Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Imperative for Research to Promote Health Equity in Indigenous Communities

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health disparities exact a devastating toll upon Indigenous people in the USA. However, there has been scant research investment to develop strategies to address these inequities in Indigenous health. We present a case for increased health promotion, prevention, and treatment research with Indigenous populations, providing context to the recent NIH investment in the Intervention Research to Improve Native American Health (IRINAH) network. We discuss the disproportionate costs and consequences of disparities borne by Indigenous groups, the limited evidence base on effective intervention for this population, how population uniqueness often makes transfer of existing intervention models difficult, and additional challenges in creating interventions for Indigenous settings. Given the history of colonial disruption that has included genocide, forced removal from lands, damaging federal, state and local policies and practices, environmental contamination, and most recently, climate change, we conclude research that moves beyond minor transformations of existing majority population focused interventions, but instead truly respects Indigenous wisdom, knowledge, traditions, and aspirations is needed, and that investment in intervention science to address Indigenous health disparities represent a moral imperative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The focus of this paper is on the Indigenous populations of the United States. The National Instututes of Health (NIH) Intervention Research to Improve Native American Health (IRINAH) program funds projects with American Indian (AI), Alaska Native (AN), and Native Hawaiian (NH) groups. Much of the research on Indigenous people in the U.S. includes data for only AI and AN people, in part, due to delayed recognition of status for NH people. Because of this, where data combines all three populations, we refer to Indigenous peoples. Where data combines AI and AN peoples, we refer to AIAN, and where data is for one group, we refer to that group.

References

Download references

Funding

Preparation of this article was supported by funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA03514), Kathleen Kelly, Linda Stanley, and Randall Swaim, PIs; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES022583), Curtis Noonan, Annie Belcourt, and Tony Ward, PIs; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES022649), Curtis Noonan and Tony Ward, PIs; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL126577), Joseph Keawe‘aimoku Kaholokula, PI; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA023754), Stacy Rasmus and James Allen, PIs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda R. Stanley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants or Animals

No research involving human participants or animals was conducted in the preparation of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanley, L.R., Swaim, R.C., Kaholokula, J.K. et al. The Imperative for Research to Promote Health Equity in Indigenous Communities. Prev Sci 21 (Suppl 1), 13–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0850-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0850-9

Keywords

Navigation