Self-management teaching programs and morbidity of pediatric asthma: A meta-analysis,☆☆,

Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Ambulatory Pediatric Association, Washington, D.C. May 6, 1993.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(95)70150-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Self-management teaching programs are becoming an important asset in the management of pediatric asthma. Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the impact of self-management teaching programs on the morbidity of pediatric asthma. Methods: The meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, published between 1970 and 1991, addressing the outcome of morbidity. Studies were retrieved from searches of MEDLINE, American Journal of Nursing International Index, and Dissertation Abstracts Online Database. The quality of studies was assessed with the scale of Chalmers. The pooled effect size was calculated by the method of Hedges. Results: The literature search retrieved 23 randomized clinical trials, but 12 studies had to be excluded. Global score of quality of studies (Chalmers' scale) was fair, 51.6% ± 9.9%. As indicated by the effect size (ES) of the pooled studies, self-management teaching did not reduce school absenteeism (ES: 0.04 ± 0.08), asthma attacks (ES: 0.09 ± 0.14), hospitalizations (ES: 0.06 ± 0.08), hospital days (ES: -0.11 ± 0.08), or emergency visits (0.14 ± 0.09). Conclusion: Self-management teaching programs do not seem to reduce morbidity, and future programs should focus more on intermediate outcomes such as behavior. (J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL 1995;95:34-41.)

Section snippets

Search of studies

A literature search of all studies, in either English or French, published between 1970 and 1991, was performed with the key words asthma, education, and self-management programs. Studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Index Medicus, American Journal of Nursing International Index, Dissertation Abstracts Online Database, and the bibliography of retrieved studies. Authors of preliminary or pilot studies were contacted in an attempt to obtain further definitive results.

Inclusion criteria

Only

RESULTS

An initial literature search retrieved 106 references in which 23 studies were identified as clinical trials. A more extensive review excluded 12 studies for the following reasons. Three studies were not randomized,20, 21, 22 three studies evaluated a noninteractive teaching intervention consisting of a self-teaching booklet23, 24 or an audiovisual teaching aid,25 and six studies addressed outcomes not related to morbidity such as compliance,26 knowledge,27 attitudes,28, 29 or a combination of

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis shows that self-management teaching programs have surprisingly little influence on morbidity outcomes. In the case of each morbidity variable, pooled effect size remained below 0.2, which we have already described as a small effect size.

We must emphasize that the number of clinical trials included in the meta-analysis was limited to 11 studies and that not all of the 11 studies addressed the five morbidity outcomes selected for the overview. Consequently, pooling of the

References (43)

  • MG Fowler et al.

    School functioning of US children with asthma

    Pediatrics

    (1992)
  • PJ Gergen et al.

    Changing patterns of asthma hospitalization among children: 1979 to 1987

    JAMA

    (1990)
  • K Wilkins et al.

    Trends in rates of admission to hospital and death from asthma among children and young adults in Canada during the 1980s

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1993)
  • SR Wilson-Pessano et al.

    Workshop on asthma self-management: summary of workshop discussion

    J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL

    (1987)
  • EL Klingelhofer et al.

    Asthma self-management programs: premises, not promises

    J Asthma

    (1988)
  • JK Wigal et al.

    A critique of 19 self-management programs for childhood asthma. Part I. Development and evaluation of the programs

    Ped Asthma Allerg Immunol

    (1990)
  • TL Creer et al.

    A critique of 19 self-management programs for childhood asthma. Part II. Comments regarding the scientific merit of the programs

    Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol

    (1990)
  • TD Spector et al.

    The potential and limitations of meta-analysis

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1991)
  • R Peto

    Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials?

    Stat Med

    (1987)
  • A Oxman et al.

    Meta-analysis in primary care. Theory and practice

  • LV Hedges et al.

    Parametric estimation of effect size from a series of experiments

  • Cited by (185)

    • Psychosocial Factors in Severe Pediatric Asthma

      2016, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reviews of the efficacy of educational programs for pediatric patients with asthma have found that they improved knowledge and confidence,61,62 reduced subsequent emergency department visits or hospital admissions,61,63 improved adherence,64,65 and resulted in significant gains in lung function, fewer school days missed, and less activity restriction.63 Additionally, a meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of family psychoeducational programs found that they improved asthma symptoms.66 Further, a randomized controlled trial indicated that small interactive group education was effective in reducing emergency room visits and courses of oral corticosteroids and improving quality of life.67

    • Methods and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial treating early childhood obesity: The Positive Lifestyles for Active Youngsters (Team PLAY) trial

      2012, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Family-based interventions for childhood obesity make intuitive sense, particularly for young children who spend significant time with their parents. Family-based interventions have been effective in the treatment of other childhood illnesses such as asthma [8]. Increasingly common, family-based interventions including children and their parent(s) have shown significant improvement in weight-related measures when compared to controls [9].

    • Public health interventions for asthma: An umbrella review, 1990-2010

      2012, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of these, five focused specifically on SME, with three of the five focusing on interventions for children with asthma. The first found no benefit14; a later Cochrane review reported benefits regarding lung function, symptoms, school absences, and emergency room visits15; the third and most recent did not look at proximal outcomes but found improvements in hospitalizations and emergency room visits.16 A Cochrane review of SME with regular practitioner review among adult asthma patients found improvements in symptoms; productivity (fewer missed work days); emergency room visits; and hospitalizations.17

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    From athe Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal; bthe Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal; and cHôpital Sainte-Justine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Montreal.

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: Anne-Claude Bernard-Bonnin, MD, FRCP(c), Département de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, 3175 Côte Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1C5.

    0091-6749/95 $3.00 + 0 1/1/58677

    View full text