Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does emotional support influence survival? Findings from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 163 patients with advanced cancer at an Australian teaching hospital were interviewed to investigate whether emotional support was predictive of survival duration. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimate, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, from entry to the study in 1996 to date of death, or 31 March 2003, whichever came first. The number of confidants with whom feelings were being shared at the time of study entry was predictive of survival duration. The regression analysis indicated that compared with patients reporting two or three confidants, the relative risk of a shorter survival (95% confidence limits) was 0.44 (0.25, 0.79) for those with no or one confidant and 0.60 (0.40, 0.89) for those with four or more confidants. Shorter survivors shared their feelings more with family members than longer survivors. Conversely, longer survivors shared their feelings more with friends than shorter survivors. These relationships did not hold at 12 weeks from study entry. At that time, longer survivors were more likely to be sharing their feelings with a doctor than shorter survivors. The relationship between emotional support and survival duration was not linear and appeared to be more complex than reported previously for people with heart disease and newly diagnosed breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkman LF, Syme SL (1979) Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 109:186–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blazer DG (1982) Social support and mortality in an elderly community population. Am J Epidemiol 115:684–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL (1982) The association of social relationships and activities with mortality: prospective evidence from the Tecumseh Community Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 116:123–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoenbach VJ, Kaplan BH, Fredman L, Kleinbaum DG (1986) Social ties and mortality in Evans County, Georgia. Am J Epidemiol 123:577–591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seeman TE, Kaplan GA, Knudsen L, Cohen R, Guralnik J (1987) Social network ties and mortality among the elderly in the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol 126:714–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Orth-Gomer K, Johnson JV (1987) Social network interaction and mortality. A six year follow-up study of a random sample of the Swedish population. J Chron Dis 40:949–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan GA, Salonen JT, Cohen RD, Brand RJ, Syme SL, Puska P (1988) Social connections and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease: prospective evidence from eastern Finland. Am J Epidemiol 128:370–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson BS, Isacsson SO, Janzon L, Lindell SE (1989) Social network and social support influence mortality in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol 130:100–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds P, Kaplan GA (1990) Social connections and risk for cancer: prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. Behav Med 16:101–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Siegler IC, Clapp-Channing NE, Lytle BL, Bosworth HB, et al (2001) Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med 63:267–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandra V, Szklo M, Goldberg R, Tonascia J (1983) The impact of marital status on survival after an acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 117:320–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruberman W (1992) Psychosocial influences on mortality of patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA 267:559–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hislop TG, Waxler NE, Coldman AJ, Elwood JM, Kan L (1987) The prognostic significance of psychosocial factors in women with breast cancer. J Chron Dis 40:729–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunkel-Schetter C, Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1987) Correlates of social support receipt. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:71–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seeman TE, Berkman LF (1988) Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med 26:737–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Waxler-Morrison N, Hislop TG, Mears B, Kan L (1991) Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study. Soc Sci Med 33:177–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dunkel-Schetter C, Wortman CB (1982) The interpersonal dynamics of cancer: problems in social relationships and their impact on the patient. In: Friedman HS, DiMatteo MR (eds) Interpersonal issues in health care, 1st edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 69–100

  18. Peters-Golden H (1982) Breast cancer: varied perceptions of social support in the illness experience. Soc Sci Med 16:483–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman DR, Ellard JH, Wortman CB (1986) Social support for the bereaved: recipients’ and providers’ perspectives on what is helpful. J Consult Clin Psychol 54:438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coyne JC, Wortman CB, Lehman DR (1988) The other side of support: emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In: Gottlieb BH (ed) Marshaling social support: formats, processes and effects. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 305–330

  21. Williams S, Kent G (1996) Patients’ disclosure of a diagnosis of cancer: issues in obtaining social support. J Cancer Care 5:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berkman LF, Kawachi I (eds) (2000) Social epidemiology, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York

  23. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI (1992) Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 117:1003–1009

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krumholz HM, Butler J, Miller J, Vaccarino V, Williams CS, Mendes de Leon CF, et al (1998) Prognostic importance of emotional support for elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure. Circulation 97:958–964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L (1995) Social support and survival among women with breast cancer. Cancer 76:631–637

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ell K, Nishimoto R, Mediansky L, Mantell J, Hamovitch M (1992) Social relations, social support and survival among patients with cancer. J Psychosom Res 36:531–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware JE (1993) Measuring patients’ views: the optimum outcome measure. BMJ 306:1429–1430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31:247–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32:40–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shadbolt B, Barresi J, Craft P (2002) Self-rated health as a predictor of survival among patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:2514–2519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Orth Gomer K, Unden AL (1987) The measurement of social support in population surveys. Soc Sci Med 24:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Reilly P (1988) Methodological issues in social support and social network research. Soc Sci Med 26:863–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sledge WH, Feinstein AR (1997) A clinimetric approach to the components of the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 278:2043–2048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feinstein AR (1999) Multi-item “instruments” vs Virginia Apgar’s principles of clinimetrics. Arch Intern Med 159:125–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. STATACORP (2003) Stata statistical software. STATA Corporation, College Station, Florida

  36. Armitage P, Berry G (1987) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  37. Bowling A (1998) Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia, pp 1–159

  38. Bowling A (1991) Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales, 1st edn. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia

  39. McDowell I, Newell C (1987) Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  40. McDowell I, Newell C (1998) Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thoits PA (1995) Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? J Health Soc Behav Spec No:53–79

    Google Scholar 

  42. Slevin ML, Nichols SE, Downer SM, Wilson P, Lister TA, Arnott S, et al (1996) Emotional support for cancer patients: what do patients really want? Br J Cancer 74:1275–1279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Neuling SJ, Winefield HR (1988) Social support and recovery after surgery for breast cancer: frequency and correlates of supportive behaviours by family, friends and surgeon. Soc Sci Med 27:385–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rose JH (1990) Social support and cancer: adult patients’ desire for support from family, friends, and health professionals. Am J Community Psychol 18:439–464

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nijboer C, Tempelaar R, Sanderman R, Triemstra M, van den Spruijt RJ, et al (1998) Cancer and caregiving: the impact on the caregiver’s health. Psychooncology 7:3–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Burns CM, Dixon T, Broom D, Smith WT, Craft PS (2003) Family caregiver knowledge of treatment intent in a longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer [see Editorial]. Support Care Cancer 11:629–637; editorial 617–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Young J, De Geest S, Spirig R, Flepp M, Rickenbach M, Furrer H, et al (2004) Stable partnership and progression to AIDS or death in HIV infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: Swiss HIV cohort study. BMJ 328:15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Gaccione P (2002) Specialty of ambulatory care physicians and mortality among elderly patients after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 347:1678–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tierney WM, Weinberger M, Ayanian J, Burnam A, Escarce JJ, Hays RD, et al (2001) Medical care: past, present, and future. Med Care 39:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pappas G, Queen S, Hadden W, Fisher G (1993) The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986 [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1993 Oct 7;329(15):1139] [see comments]. N Engl J Med 329:103–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD, Chaudhary BS (1984) Psychosocial influences on mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 311:552–559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was undertaken as part of the Canberra Quality of Life Project, funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health and Community Services. The Cancer Council South Australia also is acknowledged for providing financial support to the first author. The authors wish to thank patients and their caregivers for participating and medical, nursing and social work colleagues for their support, and A/Professor Amy Abernathy for editorial comment

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine M. Burns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burns, C.M., Craft, P.S. & Roder, D.M. Does emotional support influence survival? Findings from a longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 13, 295–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0722-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0722-2

Keywords

Navigation