Elsevier

Journal of Human Evolution

Volume 11, Issue 8, December 1982, Pages 697-701
Journal of Human Evolution

On the significance of stature in human society

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(82)80058-4Get rights and content

An analysis was performed on assortment mechanisms and their involvement in the emergence of social differences in stature. This was done by comparing within a number of professional groups the stature of people holding higher posts with the stature of their colleagues in lower positions. It was shown that as a rule people in higher positions were taller than those on lower posts, even after eliminating the influence of social background and formal education. Furthermore, the results of multiple regression analyses demonstrated that when the factors social origin and education were controlled, the variable “professional status” was by far the largest element in explaining the variance in stature.

Finally, indications as to possible causal factors on social assortment of stature were provided by the results of an investigation into the stereotypes of tall people and successful people whose polarity profiles revealed a high degree of congruency.

The results of these studies are interpreted as an indication that there is a mechanism in our society which permits tall people to rise into higher positions more frequently than smaller people. The theory is put forward that this assortment mechanism is directly connected to stature and is the result of an attributional phenomenon by which tall people are attributed qualities also expected of successful people with a frequency quite out of proportion to probability.

References (1)

  • SchumacherA.

    Zur Bedeutung der Korperhöhe in der menschlichen Gesellschaft

    Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie

    (1981)
    SchumacherA.

    Zur Bedeutung der Korperhöhe in der menschlichen Gesellschaft

    Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie

    (1981)

Cited by (29)

  • The evolved psychology of voice: Evaluating interrelationships in listeners' assessments of the size, masculinity, and attractiveness of unseen speakers

    2012, Evolution and Human Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is not clear which of the dimensions might anchor these perceptual associations and thus whether the ordering of the associations here should be reversed (e.g., “what sounds masculine is also assumed to be large”). However, it has been hypothesized that discriminations of size might have priority generally because size is a salient dimension of discrimination not just in mate choice (Lindenfors, Gittleman, & Jones, 2007; Mueller & Mazur, 2001; Nettle, 2002a, 2002b; Pawlowski, Dunbar, & Lipowicz, 2000) but in other social contexts (Ohala, 1983; Schumacher, 1982), and it is relevant much more broadly in the perception and interpretation of many other phenomena in our natural environments (discussed in Rendall et al., 2007). Ultimately, conceptually linking voice-based assessments of masculinity or femininity and attractiveness to basic auditory perceptions of size could be highly functional—an effective cognitive heuristic—if it accurately captures the real-world associations between size and these other dimensions.

  • Too tall?

    1992, The Lancet
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text