaginal delivery3 (Table 1). For certain clinical conditions–such as placenta previa or uterine rupture–cesarean delivery is firmly established as the safest route of delivery. However, for most pregnancies, which are low-risk, cesarean
Indications for primary cesarean
There is great regional variation by state in the rate of total cesarean delivery across the United States, ranging from a low of 23% to a high of nearly 40% (Figure 2). Variation in the rates of nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean births indicates that clinical practice patterns affect the number of cesarean births performed. There also is substantial hospital-level variation. Studies have shown a 10-fold variation in the cesarean delivery rate across hospitals in the United States,
Definition of abnormal first-stage labor
The first stage of labor has been historically divided into the latent phase and the active phase based on the work by Friedman in the 1950s and beyond. The latent phase of labor is defined as beginning with maternal perception of regular contractions.17 On the basis of the 95th percentile threshold, historically, the latent phase has been defined as prolonged when it is >20 hours in nulliparous women and >14 hours in multiparous women.18 The active phase of labor has been defined as the point
References (119)
- et al.
Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2008) - et al.
Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial; term breech trial collaborative group
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2004) - et al.
Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011) - et al.
Cesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy
Lancet
(2003) The graphic analysis of labor
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1954)- et al.
Active-phase labor arrest: oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 hours
Obstet Gynecol
(1999) - et al.
Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum
Obstet Gynecol
(2001) - et al.
The maternal-fetal medicine units cesarean registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes; National Institute of Child Health And Human Development, maternal-fetal medicine units network
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2004) - et al.
The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1991) - et al.
Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development maternal-fetal medicine units network
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2009)
When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia
Am J Obstet Gynecol
How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling
Am J Obstet Gynecol
The scalp stimulation test: a clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood sampling
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of scalp stimulation with scalp blood pH sampling
Obstet Gynecol
Saline amnioinfusion for relief of repetitive variable decelerations: a prospective randomized study
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Prophylactic intrapartum amnioinfusion: a randomized clinical trial
Am J Obstet Gynecol
A prospective randomized study of saline solution amnioinfusion
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Prophylactic amnioinfusion improves outcome of pregnancy complicated by thick meconium and oligohydramnios
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Fetal heart monitoring and ultrasound in the management of placental abruption
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
A comprehensive program to improve safety for pregnant women and fetuses in motor vehicle crashes: a preliminary report
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis
Obstet Gynecol
Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies
Obstet Gynecol
Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol
Obstet Gynecol
Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011
Pediatrics
Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?
Am J Perinatol
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 191. AHRQ publication no. 10-E003
Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized term breech trial; term breech trial 3-month follow-up collaborative group
JAMA
Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term: maternal health study group of the Canadian perinatal surveillance system
CMAJ
Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development maternal-fetal medicine units network
Obstet Gynecol
The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals: reducing variation may address quality and cost issues
Health Aff (Millwood)
Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002
Am J Public Health
Rise in “no indicated risk” primary cesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: cross-sectional analysis
BMJ
Contribution of excess weight gain during pregnancy and macrosomia to the cesarean delivery rate, 1990-2000
Pediatrics
Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate
Obstet Gynecol
An objective approach to the diagnosis and management of abnormal labor
Bull N Y Acad Med
Amniotomy and the course of labor
Obstet Gynecol
Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes: consortium on safe labor
Obstet Gynecol
Cited by (614)
Failed induction of labor
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyIntrapartum ultrasound visualization of the Odon device during operative vaginal delivery
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyEUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PERINATAL MEDICINE (EAPM) EUROPEAN MIDWIVES ASSOCIATION (EMA): Joint position statement: Caesarean delivery rates at a country level should be in the 15-20 % range
2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyOperative delivery in the second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySafety and efficacy of the OdonAssist inflatable device for assisted vaginal birth: the BESANCON ASSIST study
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The information reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued, is subject to change, and should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure. Variations in practice may be warranted based on the needs of the individual patient, resources, and limitations unique to the institution or type of practice.
The authors report no conflict of interest.
This article is being published concurrently in the March 2014 issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology (Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693-711).