Table 3:

Quality assessment of articles using QUADAS-215

StudyPatientIndex testReference standardFlow and timing
Random sampleNot case–controlProper exclusionPatients meet criteriaInterpret without reference resultsPrespecify thresholdMeet review questionCorrectly classifyInterpret without index testMeet review questionProper intervalReference standard for allSame reference standardAll participants analyzed
Studies assessing only diagnostic accuracy of the RUDAS (objective 1)
Storey et al.10YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Iype et al.21UnclearNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Studies assessing diagnostic accuracy of the RUDAS and comparing it with another cognitive assessment tool (objectives 1 and 2)
Rowland et al.22YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Basic et al.23YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Goncalves et al.24YesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Limpawattana et al.25YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Nielsen et al.26NoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Juwita et al.27UnclearYesYesYesUnclearYesYesYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Studies only comparing the RUDAS with another cognitive assessment tool (objective 2)
Pang et al.19YesYesYesYesNoUnclearYesNANAYesNANANAYes
Nielsen et al.28YesYesYesYesNANoYesNANAYesNANANAYes
Salari et al.20UnclearYesYesYesNoUnclearYesNANAYesNANANAYes
  • Note: NA = not applicable, QUADAS-2 - Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2.