Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 27, Issue 6, November–December 2002, Pages 867-886
Addictive Behaviors

Harm reduction approaches to alcohol use: Health promotion, prevention, and treatment

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00294-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Harm reduction approaches to alcohol problems have endured a controversial history in both the research literature and the popular media. Although several studies have demonstrated that controlled drinking is possible and that moderation-based treatments may be preferred over abstinence-only approaches, the public and institutional views of alcohol treatment still support zero-tolerance. After describing the problems with zero-tolerance and the benefits of moderate drinking, the research literature describing prevention and intervention approaches consistent with a harm reduction philosophy are presented. Literature is reviewed on universal prevention programs for young adolescents, selective and indicated prevention for college students, moderation-based self-help approaches, prevention and interventions in primary care settings, pharmacological treatments, and psychosocial approaches with moderation goals. Overall, empirical studies have demonstrated that harm reduction approaches to alcohol problems are at least as effective as abstinence-oriented approaches at reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences. Based on these findings, we discuss the importance of individualizing alcohol prevention and intervention to accommodate the preferences and needs of the targeted person or population. In recognizing the multifaceted nature of behavior change, harm reduction efforts seek to meet the individual where he or she is at and assist that person in the direction of positive behavior change, whether that change involves abstinence, moderate drinking, or the reduction of alcohol-related harm. The limitations of harm reduction and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Introduction

The moral and disease models of alcoholism have dominated the prevention and treatment of alcohol problems since the early 1930s (Jellinek, 1960). According to these models, abstinence is considered the only alternative to excessive drinking and individuals who drink to excess are viewed as either immoral or diseased. The prevention of excessive drinking within this framework advocates for a zero-tolerance, or “just say no,” approach to alcohol. Conversely, harm reduction offers a pragmatic approach to alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems based on three core objectives: (1) to reduce harmful consequences associated with alcohol use; (2) to provide an alternative to zero-tolerance approaches by incorporating drinking goals (abstinence or moderation) that are compatible with the needs of the individual; and (3) to promote access to services by offering low-threshold alternatives to traditional alcohol prevention and treatment.

Section snippets

Moderate drinking

Almost 30 years have elapsed since the proposition of moderate drinking as a possible treatment option sparked a great debate between biological, behavioral, and spiritual views of alcohol problems Marlatt, 1983, Marlatt et al., 1993. At the center of this debate was the pioneering research of Mark and Linda Sobell Sobell & Sobell, 1973, Sobell & Sobell, 1976, who incorporated a moderate drinking goal as part of an inpatient treatment program for chronic male alcoholics. The results from these

Harm reduction approaches

In a recent report, the World Health Organization (2001) made the following recommendation for the prevention and treatment of alcohol dependence:

The prevention of alcohol dependence needs to be seen within the context of the broader goal of preventing and reducing alcohol-related problems at the population level (alcohol-related accidents, injuries, suicide, violence, etc)… The goals of therapy are the reduction of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality, and the reduction of other social and

Summary and recommendations

From a public health perspective, harm reduction approaches to alcohol problems are based on the goal of reducing the harm to society arising from the production, marketing, and consumption of alcohol. Harm reduction offers a pragmatic and compassionate approach to the prevention and treatment of problem drinking that shifts the focus away from alcohol use itself to the consequences of harmful drinking behavior. Many individuals experiencing problems related to their drinking (e.g., college

References (108)

  • M.B. Sobell et al.

    Problem drinkers' perceptions of whether treatment goals should be self-selected or therapist selected

    Behavior Therapy

    (1992)
  • H. Alho et al.

    Naltrexone for alcohol dependence: double-blind placebo-controlled Finnish trial

    Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

    (1999)
  • Prevention and treatment of alcohol use disorders

    (1999)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • J.S. Baer

    Etiology and secondary prevention of alcohol problems with young adults

  • J.S. Baer et al.

    Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2001)
  • J.S. Baer et al.

    A comparison of three methods of secondary prevention of alcohol abuse with college students: preliminary results

  • J.S. Baer et al.

    High-risk drinking across the transition from high school to college

    Alcoholism

    (1995)
  • J.S. Baer et al.

    Linking etiology, prevention, and treatment for adolescent alcohol use: towards a better match

  • J.S. Baer et al.

    An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1992)
  • J. Balldin et al.

    A randomized 6 month double-blind placebo-controlled study of naltrexone and coping skills education programme

    Alcohol and Alcoholism

    (1997)
  • A. Bandura

    The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory

    Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

    (1986)
  • G.J. Botvin

    The Life Skills Training program as a health promotion strategy: theoretical issues and empirical findings

    Special Services in the Schools

    (1985)
  • G.J. Botvin et al.

    Preventing adolescent cigarette smoking: resistance skills training and development of life skills

    Special Services in the Schools

    (1990)
  • D.A. Cadogan

    Drug use harm

    American Psychologist

    (1999)
  • P.C. Campanelli et al.

    Pretest and treatment effects in an elementary school-based alcohol misuse prevention program

    Health Education Quarterly

    (1989)
  • J.R. Cornelius et al.

    Preliminary report: double blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics

    Psychopharmacological Bulletin

    (1995)
  • D. Davies

    Normal drinking in recovered addicts

    Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1962)
  • W.A.J.M. de Wildt et al.

    Does psychosocial treatment enhance the efficacy of acamprosate in patients with alcohol problems?

    Alcohol and Alcoholism

    (2002)
  • C.C. DiClemente

    Prevention and harm reduction for chemical dependency: a process perspective

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1999)
  • T. Dielman et al.

    Prevention of adolescent alcohol misuse: an elementary school program

    Journal of Pediatric Psychology

    (1986)
  • Report of the dietary guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans

    (2000)
  • L.A. Dimeff et al.

    Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): a harm reduction approach

    (1999)
  • R.L. DuPont

    Harm reduction and decriminalization in the United States: a personal perspective

    Substance Use and Misuse

    (1996)
  • P.G. Erickson

    Harm reduction: what it is and is not

    Drug and Alcohol Review

    (1995)
  • E.H. Erikson

    Reflections on the dissent of contemporary youth

    Daedalus

    (1970)
  • M.F. Fleming et al.

    Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers: a randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices

    JAMA

    (1997)
  • M.F. Fleming et al.

    Benefit–cost analysis of brief physician advice with problem drinkers in primary care settings

    Medical Care

    (2000)
  • D.W. Foy et al.

    Broad-spectrum behavioral treatment for chronic alcoholics: effects of training controlled drinking skills

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1984)
  • B.F. Grant et al.

    Prevalence of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1992

    Alcohol Health and Research World

    (1994)
  • S.F. Greenfield et al.

    The relationship of self-efficacy expectancies to relapse among alcohol dependent men and women: a prospective study

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (2000)
  • T. Greenfield et al.

    Who drinks most of the alcohol in the US? The policy implications

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (1999)
  • K.B. Harris et al.

    Behavioral self-control training for problem drinkers: components of efficacy

    Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

    (1990)
  • N. Heather et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of moderation-oriented cue exposure

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol

    (2000)
  • R.K. Hester et al.

    Behavioral Self-Control Program for Windows: results of a controlled clinical trial

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1997)
  • R.K. Hester et al.

    Self-control training

  • N.S. Jacobson et al.

    Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1991)
  • E.M. Jellinek

    The disease concept of alcoholism

    (1960)
  • K. Kishline

    Moderate drinking: the moderation management guide for people who want to reduce their drinking

    (1994)
  • D.R. Kivlahan et al.

    Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1990)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text