Table 3:

Quality assessment of articles using QUADAS-2 (15)

StudyPatientIndex testReference standardFlow and timing
Random sampleNot case–controlProper exclusionPatients meet criteriaInterpret without reference resultsPrespecify thresholdMeet review questionCorrectly classifyInterpret without index testMeet review questionProper intervalReference standard for allSame reference standardAll participants analyzed
Studies assessing only diagnostic accuracy of the RUDAS (objective 1)
Storey et al. (10)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Iype et al. (21)UnclearNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Studies assessing diagnostic accuracy of the RUDAS and comparing it with another cognitive assessment tool (objectives 1 and 2)
Rowland et al. (22)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Basic et al. (23)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Goncalves et al. (24)YesYesYesYesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Limpawattana et al. (25)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Nielsen et al. (26)NoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Juwita et al. (27)UnclearYesYesYesUnclearYesYesYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Studies only comparing the RUDAS with another cognitive assessment tool (objective 2)
Pang et al. (19)YesYesYesYesNoUnclearYesNANAYesNANANAYes
Nielsen et al. (28)YesYesYesYesNANoYesNANAYesNANANAYes
Salari et al. (20)UnclearYesYesYesNoUnclearYesNANAYesNANANAYes
  • Note: NA = not applicable, QUADAS-2 - Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2.