Table 1:

Recent guideline recommendations for management of acute nonspecific low-back pain

TypeInterventionSize of effect*Quality of evidence*Endorsement
2016 UK guideline142017 US guideline15
NonpharmacologicAdvice to stay active v. bed restSmallModerate (2 RCTs)35YesYes
Massage v. sham treatmentModerateLow (2 RCTs)Yes, if part of an exercise programYes
Spinal manipulation v. inert treatmentNo effectLow (3 RCTs)Yes, if part of an exercise programYes
Acupuncture v. sham treatmentSmallLow (3 RCTs)Do not offerYes
Heat v. sham treatmentModerateModerate (4 RCTs)No mentionYes
Exercise v. usual careNo effectLow (6 RCTs)YesNo mention
Psychologically informed physiotherapy v. usual careNo trialsN/AYes, for those at high risk of poor outcomeNo mention
PharmacologicNSAIDs v. placeboSmallModerate (5 RCTs)YesYes, depending on patient preferences and drug risk profile
Muscle relaxants v. placeboSmallModerate (5 RCTs)No mentionYes, depending on patient preferences and drug risk profile
Opioids v. placeboNo trialsN/AYes, if NSAIDs are unsafe or ineffective; weak opioid onlyDo not offer
Paracetamol v. placeboNo effectHigh (2 RCTs)36Do not offerDo not offer
Systemic corticosteroids v. placeboNo effectLow (2 RCTs)No mentionDo not offer
  • Note: GRADE = Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, N/A = No evidence from RCTs, NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, RCT = randomized controlled trial.

  • * Based on 2017 American College of Physicians guideline summary of evidence except where otherwise noted. Comparisons are to placebo, sham treatment, no treatment or usual care, and on short-term pain outcomes.

  • Our summary of evidence used the GRADE approach.