Viewpoint
Cytokine/chemokine cascades in immunity to tuberculosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01438-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The relationship between acquired specific resistance and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) in immunity to tuberculosis has long been a topic of debate. Here, Ian Orme and Andrea Cooper propose that the events are separate mechanisms; protection is cytokine driven and initially controls the infection, whereas DTH is primarily chemokine driven and functions to wall off the infection and prevent further dissemination.

Section snippets

The basis of immunity to tuberculosis

Since the observations by North that mice lacking T cells were highly susceptible to tuberculosis infection2, 3, and that of Lefford that T cells could transfer immunity4, 5, 6, the field has gradually (but slowly) advanced in terms of identifying the role of various T-cell subsets.

CD4+ T cells capable of transferring immunity appear rapidly after infection of mice7, and these cells secrete interferon γ (IFN-γ) after in vitro restimulation with filtrate antigens of Mycoplasma tuberculosis8, 9,

Early events in the lungs: a putative model

The hypothesis proposed is that infection is established in the lungs by the erosion of a bacterium into the interstitium, causing subsequent inflammation. The resultant immunity is triggered either by bacilli passing into the adjacent capillary, and hence into the vascular circulation, or via carriage by macrophages into the bronchial-associated lymphatic tissue (BALT) from the bronchial surface (the mouse alveolar region has little or no lymphatic drainage).

The model in Fig. 1 shows how an

Cytokine-driven protection and chemokine-driven DTH

In the mouse model, the protective response (IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ) precedes the emergence of the lung chemokine response47. So how are these mechanisms inter-related?

We would like to propose that protection and DTH are not only two separate mechanisms, but that they can be further distinguished by their preferential use of cytokines or chemokines as mediator molecules (Fig. 3). Protective immunity, as we view it, is an attempt by the host to prevent further spread of the infection by identifying

Conclusions

We have proposed as a working hypothesis, and of course as a stimulus for debate, the concept that ‘protective immunity’ and ‘DTH’ are two separate components of cell-mediated immunity to intracellular bacterial pathogens. If correct, the model has multiple implications for better vaccine strategies, which should target the cytokine-driven protective response (and subsequent memory T-cell generation), and improvements in skin test diagnostic reagents, in which the DTH response may not be

Acknowledgements

We thank our MRL colleagues E. Rhoades, B. Saunders, C. D'Souza and A. Frank for their contributions to the hypotheses stated above. This work was supported by NIH programs AI-40488, AI-41922 and AG-06946.

References (57)

  • R.J. North

    Cell. Immunol.

    (1973)
  • S.H.E. Kaufmann

    Immunol. Today

    (1988)
  • W.K. Born et al.

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (1991)
  • R. Boismenu et al.

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (1997)
  • A. Bendelac

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (1995)
  • S.A. Porcelli et al.

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (1996)
  • D.G. Russell

    Curr. Opin. Immunol.

    (1995)
  • E.R. Rhoades et al.

    Tuber. Lung. Dis.

    (1997)
  • G. Kaplan et al.

    Res. Immunol.

    (1996)
  • V. Kindler et al.

    Cell

    (1989)
  • J.L. Flynn et al.

    Immunity

    (1995)
  • S.H.E. Kaufmann et al.

    Res. Immunol.

    (1996)
  • I.M. Orme et al.

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (1993)
  • R.J. North

    Infect. Immun.

    (1974)
  • M.J. Lefford et al.

    Immunology

    (1973)
  • M.J. Lefford

    Infect. Immun.

    (1975)
  • M.J. Lefford

    Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.

    (1975)
  • I.M. Orme

    J. Immunol.

    (1987)
  • I.M. Orme et al.

    J. Immunol.

    (1992)
  • I.M. Orme et al.

    J. Immunol.

    (1993)
  • P. Andersen

    Scand. J. Immunol.

    (1997)
  • J.P. Griffin et al.

    Infect. Immun.

    (1994)
  • I.M. Orme

    J. Immunol.

    (1988)
  • P. Andersen et al.

    J. Immunol.

    (1995)
  • J.L. Flynn et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1992)
  • D.M. Lewinsohn et al.

    J. Immunol.

    (1998)
  • P. Laochumroonvorapong et al.

    Infect. Immun.

    (1997)
  • A.M. Cooper et al.

    Infect. Immun.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (209)

    • Pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes in Mycobacterium bovis challenged bovine macrophages

      2018, Microbial Pathogenesis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chemokine signalling pathway these genes shows up regulation and are the key genes CXCR4, CCR5, CCR3 and MAPT (p38 MAPK). The staffing of leukocytes to the place of inflammation upon foreign particle occurrence for needs of inflammatory immune response chemokines are small chemo attractant peptides that afford turning signals for the cell transferring and thus are vital for shielding host response [35]. The main function of the chemokines cells to lead cellular activation, differentiation and survival, expression of genes associated with the metabolism of cholesterol and lipids identified as a new pathway in the early pathogenesis of the subspecies of M. avium in bovine parasite tuberculosis [36,37].

    • Evolving immunological frontiers in tuberculosis

      2015, Indian Journal of Tuberculosis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text