Elsevier

European Journal of Radiology

Volume 11, Issue 2, September–October 1990, Pages 131-137
European Journal of Radiology

Original article
Contrast venography: from gold standard to ‘golden backup’ in clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0720-048X(90)90162-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In a series of 180 patients, clinically suspected of having deep venous thrombosis (DVT), contrast venography was compared with radionuclide phlebography, duplex ultrasonography and strain gauge plethysmography. In most patients lung scintigraphy was also performed to detect pulmonary embolism (PE). Venography was performed on a routine basis. All venograms were read by at least two observers (radiologists or radiologist/resident) and an inter-observer agreement was reached of 96% with a kappa value of 0.935. In six patients venography was technically impossible or inadequate. 58% of the patients actually had DVT and 26% developed pulmonary embolism (PE). Of the patients with proven DVT, 43% developed PE. Of the three other methods duplex scanning scored the best for the detection of proximal thrombosis, with 92%, 90% and 9.2, and strain gauge plethysmography the worst, with values of 72%, 78% and 3.2 for, respectively, sensitivity, specificity and positive likelihood ratio's. On the basis of the presented material and the current literature it is concluded that the choice for a screening test for proximal thrombosis could best be made on the basis of (local) availability, cost-effectiveness and patient comfort. Duplex ultrasonography is tipped as the most promising method, accepting that distal thrombosis (calf veins) does not play an important role in PE. Contrast venography should be used as a ‘golden backup’ in any case of doubt.

References (20)

  • VV Kakkar et al.

    Preventive and therapeutic approach to venous thromboembolic disease and pulmonary embolism: can death from pulmonary embolism be prevented?

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1986)
  • J Hirsch et al.

    Clinical features and diagnosis of venous thrombosis

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1986)
  • K Haeger

    Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis, the interpretation of signs and symptoms

    Angiology

    (1969)
  • A Nicolaides et al.

    The origin of deep vein thrombosis: a venographic study

    Br J Radiol

    (1971)
  • RD Hull et al.

    Combined use of leg scanning and impedance plethysmography in suspected thrombosis: an alternative to venography

    N Eng J Med

    (1977)
  • TF O'Donnell et al.

    Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in the outpatient by venography

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1980)
  • SHA Peters et al.

    Home diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis with impedance plethysmography

    Thromb Haemost

    (1982)
  • HC Redman

    Deep venous thrombosis: is contrast venography still the diagnostic ‘gold standard’

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • JB Naidich et al.

    Contrast venography: reassessment of its role

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • MSF McLachlan et al.

    Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venograms

    AJR

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (85)

  • Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy

    2020, Blood Advances
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of the included studies, 41 reported on any suspected lower extremity DVT14-55 and 2 studies reported specifically on patients with recurrent DVT.56,57 Any suspected DVT studies reported the test accuracy of the following index tests: 13 studies on proximal compression US14-26 in comparison with a reference standard, 10 reported on whole-leg US,27-33,51-53 6 reported on serial US,14,18,34-37 and 16 reported on D-dimer for the diagnosis of DVT of the lower extremities.36,38-50,54,55 Studies assessing the accuracy of US used venography as a reference standard with some including clinical follow-up, whereas reference standards for D-dimer tests were mainly proximal compression or whole-leg US.

  • American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism

    2018, Blood Advances
    Citation Excerpt :

    Additionally, we included 9 studies and 5126 patients to inform the effect of performing a test on patient important outcomes for patients suspected of having DVT. The references for the included studies are as follows: proximal compression ultrasound84-96; whole-leg ultrasound97-103; serial ultrasound84,88,104-107; D-dimer.106-119 Question: In a patient population with a low clinical probability of lower extremity DVT, what is the optimal diagnostic strategy to evaluate for suspected first episode DVT?

  • Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: New Imaging Tools and Modalities

    2018, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Contrast venography is an invasive procedure in which venous opacification is evaluated in real time. Although the gold standard for the detection of DVT, this method is rarely practiced outside of expert centers, where it is often used in the context of intervention.1,2 This is in large part due to the myriad of noninvasive imaging techniques that are now widely available, and in particular, the use of ultrasound examination in the diagnosis of DVT.

  • Long-term adverse effects associated with isolated below-knee deep-vein thrombosis: a 10-year follow-up study

    2016, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the diagnosis of DVT, the use of contrast venography (CV) has been superseded by Doppler ultrasound, due to the combination of ease of access, non-invasive nature, and lack of requirement for ionising radiation.2,3 Although CV enjoyed “reference standard” status in detection of both proximal and distal DVT,4,5 ultrasound offers sufficiently high sensitivity of around 97% for diagnosis of proximal-vein DVT6,7; however, for detection of isolated distal-vein DVT, ultrasound has a poorer sensitivity of only around 73%,6 resulting in some cases of isolated below-knee DVT going undiagnosed. Because of the reduced sensitivity of ultrasound compared with CV at detecting below-knee DVT, it is less reliable for assessment of the long-term outcome with regards to recurrent VTE and PTS in this patient population.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text