Table 3:

Putatively harmful and protective characteristics of articles focusing on suicide in major Toronto publications (2011–2014) and their association with increases or decreases in suicides after publication

Characteristics of media itemsTotal (%)
n = 6367
No. of articles followed by increased suicides (%)No. of articles followed by no change in suicides (%)No. of articles followed by decreased suicides (%)Harmful effect analysis*Protective effect analysis
Increased v. no change or decreased suicides, OR (95% CI)No change or increased v. decreased suicides, OR (95% CI)
Putatively harmful
Word “suicide” in the headline1736 (27.3)754 (43.4)234 (13.5)748 (43.1)0.98 (0.88–1.10)0.95 (0.85–1.06)
Suicide method (in headline)225 (3.5)115 (51.1)29 (12.9)81 (36)1.36 (1.04–1.77)1.31 (0.99–1.72)
Suicide method (in text)3153 (49.5)1420 (45.0)439 (13.9)1294 (41.0)1.11 (1.00–1.22)1.10 (0.99–1.21)
 Hanging758 (11.9)328 (43.3)130 (17.2)300 (39.6)0.98 (0.84–1.14)1.13 (0.97–1.32)
 Self-poisoning590 (9.3)265 (44.9)74 (12.5)251 (42.5)1.05 (0.89–1.25)0.98 (0.83–1.17)
 Jumping (from building)219 (3.4)123 (56.2)28 (12.8)68 (31.1)1.68 (1.28–2.20)1.64 (1.23–2.20)
 Jumping (from bridge)248 (3.9)110 (44.4)41 (16.5)97 (39.1)1.03 (0.79–1.32)1.14 (0.88–1.48)
 Railway113 (1.8)39 (34.5)15 (13.3)59 (52.2)0.67 (0.46–0.99)0.66 (0.46–0.96)
 Asphyxia by car exhaust30 (0.5)9 (30)9 (30)12 (40)0.55 (0.25–1.20)1.09 (0.53–2.27)
 Asphyxia other than by car exhaust346 (5.4)183 (52.9)58 (16.8)105 (30.3)1.47 (1.19–1.83)1.72 (1.36–2.17)
 Firearm824 (12.9)404 (49.0)99 (12.0)321 (39.0)1.28 (1.10–1.48)1.16 (1.00–1.35)
 Cutting or stabbing201 (3.2)74 (36.8)23 (11.4)104 (51.7)0.74 (0.55–0.99)0.67 (0.51–0.89)
 Drowning78 (1.2)26 (33.3)11 (14.1)41 (52.6)0.64 (0.40–1.03)0.65 (0.42–1.02)
 Burning or electrocution126 (2.0)52 (41.3)23 (18.3)51 (40.5)0.90 (0.63–1.29)1.07 (0.75–1.54)
 “Suicide by cop”27 (0.4)13 (48.1)6 (22.2)8 (29.6)1.19 (0.56–2.54)1.73 (0.76–3.97)
 Assisted death132 (2.1)62 (47.0)10 (7.6)60 (45.5)1.14 (0.81–1.61)0.87 (0.62–1.23)
 Other212 (3.3)100 (47.2)23 (10.8)89 (42.0)1.15 (0.88–1.52)1.01 (0.76–1.33)
Method described in detail812 (12.8)377 (46.4)100 (12.3)335 (41.3)1.13 (0.98–1.31)1.04 (0.90–1.21)
Photo (deceased)1220 (19.2)525 (43.0)162 (13.3)533 (43.7)0.96 (0.85–1.09)0.93 (0.82–1.05)
Photo (of someone looking sad)257 (4.0)118 (45.9)40 (15.6)99 (38.5)1.09 (0.85–1.41)1.17 (0.91–1.51)
Favourable characteristic (deceased)669 (10.5)296 (44.2)95 (14.2)278 (41.6)1.02 (0.87–1.20)1.03 (0.87–1.21)
Identifies deceased as a celebrity747 (11.7)367 (49.1)102 (13.7)278 (37.2)1.28 (1.10–1.49)1.26 (1.08–1.48)
Statement that suicide is inevitable44 (0.7)26 (59.1)4 (9.1)14 (31.8)1.86 (1.02–3.41)1.57 (0.83–2.96)
Exciting reporting151 (2.4)60 (39.7)19 (12.6)72 (47.7)0.84 (0.61–1.17)0.79 (0.58–1.10)
Glorified or romanticized suicide47 (0.7)16 (34.0)6 (12.8)25 (53.2)0.66 (0.36–1.21)0.64 (0.36–1.14)
Monocausal explanation for suicide941 (14.8)386 (41.0)128 (13.6)427 (45.4)0.88 (0.76–1.01)0.86 (0.75–0.99)
Statement of approval of suicide164 (2.6)75 (45.7)23 (14.0)66 (40.2)1.09 (0.80–1.48)1.08 (0.79–1.49)
Interview with the bereaved1199 (18.8)499 (41.6)152 (12.7)548 (45.7)0.90 (0.79–1.02)0.84 (0.74–0.95)
Putatively protective
Unfavourable characteristic (deceased)91 (1.4)32 (35.2)7 (7.7)52 (57.1)0.69 (0.45–1.07)0.54 (0.36–0.82)
Alternatives to suicide1194 (18.8)502 (42.0)196 (16.4)496 (41.5)0.92 (0.81–1.04)1.03 (0.91–1.17)
Community resources123 (1.9)48 (39.0)14 (11.4)61 (49.6)0.82 (0.57–1.18)0.74 (0.52–1.05)
Positive outcome of a suicide-related crisis85 (1.3)37 (43.5)11 (12.9)37 (43.5)0.99 (0.64–1.53)0.95 (0.61–1.46)
Warning signs of suicidal behaviour67 (1.1)32 (47.8)9 (13.4)26 (38.8)1.18 (0.73–1.91)1.15 (0.70–1.89)
How to approach someone13 (0.2)7 (53.8)1 (7.7)5 (38.5)1.50 (0.50–4.47)1.17 (0.38–3.57)
Message of hope282 (4.4)119 (42.2)46 (16.3)117 (41.5)0.94 (0.74–1.19)1.03 (0.81–1.31)
  • Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

  • * Harmful effect = comparisons of proportion of articles followed by increased suicides versus proportion of articles followed by no change or decreased suicides; ORs > 1 show a harmful effect.

  • Protective effect = comparisons of proportion of articles followed by decreased suicides versus proportion of articles followed by no change or increased suicides; ORs < 1 show a protective effect.

  • Favourable and unfavourable characteristics refer to statements in an article expressing positive or negative value judgments, respectively, about a person’s character, personality or behaviour.