Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rates and Predictors of Plans for Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in Hospitalized Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters has been increasing over time. However, because of the increased risk of deep vein thrombosis with permanent filters, placement of retrievable filters has been recommended. Little is known about the factors associated with planned retrieval of IVC filters.

OBJECTIVE

To describe rates and predictors of plans to retrieve IVC filters in hospitalized patients.

DESIGN

We identified all IVC filter placements from 2001–2006 at an academic medical center and reviewed medical charts to obtain data about patient characteristics, filter retrieval plans, and retrieval success rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of planned filter retrieval in patients with retrievable filters.

RESULTS

Out of 240 patients who underwent placement of retrievable IVC filters, only 73 (30.4%) had documented plans for filter retrieval. Factors associated with lower rates of planned filter retrieval included a history of cancer [adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval 0.2 (0.1–0.5)] and not being discharged on anticoagulants [OR 0.1 (0.1–0.3)]. In addition, 36 (21.6%) of patients without retrieval plans had no contraindications to retrieval. Of the 62 patients who underwent attempted filter retrieval, 25.8% of filters could not be successfully removed.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 30.4% of patients who underwent placement of a retrievable IVC filter had documented plans for filter removal. Although most patients had justifiable reasons for filter retention, 21.6% of patients had no clear contraindications to filter removal. Efforts to improve rates of filter retrieval in appropriate patients may help reduce the long-term complications of IVC filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IVC:

inferior vena cava

SD:

standard deviation

VTE:

venous thromboembolism

References

  1. Anderson RC, Bussey HI. Retrievable and permanent inferior vena cava filters: selected considerations. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:1595–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crowther MA. Inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous thromboembolism. Am J Med. 2007;120:S13–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Imberti D, Ageno W, Carpenedo M. Retrievable vena cava filters: a review. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baglin TP, Brush J, Streiff M. Guidelines on use of vena cava filters. Br J Haematol. 2006;134:590–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par interruption cave study group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:409–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenfield LJ, The PREPIC Study Group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) Randomized Study. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2006;18:187–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1541–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Writing G, Baglin TP, Brush J, et al. Guidelines on use of vena cava filters. Br J Haematol. 2006;134:590–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grande WJ, Trerotola SO, Reilly PM, et al. Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1189–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seshadri T, Tran H, Lau KK, et al. Ins and outs of inferior vena cava filters in patients with venous thromboembolism: the experience at Monash Medical Centre and review of the published reports. Intern Med J. 2008;38:38–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, et al. Gunther tulip inferior vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:442–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, et al. Extended interval for retrieval of Gunther Tulip filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:1257–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bovyn G, Ricco JB, Reynaud P, et al. Long-duration temporary vena cava filter: a prospective 104-case multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:1222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliva VL, Szatmari F, Giroux MF, et al. The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1439–45. quiz 1445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al. Gunther Tulip Retrievable Vena Cava Filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:1053–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asch MR. Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology. 2002;225:835–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A, et al. Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1370–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, et al. Clinical experience with retrievable Gunther Tulip vena cava filters. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:994–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marquess JS, Burke CT, Beecham AH, et al. Factors associated with failed retrieval of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:1321–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hermsen JL, Ibele AR, Faucher LD, et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in high-risk trauma and surgical patients: factors influencing successful removal. World J Surg. 2008;32:1444–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiou AC, Biggs KL, Matsumura JS. Vena cava filters: why, when, what, how? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005;17:329–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood. 2000;95:3669–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ray CE Jr, Kaufman JA. Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21:368–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelbfish GA, Ascer E. Intracardiac and intrapulmonary Greenfield filters: a long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:614–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. James KV, Sobolewski AP, Lohr JM, et al. Tricuspid insufficiency after intracardiac migration of a Greenfield filter: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:494–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC, et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J Trauma. 2007;62:17–24. discussion 24–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. FitzPatrick MK, Reilly P, Stavropoulos SW. The use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in trauma: implications for the trauma team. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13:45–51. quiz 52–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ray CE Jr, Mitchell E, Zipser S, et al. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1595–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kirilcuk NN, Herget EJ, Dicker RA, et al. Are temporary inferior vena cava filters really temporary? Am J Surg. 2005;190:858–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Allen TL, Carter JL, Morris BJ, et al. Retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients for high-risk prophylaxis and prevention of pulmonary embolism. Am J Surg. 2005;189:656–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Institute on Aging Paul B. Beeson Career Development award AG28978 (MF) and a University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Student Summer Research Program grant (JM).

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret C. Fang MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mission, J.F., Kerlan, R.K., Tan, J.H. et al. Rates and Predictors of Plans for Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval in Hospitalized Patients. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 321–325 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1227-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1227-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation