Skip to main content
Log in

Expert systems and expert behavior

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iliad 4.0 and QMR 2.03 are computer-based diagnostic knowledge bases that can play many roles in decision support and other areas of medical practice, but neither appears ready to assume the role of an expert diagnostic consultant. In contrast to human experts, these programs have problems related to recognition of their own limitations, interpretation of continuous data, recognition of dependent findings, selection of tests, and description of the impact of certain tests. Suggestions to improve these aspects of knowledge bases are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergeron, B., Iliad: A diagnostic consultant and patient simulator.MD Comput. 8(1):46–53, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, R.A., Masarie, F.E., and Myers, J.D., ‘Quick Medical Reference (QMR)’ for diagnostic assistance.MD Comput. 5:34–49, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Szolovtis, P., and Pauker, S.G., Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis. In (W.J. Clancey and E.H. Shortliffe, eds.),Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence—The First Decade. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1984, pp. 210–240. (Originally fromArtificial Intelligence, 11:115–144, 1978.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shortliffe, E.H., Buchanan, B.G., and Feigenbaum, E.A., Knowledge engineering for medical decision making: A review of computer-based clinical decision aids. In (W.J. Clancey and E.H. Shortliffe, eds.),Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence—The First Decade. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1984, pp. 35–71. (Originally from Proceedings of the IEEE, 1979, 67:1207–1224.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, R.A., Pople, H.E., and Myers, J.D., Internist-1, an experimental computer based diagnostic consultant for general internal medicine.N. Engl. J. Med. 307:468–476, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Teach, R.L., and Shortliffe, E.H., An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems.Comput. Biomed. Res. 14:542–558, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, W.G., Chinchilli, V.M., Gruemer, H.D., and Nance, W.E., Sampling from a skewed population distribution as exemplified by estimation of the creatine kinase upper reference limit.Clin. Chem. 30(1):18–23, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gammerman, A., and Thatcher, A.R., Bayesian diagnostic probabilities without assuming independence of symptoms.Methods Inf. Med. 30(1):15–22, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naka, M., Hiramatsu, K., Aizawa, T.,et al. Silent myocardial ischemia in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus as judged by treadmill exercise testing and coronary angiography.Am. Heart J. 123(1):46–53, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weiner, D.A., Ryan, T.J., McCabe, G.H.,et al. Exercise stress testing: Correlations among history of angina, ST-segment response and prevalence of coronary artery disease in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS).N. Engl. J. Med. 301:230–235, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, D., Lincoln, M.J., Haug, P.J., Turner, C.W., and Warner, H.R., Exploring a new best information algorithm for Iliad. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, D.C., pp. 624–628, 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sumner, W., Shultz, E.K. Expert systems and expert behavior. J Med Syst 16, 183–193 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000271

Keywords

Navigation