Table 2:

Demographic characteristics, laboratory site and vaccination dose of cases and controls

CategoryNo. (%) screened womenp valueNo. (%) screened women
Controls
n = 8723
Cases
n = 1481
Low grade*
n = 1384
High grade
n = 97
Age, yr
 18458 (5.3)55 (3.7)0.04652 (3.8)3 (3.1)
 191729 (19.8)237 (16.0)226 (16.3)11 (11.3)
 203318 (38.0)576 (38.9)535 (38.7)41 (42.3)
 213218 (36.9)613 (41.4)571 (41.3)42 (43.3)
Neighbourhood income quintile
 1 (lowest)1597 (18.3)284 (19.2)0.4258 (18.6)26 (26.8)
 21811 (20.8)282 (19.0)261 (18.9)21 (21.6)
 31597 (18.3)252 (17.0)234 (16.9)18 (18.6)
 41826 (20.9)336 (22.7)320 (23.1)16 (16.5)
 5 (highest)1865 (21.4)324 (21.9)308 (22.3)16 (16.5)
 Missing27 (0.3)3 (0.2)3 (0.2)0 (0.0)
Residential address
 Rural2473 (28.4)400 (27.0)0.3380 (27.5)20 (20.6)
 Urban6223 (71.3)1078 (72.8)1001 (72.3)77 (79.4)
 Missing27 (0.3)3 (0.2)3 (0.2)0 (0.0)
Laboratory services
 Laboratory 1§3179 (36.4)768 (51.9)< 0.001708 (51.2)60 (61.9)
 Laboratory 25544 (63.6)713 (48.1)676 (48.8)37 (38.1)
Vaccination dose
 04794 (55.0)918 (62.0)846 (61.1)72 (74.2)
 1280 (3.2)47 (3.2)45 (3.3)2 (2.1)
 2407 (4.7)83 (5.6)82 (5.9)1 (1.0)
 ≥ 33242 (37.2)433 (29.2)411 (29.7)22 (22.7)
  • * Low-grade cases: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

  • High-grade cases: atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out a high-grade lesion; or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

  • Age when Pap test (worst result between Jan. 1, 2012, and Aug. 14, 2015) was performed.

  • § Laboratory in Calgary.

  • Laboratory in Edmonton.