Skip to main content
Log in

Ki-67 is a reliable pathological grading marker for neuroendocrine tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), proliferation markers, especially Ki-67, have become increasingly important. This study was designed to examine the reproducibility of Ki-67 for use in the current classification of NETs. A retrospectively assembled integrated database with prospectively collected data of patients undergoing multidisciplinary management for NETs from 2000 to 2009 was analyzed. Original pathology was reviewed to reassess Ki-67 values. Ki-67 was then categorized to grades G1 (≤2 %), G2 (3–20 %), or G3 (>20 %) according to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) guidelines and the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Original Ki-67 values were compared to reviewed values. All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 9.1.3. A total of 184 patients were included of which 48 % were male. The most common primary NET site was the small bowel, in 27 %. On pathology review, there was 94 % agreement for G1, with 4 % of cases upgraded at review to G2 and 2 % of cases upgraded to G3. For G2, there was 94 % agreement, with 6 % of cases downgraded to G1 and 0 % upgraded. For G3, there was 90 % agreement, with 10 % of cases downgraded to G2 and none to G1 (kappa = 0.89). Ki-67 is a proliferative marker for NETs that is highly reproducible when used to grade tumors according to ENETS and WHO categories. The high inter-institutional reliability in the determination of tumor grade as assessed by Ki-67 makes it a reliable tool in the assessment of patients with NETs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB (2008) One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 26:3063–3072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauso O, Gustafsson BI, Kidd M, Waldum HL, Drozdov I, Chan AK, Modlin IM (2008) Neuroendocrine tumor epidemiology: contrasting Norway and North America. Cancer 113:2655–2664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hemminki K, Li X (2001) Incidence trends and risk factors of carcinoid tumors: a nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden. Cancer 92:2204–2210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis L, Shale MJ, Coleman MP (2010) Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: trends in incidence in England since 1971. Am J Gastroenterol 105:2563–2569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Modlin IM, Moss SF, Chung DC, Jensen RT, Snyderwine E (2008) Priorities for improving the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(18):1282–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker H-H, Schwab U, Stein H (1984) Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 133(4):1710–1715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholzen T, Gerdes J (2000) The Ki-67 Protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol 182:311–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamali M, Runjan C (2008) Predicting prognosis in gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an overview and the value of Ki-67 immunostaining. Endocr Pathol 19:282–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vilar E, Salazar R, Pérez-García J, Cortes J, Öberg K, Tabernero J (2007) Chemotherapy and role of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in digestive neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 14:221–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. La Rosa S, Sessa F, Capella C, Riva C, Leone BE, Klersy C, Rindi G, Solcia E (1996) Prognostic criteria in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumours. Virchows Arch 429(6):323–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pape U-F, Berndt U, Müller-Nordhorn J, Böhmig M, Roll S, Koch M, Willich SN, Wiedenmann B (2008) Prognostic factors of long-term outcome in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:1083–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pelosi G, Bresaola E, Bogina G, Pasini F, Rodella S, Castelli P, Lacono C, Serio G, Zamboni G (1996) Endocrine tumors of the pancreas: Ki-67 immunoreactivity on paraffin sections is an independent predictor for malignancy: a comparative study with proliferating-cell nuclear antigen and progesterone receptor protein immunostaining, mitotic index, and other clinicopathologic variables. Hum Pathol 27(11):1124–1134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold R, Rinke A, Klose K-J, Müller H-H, Wied M, Zamzow K, Schmidt C, Schade-Brittinger C, Barth P, Moll R, Koller M, Unterhalt M, Hiddemann W, Schmidt-Lauber M, Pavel M, Arnold CN (2005) Octreotide versus octreotide plus interferon-alpha in endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: a randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3:761–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Adsay NV, Chetty R, Desphande V, Gönen M, Jensen RT, Kidd M, Kulke MH, Lloyd RV, Moran C, Moss SF, Oberg K, O’Toole D, Rindi G, Robert ME, Suster S, Tang LH, Tzen C-Y, Washington MK, Wiedenmann B, Yao J (2010) Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set. Am J Surg Pathol 34(3):300–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Ahlmann H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol A-M, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec J-Y, Wiedenmann B et al (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol A-M, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoaze J-Y, Wiedenmann B (2007) TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 451:757–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Plöckinger U, Rindi G, Arnold R, Eriksson B, Krenning EP, de Herder WW, Goede A, Caplin M, Öberg K, Reubi JC, Nilsson O, Delle Fave G, Ruszniewski P, Ahlman H, Wiedenmann B (2004) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumour: a consensus statement on behalf of the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS). Neuroendocrinology 80:394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, Woltering EA, Jensen RT, Goldsmith SJ, Nutting C, Bushnell DL, Caplin ME, Yao JC (2010) The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the jejunum, ileum, appendix, and cecum. Pancreas 39(6):753–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence B, Kidd M, Svedja B, Modlin I (2011) A clinical perspective on gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13:101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kocha W, Maroun J, Kennecke H, Law C, Metrako P, Ouellet JF, Reid R, Rowsell C, Shah A, Singh S, Uum SV, Wong R (2010) Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of well-differentiated gastroenterohepatic neuroendocrine tumours: a revised statement from a Canadian National Expert Group. Curr Oncol 17(3):49–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S (2010) The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading and staging systems. Pancreas 39(6):707–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mengel M, von Wasielewski R, Wiese B, Rüdiger T, Müller-Hermelink HK, Kreipe H (2002) Inter-laboratory and inter-observer reproducibility of immunohistochemical assessment of the Ki-67 labelling index in a large multi-centre trial. J Pathol 198:292–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elie N, Plancoulaine B, Signolle J-P, Herlin P (2003) A simple way of quantifying immunostained cell nuclei on the whole histologic section. Cytometry A 56(1):37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lejeune M, Jaén J, Pons L, López C, Salvadó M-T, Bosch R, Garcia M, Escrivà P, Baucells J, Cugat X, Álvaro T (2008) Quantification of diverse subcellular immunohistochemical markers with clinicobiological relevancies: validation of a new computer-assisted image analysis procedure. J Anat 212:868–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhall D, Frishberg DP, Galliano G, Chiles L, Chung F, Ines D, Wang HL (2009) Interobserver variability in assessing Ki-67 proliferative index in gastrointestinal well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms. Mod Pathol 22:116A

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodell PP, Krasinskas AM, Davison JM, Hartman DJ (2012) Comparison of methods for proliferative index analysis for grading pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 137:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lowe K, Khithani A, Liu E, Winston T, Christian D, Saad J, Jeyarajah DR (2012) Ki-67 labeling: a more sensitive indicator of malignant phenotype than mitotic count or tumor size? J Surg Oncol 106(6):724–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, Krenning E, Oberg K, Steinmuller T, Anlauf M, Wiedenmann B, Salazar R et al (2012) ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology 95:157–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin H. L. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadler, A., Cukier, M., Rowsell, C. et al. Ki-67 is a reliable pathological grading marker for neuroendocrine tumors. Virchows Arch 462, 501–505 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1410-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1410-8

Keywords

Navigation