Research report
Sertraline versus imipramine to prevent relapse in chronic depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00272-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Background: Chronic depressions are common, disabling and under-treated, and long-term treatment is little studied. We report the continuation phase results from a long-term treatment study. Methods: After 12 weeks of acute phase treatment in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multi-center trial of sertraline or imipramine, patients with chronic depression (≥2 years in major depression, or major depression superimposed on dysthymia) continued study drug for 16 weeks. Initially, 635 patients were randomized to sertraline or imipramine in a 2:1 ratio. Nonresponders after 12 weeks entered a 12-week double-blind crossover trial of the alternate medication. Entry into continuation treatment required at least a satisfactory response (partial remission) to initial or crossover treatment. Results: Of 239 acute or crossover responders to sertraline, 60% entered continuation in full remission and 40% with a partial remission. These proportions were identical for imipramine patients (n=147). For both drug groups, over two-thirds of those entering in full remission retained it. For those entering in partial remission, over 40% achieved full remission. Patients requiring crossover treatment were less likely to maintain or improve their response during continuation treatment. The two drugs did not differ significantly in response distribution, drop out rates or discontinuation due to side effects during continuation treatment. Limitations: The absence of a placebo group constrains interpretation of our results, but chronic depressions have low placebo response rates. Conclusions: Most chronic depression patients who remit with 12 weeks of sertraline or imipramine treatment maintain remission during 16 weeks of continuation treatment. Most patients with a satisfactory therapeutic response (partial remission) after 12 weeks of treatment maintain it or further improve. Patients treated with imipramine experienced more side effects, but both drugs were well tolerated.

Introduction

Chronic depressions, defined as dysthymia, major depression lasting ≥2 years, or concurrent dysthymia and major depression concurrently (double depression), are common (Mueller et al., 1996, Weissman et al., 1988), disabling (Hays et al., 1995) and under-treated (Hirschfeld et al., 1997, Shelton et al., 1997). Although chronic depressions respond to short-term pharmacotherapy with tricyclic antidepressants (Bakish et al., 1993, Thase et al., 1996), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (Thase et al., 1996), serotonin type-2 receptor antagonists (Bakish et al., 1993), and a reversible MAO inhibitor (Versianai, 1994), little is known about longer term treatment.

Kocsis et al. (1996) reported that 86% of chronically depressed patients who achieved full remission during a 10-week trial of desipramine maintained this status during 16 weeks of continued treatment. During continuation treatment, 30% of patients entering with a partial remission achieved full remission. In an open-label study with a mean follow-up of 5 years, Haykal and Akiskal (1999) found promising results from long-term SSRI treatment of dysthymia.

We report the double-blind evaluation of continuation phase treatment of chronic major or double depression with sertraline or imipramine. This report addresses the following questions.

  • 1.

    Are sertraline and imipramine equally safe and effective in preventing relapse?

  • 2.

    Do patients who have improved without remitting after 12 weeks of treatment improve further?

  • 3.

    Do patients having either a satisfactory therapeutic response or remission after 12 weeks of treatment relapse despite continued treatment?

  • 4.

    Do patients requiring a crossover trial (12 weeks of the alternate medication) before responding have a worse outcome during continuation treatment?

Section snippets

Methods

The study’s rationale and methods (Rush et al., 1998) are briefly summarized here.

Patient characteristics

We enrolled 635 patients in the acute phase, 426 randomized to sertraline and 209 to imipramine. Of these, 509 completed the acute phase, and 307 enrolled directly in the continuation phase (Keller et al., 1998). An additional 168 patients entered the double-blind crossover phase, of whom 79 subsequently entered continuation phase, bringing the total number of continuation phase patients to 386. Six eligible patients chose not to enrol. Of the patients enrolled in the acute phase, 59% were

Discussion

Despite having been chronically depressed, about two-thirds of patients who achieved full remission after 12 weeks of treatment with sertraline or imipramine maintained this status during 4 months of continued treatment. No significant difference was apparent between the two drugs in continued efficacy or in total discontinuation rates or discontinuation for side effects. Of the 151 patients who entered continuation treatment with a satisfactory response, slightly more than 40% treated with

Conclusions

The four questions posed earlier can now be answered. Firstly, sertraline and imipramine exhibited equal efficacy in preventing relapse of chronic depression during continuation phase treatment. Sertraline was associated with fewer treatment-related emergent adverse events than imipramine. Secondly, most chronically depressed patients who experience a partial remission after 3 months of treatment with sertraline or imipramine maintained or improved this status during 4 months of continued

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by contracts between Pfizer, Inc. and the authors’ institutions. The authors are members of Pfizer’s speakers bureau. Portions of these data were presented at the 37th Annual NCDEU Meeting, Boca Raton, FL, June, 1997.

References (31)

  • H. Nagayama et al.

    Prediction of efficacy of antidepressant by 1-week test therapy in depression

    J. Affect. Disord.

    (1991)
  • E.D. Peselow et al.

    The prophylactic efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants — a five-year follow-up

    Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • D. Bakish et al.

    Ritanserin, imipramine and placebo in the treatment of dysthymic disorder

    J. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1993)
  • A. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • D.P. Doogan et al.

    Sertraline in the prevention of depression

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • J. Endicott et al.

    Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure

    Psychopharmacol. Bull.

    (1993)
  • E. Frank et al.

    Three-year outcomes for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • M. Hamilton

    A rating scale for depression

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1960)
  • R.D. Hays et al.

    Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illness

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • R.F. Haykal et al.

    The long-term outcome of dysthymia in private practice: clinical features, temperament, and the art of management

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • R.M.A. Hirschfeld et al.

    The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (1997)
  • M.M. Katz et al.

    The timing, specificity and clinical prediction of tricyclic drug effects in depression

    Psychol. Med.

    (1987)
  • M.B. Keller et al.

    A double-blind, randomized trial of sertraline or imipramine in chronic depression

    J. Clin. Psychiatry

    (1998)
  • M.B. Keller et al.

    The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation: a comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text