Abstract
While parents have traditionally provided proxy consent for minors to participate in research, this has proven inadequate for adolescents who are mentally and emotionally capable of making their own decisions. Research has proven that even young children, and certainly most adolescents, are developmentally prepared to make such decisions for themselves. The author challenges the assumption that both consent and assent are static concepts, and proposes that a sliding scale of competence be created to ascertain the adolescent's comprehension of the proposed research by shifting the burden of proof to those who believe a particular adolescent is unable to provide informed consent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levine RJ.Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Urban & Schwartzenberg, 1986: 100–117.
Levine: 99
Melton GB, Koocher GP, Saks MJ, eds.Children's Competence to Consent. New York: Plenum Press, 1983: 182.
The Nuremberg Code, in Chrisoffel T.Health and the Law: A Handbook for Health Professionals. New York: The Free Press, 1982: 290.
211 N.Y. 125, 129, 105 N.E.2d 92, 93 (1914), in Ewald LS, Medical decision making for children: an analysis of competing interests.SLU L J, 1982;25:690.
Ewald: 689; See also. Weithorn LA. Children's capacities to decide about participation in research.IRB: Rev Hum Subj Res 1983;5(March/April):3.
Barber B.Informed Consent in Medial Therapy and Research. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1980: 168.
Dickins MB.Medico-Legal Aspects of Family Law. Toronto: Butterworth's 1979, in Paxman JM, Zuckerman RJ, eds.Laws and Policies affecting Adolescent Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987: 15.
Ewald: 702.
Ewald: 702.
Ewald: 702.
Munson CF. Toward a standard of informed consent by the adolescent in medical treatment decisions.Dickinson L. Rev. 1981;85:436.
Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent, parental permission and assent in pediatric practice.Peds 1995;95:315.
Schoeman F. Children's competence and children's rights.IRB: Rev Human Subj Res 1982;4(June/July):1.
Popcaro ET. Experimentation with children: The “pawns” of medical technology.Medicolegal News 1979;7:7.
But see Woodward WE. Informed consent of volunteers: A direct measurement of comprehension and retention of information.Clin Res 1979;27:248–252.
Meisel A, Roth LH. Informed consent.Ariz L Rev 1983;25:293.
Gray BH.Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation. New York: Wiley, 1975; in Howard JM, DeMets D, eds. BHAT research group.Con Clin Trials 1981;2:300.
Ingelfinger FJ. Informed (but uneducated) consent.N Engl J Med 1972;287:466.
Meisel and Roth: 288.
Levine RJ. Research involving children: An interpretation of the new regulations.IRB: Rev Human Subj Res 1983;5(July/August):1.
Greenwald RA, Ryan MK, Mulvihill JE, eds.Human Subjects Research: A Handbook for Institutional Review Boards. New York: Plenum Press, 1982: 145.
Committee on Bioethics: 315.
Committee on Bioethics: 315.
Levine: 1.
Schoeman: 2.
Weithorn: 3.
Weithorn: 3.
Weithorn: 3.
Keith-Speigel P., Mass T.Consent to Research: Are There Developmental Differences? Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention. Los Angeles, 1981, in Weithorn: 3.
Weithorn: 5.
Barber: 171.
Munson: 440–441.
Gaylin W, Macklin R, eds.Who Speaks for the Child? The Problems of Proxy Consent. New York: Plenum Press, 1982: 292.
Ibid: 292.
Krmer DT.Legal Rights of Children (Vol. 1). 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994: 590–592.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zinner, S.E. The elusive goal of informed consent by adolescents. Theor Med Bioeth 16, 323–331 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995479
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995479