Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of prospective payment and discharge location on the outcome of hip fracture

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To determine the impact of prospective payment by diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on length of stay in the hospital, ambulatory status, and level of post-hospital care needed for patients hospitalized with hip fracture.

Design:Retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of cases before and after the reference date of implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS).

Setting:Academic, tertiary-care hospital.

Patients/participants:181 patients 69 years of age or older admitted with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or DRG codes for hip fracture.

Results:Length of stay was shorter by 1.37 days in the post-PPS era (p=0.05). Poorer discharge ambulation was found in the post-PPS group (p=0.089). At one year, differences in ambulation and nursing home residence were found to be related not to the implementation of PPS, but rather to the nursing home to which the patient was discharged. Patients discharged to a facility with active physical rehabilitation were less likely to remain institutionalized (p=0.0025) than those in “ordinary” nursing homes and ambulated more independently (p=0.05).

Conclusions:The PPS did not have a significant long-term impact on hip fracture outcome. Post-hospital care may be of crucial importance to the future quality of life of hip fracture patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berenson R. Medicare’s prospective payment system and the care of frail elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984;32:843–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jahnigen DW, Hannon C, Laxon L, La Force FM. Iatrogenic diseases of hospitalized elderly veterans. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1982;30:387–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Owen RA, Melton LJ. The national cost of acute care of hip fracture associated with osteoporosis. Clin Orthop. 1980;50:172–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter GM, Ginsburg PB. The Medicare case mix index increase, medical practice changes, aging and DRG creep. Rand/UCLA Center Health Care Finance Policy Research, June 1985; Publication R03292-HCFA.

  5. Horn SD: Measuring severity of illness: comparisons across institutions. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:25–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgerald JF, Fagan LF. Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. JAMA. 1987;258:218–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzgerald JF, Moore PS, Dittus RS. The care of elderly patients with hip fracture: changes since the implementation of the prospective payment system. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1392–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ceder L, Ekelund L. Rehabilitation after hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;60(6 pt 1):681–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller CW. Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;60-A(7):930–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson RK. Fracture of the hip in the elderly: a survey of Kent Medicare patients. J Ky Med Assoc. 1985;21:125–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the National Institute on Aging Clinical Investigator Award No. K08AG00246 (Dr. Winograd) and the Veterans Administration.

The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Veterans Administration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerety, M.B., Soderholm-Difatte, V. & Winograd, C.H. Impact of prospective payment and discharge location on the outcome of hip fracture. J Gen Intern Med 4, 388–391 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599687

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599687

Key words

Navigation