Table 1:

Estimates for model parameters in cost-effectiveness analysis of diacetylmorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment for chronic, refractory opioid dependence

ParameterEstimateDistributionSource
Probability of health state transition
Methadone state
 Remain in methadone state*λ = 0.114, γ = 0.643WeibullBC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 40.923 (0.033)NormalBC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 50.965 (0.042)Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 60.952 (0.041)Normal
 Transition to relapse state95.9%BetaBC MMTOS
 Transition to abstinence state4.1%
Diacetylmorphine state
 Remain in diacetylmorphine state*λ = 0.061, γ = 0.761WeibullNAOMI
  Multiplier: Episode 40.923 (0.033)NormalBC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 50.965 (0.042)Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 60.952 (0.041)Normal
 Transition to relapse state§37.0%DirichletRehm et al. (44)
 Transition to abstinence state22.4%
 Transition to methadone state40.7%
Relapse state
 Remain in relapse state*λ = 0.091, γ = 0.672WeibullBC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 41.220 (0.048)NormalBC MMTOS
  Multiplier: Episode 51.350 (0.060)Normal
  Multiplier: Episode 61.442 (0.056)Normal
 Transition to treatment state1Fixed
Abstinence state
 Remain in abstinence state*λ = 0.089, γ = 0.797WeibullTermorshuizen et al. (12)
 Transition to relapse state1Fixed
Transition to death
Abstinence state, HIV negativeSee Appendix 1, Table A1FixedStatistics Canada (32)
Abstinence state, HIV positive, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD)1.47 (1.07, 2.01)NormalATCC (45)
Relapse state, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD)30.063 (3.169)NormalSpittal et al. (33)
Methadone state, relative risk, mean (SD)0.350 (0.087)NormalCaplehorn et al. (6)
Diacetylmorphine state, standardized mortality ratio, mean (SD)9.70 (0.17)NormalRehm et al. (34)
HIV seroconversion**
Treatment state, mean (SD)0.0028 (0.0010)BetaBayoumi et al. (38)
Relapse state, mean (SD)0.0364 (0.0146)Beta
Abstinence state, mean (SD)0.0007 (0.0001)Beta
QALYs††
Methadone or diacetylmorphine state0.852MVNNAOMI
Relapse state0.750MVNNAOMI
Abstinence state, HIV negativeSee Appendix 1, Table A15BetaJohnson et al. (46)
Abstinence state, HIV positive, mean (SD)0.77 (0.19)BetaAnis et al. (47)
Monthly costs,‡‡ Can$
Drug treatment
 Methadone, mean (SD)329.38 (24.46)NormalNAOMI, BC PNET
 Diacetylmorphine, mean (SD)1415.21 (25.68)NormalNAOMI
 HIV infection28.30FixedWood et al. (48) and Krentz et al. (49)
 Hepatitis C virus infection673.82FixedButt et al. (50) and BC PNET
Methadone or diacetylmorphine state§§
 Health resource utilization, HIV positive72.10MVNNAOMI
 Criminal involvement950.52MVNNAOMI
 Criminal charges398.82MVNNAOMI
Relapse state§§
 Health resource utilization, HIV positive695.98MVNNAOMI
 Criminal involvement8981.28MVNNAOMI
 Criminal charges590.05MVNNAOMI
  • Note: ATCC = Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration, BC MMTOS = British Columbia Methadone Maintenance Treatment Outcome Study, BC PNET = British Columbia PharmaNet database, MVN = multivariate normal, NAOMI = North American Opiate Medication Initiative, QALY = quality-adjusted life-year, SD = standard deviation. Appendix 1 is available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.110669/-/DC1.

  • * Parameter estimates provided for the time to discontinuation of each health state represent the shape (γ) and scale (λ) parameters of the Weibull distribution. From estimated survival functions, at 12 months, the probability of remaining in methadone treatment was about 47%, 68% in diacetylmorphine treatment, 62% in relapse and 52% in abstinence.

  • Derived from Cox proportional hazards frailty models on successive episodes of treatment and relapse. (36) All multipliers presented are hazard ratios and corresponding standard errors.

  • Change in duration of successive diacetylmorphine episodes was assumed to be equivalent to change in duration of successive methadone episodes.

  • § Included transition to methadone state (n = 379) and other treatment (n = 28) among all participants alive at the end of follow-up and not lost to follow-up (n = 1001).

  • Sex-specific estimates used in the model for HIV-negative individuals in the abstinence state are presented in Appendix Table A7. For monthly probabilities of death in the abstinence–HIV positive, diacetylmorphine and relapse states, we multiplied base probabilities by state-specific standardized mortality ratios; for monthly probabilities of death in the methadone state, we multiplied the base probabilities by standardized mortality ratios and relative risks.

  • ** Calculations and specific references for state-specific HIV seroconversion are shown in Appendix Table A5.

  • †† Calculations are shown in section A2.3 in Appendix Tables A13–A16.

  • ‡‡ Calculations are shown in section A2.2 in Appendix Tables A8–A14.

  • §§ For all costs related to health resource use, criminal involvement and criminal charges, trial-based data on utilization/frequency of events was multiplied by unit costs from several sources, detailed in Appendix Table A8. Presented state-specific costs are estimated mean values, given the mean age, HIV status and sex mix of participants in the NAOMI study. Costs were a function of each of these parameters in the cohort simulation model.