Evidence-based imaging evaluation of the cervical spine in trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-5149(03)00024-8Get rights and content

Section snippets

Evidence-based analysis and literature review

A MEDLINE search was performed using PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) for original research publications discussing the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of imaging strategies for the cervical spine. Clinical predictors of cervical spine fracture were also included in the literature search. The search covered the years 1966 to March 2002. The search strategy employed different combinations of the following terms: (1) cervical spine, (2) radiography OR imaging OR

Epidemiology

Cervical spine fractures occur in approximately 10,000 individuals per year in the United States, most the result of blunt trauma [3], [4]. Among patients with a fracture, approximately one in three sustain severe neurologic injury [3], [5]. Unfortunately, fractures of the cervical spine may not be clinically obvious. Patients may be neurologically intact initially but, if not treated appropriately and promptly, may progress to severe neurologic compromise [6]. Delayed onset of paralysis occurs

Selection of subjects for imaging

The low yield of cervical imaging has prompted several investigators to attempt to identify clinical factors that could be used to predict cervical spine fracture. Early studies of this question were largely level 3 investigations consisting of unselected case series. In 1988, Roberge and colleagues [21] studied 467 consecutive subjects who underwent cervical spine radiography and found that subjects with cervical discomfort or tenderness were more likely to have a fracture than were subjects

Selection of imaging strategy

In subjects in whom imaging is appropriate, the next issue is determination of what imaging modality should be used. For decades, the standard imaging protocol for the cervical spine in trauma patients has been radiography; however, more recently, CT has been proposed as an alternate imaging strategy, particularly in subjects who are also scheduled to undergo head CT.

Summary

Despite the relatively low frequency of cervical spine fractures in trauma patients, tremendous resources are expended on the use of imaging to exclude fracture. Some level 2 evidence can direct the selection of subjects for imaging and optimization of the imaging strategy. A suggested algorithm for evidence-based cervical spine imaging is shown in Fig. 1. This algorithm is based on the sequential assessment of two questions: (1) Is imaging necessary? (2) If imaging is necessary, what is the

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (52)

  • Blackmore C., Cummings P. Observational studies in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol, in...
  • M.B Bracken et al.

    Incidence of acute traumatic hospitalized spinal cord injury in the United States, 1970–1977

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1981)
  • P.R Fine et al.

    Spinal cord injury: an epidemiologic perspective

    Paraplegia

    (1979)
  • W.A Rogers

    Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine: an end-result study

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1957)
  • J.W Davis et al.

    The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • B.D Gerrelts et al.

    Delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries

    J Trauma

    (1991)
  • D.C Reid et al.

    Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures

    J Trauma

    (1987)
  • M.J DeVivo et al.

    Trends in spinal cord injury demographics and treatment outcomes between 1973 and 1986

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1992)
  • W.D Kalsbeek et al.

    The National Head and Spinal Cord Injury Survey: major findings

    J Neurosurg

    (1980)
  • C.C Blackmore et al.

    Cervical spine imaging in patients with trauma: determination of fracture risk to optimize use

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • F Lomoschitz et al.

    Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 years old and older: epidemiological analysis regarding the effects of age and injury mechanism on distribution, type, and stability of injury

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2002)
  • C.C Blackmore et al.

    Variability in the practice of emergency radiology

    Emergency Radiology

    (2000)
  • M Harris et al.

    Evaluation of the cervical spine in the polytrauma patient

    Spine

    (2000)
  • S.E Mirvis et al.

    Protocol-driven radiologic evaluation of suspected cervical spine injury: efficacy study

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • D.L Kreipke et al.

    Reliability of indications for cervical spine films in trauma patients

    J Trauma

    (1989)
  • I Stiell et al.

    Variation in emergency department use of cervical spine radiography for alert, stable trauma patients

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1997)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Spine and Lower Back Pain

      2011, Problem Solving in Neuroradiology
    • Imaging of Spine Trauma

      2011, Problem Solving in Neuroradiology
    • Cervical spine injuries

      2006, Feuillets de Radiologie
    • Evidence-based approach to using CT in spinal trauma

      2003, European Journal of Radiology
    • Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: A systematic review

      2012, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      This suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule is superior when the rule is used in its entirety. The findings of this review are consistent with a previous meta-analysis14 and 2 literature reviews.30,31 However, our review used a larger and more sensitive search strategy, which resulted in a larger number of primary studies identified for inclusion.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text