Abstract
Objective:To determine the impact of prospective payment by diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on length of stay in the hospital, ambulatory status, and level of post-hospital care needed for patients hospitalized with hip fracture.
Design:Retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of cases before and after the reference date of implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS).
Setting:Academic, tertiary-care hospital.
Patients/participants:181 patients 69 years of age or older admitted with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or DRG codes for hip fracture.
Results:Length of stay was shorter by 1.37 days in the post-PPS era (p=0.05). Poorer discharge ambulation was found in the post-PPS group (p=0.089). At one year, differences in ambulation and nursing home residence were found to be related not to the implementation of PPS, but rather to the nursing home to which the patient was discharged. Patients discharged to a facility with active physical rehabilitation were less likely to remain institutionalized (p=0.0025) than those in “ordinary” nursing homes and ambulated more independently (p=0.05).
Conclusions:The PPS did not have a significant long-term impact on hip fracture outcome. Post-hospital care may be of crucial importance to the future quality of life of hip fracture patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berenson R. Medicare’s prospective payment system and the care of frail elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984;32:843–8.
Jahnigen DW, Hannon C, Laxon L, La Force FM. Iatrogenic diseases of hospitalized elderly veterans. J Am Geriatric Soc. 1982;30:387–90.
Owen RA, Melton LJ. The national cost of acute care of hip fracture associated with osteoporosis. Clin Orthop. 1980;50:172–6.
Carter GM, Ginsburg PB. The Medicare case mix index increase, medical practice changes, aging and DRG creep. Rand/UCLA Center Health Care Finance Policy Research, June 1985; Publication R03292-HCFA.
Horn SD: Measuring severity of illness: comparisons across institutions. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:25–31.
Fitzgerald JF, Fagan LF. Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system. JAMA. 1987;258:218–21.
Fitzgerald JF, Moore PS, Dittus RS. The care of elderly patients with hip fracture: changes since the implementation of the prospective payment system. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1392–97.
Ceder L, Ekelund L. Rehabilitation after hip fracture in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;60(6 pt 1):681–8.
Miller CW. Survival and ambulation following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;60-A(7):930–3.
Johnson RK. Fracture of the hip in the elderly: a survey of Kent Medicare patients. J Ky Med Assoc. 1985;21:125–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by the National Institute on Aging Clinical Investigator Award No. K08AG00246 (Dr. Winograd) and the Veterans Administration.
The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Veterans Administration.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerety, M.B., Soderholm-Difatte, V. & Winograd, C.H. Impact of prospective payment and discharge location on the outcome of hip fracture. J Gen Intern Med 4, 388–391 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599687
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599687