Early ReportRandomised study of endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis versus duct clearance for bileduct stones in high-risk patients
Introduction
Between 10% and 15% of patients with gallbladder stones will have associated common bileduct (CBD) stones1, and the likelihood of CBD stones increases with age; in one operative series2 the prevalence was 6% in patients under 60 years but 33% in those over 80 years. About one-third of patients with CBD stones get recurrent cholangitis or pancreatitis,4 and these complications carry a substantial morbidity and mortality in the elderly or infirm. Prompt intervention is required, to clear the duct of stones or to establish an uninterrupted flow of bile.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction is widely accepted as the initial treatment of choice for a patient of any age with choledocholithiasis; the bileduct can be cleared of stones in 90% of cases.5 This treatment is especially favoured in elderly patients, for whom surgical bileduct exploration carries a high morbidity and mortality.6 In the under-60 age group the mortality rate for common bileduct exploration is only 2% or less, but after 60 years of age it increases sharply, particularly when infectious complications such as suppurative cholangitis are present or when emergency procedures are required.4, 7
In unselected series, endoscopic sphincterotomy has had a 6-10% major complication rate and a 0-4-1-2% mortality rate.8 However, in high-risk elderly patients the major complication rate has been as high as 19% and the mortality rate 7-9%.4 Might the results be improved by use of a biliary endoprosthesis? Good results have been reported in small uncontrolled series with varying follow-up periods; and the postulated mechanism is that, by preventing stone impaction, the prosthesis lessens the risk of biliary obstruction and consequent cholangitis or pancreatitis. We report here a controlled study of endoprosthesis insertion versus standard duct clearance techniques for management of choledocholithiasis in elderly or debilitated patients.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
The patients, drawn from three centres in the United Kingdom, were either ⩾70 years of age or younger with a serious debilitating disease as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiology;9 for inclusion they had to have a single common bileduct stone >10 mm in diameter or two or more stones of any size.
All patients had an ultrasonographic evaluation of the pancreato-biliary system before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which was done under antibiotic cover
Results
43 patients were randomised to BE and 43 to DC. The two groups were well matched for demographic and presenting clinical features (table 1). Table 2 lists the associated medical conditions. The preliminary endoscopy revealed a duodenal diverticulum in nine patients (BE five, DC four). The median number of stones in the bileduct was 1 in the BE group (range 1–5) and 2 in the DC group (1–20); and the median size of stones was 15 mm (range 10–25 mm) in both groups. A common bileduct stricture was
Discussion
In the present study an endoprosthesis proved highly successful for establishing biliary drainage in patients with bileduct stones. Drainage was achieved more quickly than with the duct clearance procedure and the early complication rate was lower, though not significantly so. In previous series both the double-pigtail 7F and straight stents have been reported effective in achieving biliary drainage.10, 11, 12, 13, 14 It was our own experience that prompted use of the 7F pigtail endoprosthesis
References (15)
- et al.
Calculous biliary disease
- et al.
Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 patients
Lancet
(1989) - et al.
Biliary tract surgery in the elderly
Am J Surg
(1982) - et al.
Endoscopic stenting for long-term treatment of large bile duct stones: 2 to 5-year follow-up
Gastrointest Endosc
(1987) - et al.
Study of common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in a consecutive series of 438 patients
Br J Surg
(1987) - et al.
Exploration of the common bile duct: a comparative study
Br J Surg
(1979)
Cited by (107)
Risk factors of recurrent choledocholithiasis following therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
2023, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases InternationalEndoscopic Management of Complex Biliary Stones
2022, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :The effect of long-term biliary stenting in such patients has been investigated. Two studies from the 1990s compared the outcomes for patients undergoing plastic biliary stenting as a definitive treatment compared with either temporary stenting23 or bile duct clearance24 in elderly and high-risk patients. Both studies showed a less favorable outcome in patients who had stents placed as a long-term treatment.
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis
2019, Gastrointestinal EndoscopyACR Appropriateness Criteria <sup>®</sup> Radiologic Management of Biliary Obstruction
2019, Journal of the American College of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Studies evaluating these three methods have failed to demonstrate any significant difference in the results of the 3 techniques [20,21]. Endoscopic CBD stone removal fails in approximately 5% to 10% of cases [10], necessitating a percutaneous approach. Additionally, a subset of patients exists that may benefit from a primary percutaneous approach.
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021
2023, Journal of GastroenterologyERCP for bile duct stones across a national service, demonstrating a high requirement for repeat procedures
2023, Endoscopy International Open