Major articleSurgical site infection prevention following total hip arthroplasty in Australia: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Section snippets
Methods
There are several steps preceding the actual cost-effectiveness analysis: choosing infection prevention strategies for evaluation (comparators), designing the decision model, and identifying parameters to inform model health states. The cost-effectiveness analysis consists of a baseline analysis using point estimates of parameter values, followed by analysis considering uncertainty surrounding model parameters, as well as scenario analyses.
Baseline analysis
Table 2 illustrates outcomes for the baseline comparator and alternative strategies. Compared with baseline AP, the use of additional ABC in all cemented primary THAs would prevent 46 deep SSI and save $3,909 for each QALY gained and hence be cost saving. Not using AP would increase costs by approximately $1.5 million for losing over 163 QALYs. If LOR were used in all primary THAs, costs would increase by approximately $4.6 million, and 127 QALYs are lost. Using AP + ABC clearly dominates the
Interpretation of findings
In the baseline and uncertainty analysis, AP + ABC clearly dominated the other 2 strategies (No AP, AP + LOR), which both showed a substantial increase in deep SSI cases, resulting in higher mortality and higher costs. If these strategies were implemented, health care providers would absurdly incur costs to harm patients. These results also verified the cost-effectiveness of routinely administering preoperative AP in primary THAs as an infection prevention measure in the absence of using
Conclusion
This project contributes to a framework for decision making in infection control in Australia and possibly other countries with comparable structures. The routine use of preoperative AP is cost-effective and should be continued. Resource allocation can be further improved by additionally using antibiotic-impregnated cement in all cemented primary THAs. Laminar air operating theaters proved harmful to patients as well as being costly. Based on this evidence, their use is not recommended.
References (47)
- et al.
Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach
Orthop Traumatol
(2010) - et al.
Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs
Am J Infect Control
(2009) - et al.
Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals
J Hosp Infect
(2005) - et al.
The cost-effectiveness of routine follow-up after primary total hip arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(2010) - et al.
Trends in mortality, complications, and demographics for primary hip arthroplasty in the United States
Int Orthop
(2009) - et al.
Prosthetic-Joint Infections
N Engl J Med
(2004) - et al.
Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(2005) - et al.
The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005) - et al.
The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
(2002) - et al.
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in total hip replacement: a systematic review
Health Technol Assess
(1999)
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Preoperative hair removal: a systematic review
J Periop Pract
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Antibiotics are effective in preventing infection from surgery to the thigh and other long bone fractures
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement
Acta Orthop
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Preoperative bathing or showering with skin antiseptics to prevent surgical site infection
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Reducing the risk of deep wound infection in primary joint arthroplasty with antibiotic bone cement
Orthopedics
Perioperative intranasal mupirocin for the prevention of surgical-site infections: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
Hair removal policies in clean surgery: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
Evidence of control and prevention of surgical site infection by shoe covers and private shoes: a systematic literature review
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem
Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
Cited by (0)
Supported by the Orthopaedic Research Unit at the Prince Charles Hospital and the Centre for Healthcare Related Infection Surveillance and Prevention (CHRISP) in Brisbane, Australia.
Conflicts of interest: None to report.