@article {DolovichE491, author = {Lisa Dolovich and Doug Oliver and Larkin Lamarche and Lehana Thabane and Ruta Valaitis and Gina Agarwal and Tracey Carr and Gary Foster and Lauren Griffith and Dena Javadi and Monika Kastner and Dee Mangin and Alexandra Papaioannou and Jenny Ploeg and Parminder Raina and Julie Richardson and Cathy Risdon and Pasqualina Santaguida and Sharon Straus and David Price}, title = {Combining volunteers and primary care teamwork to support health goals and needs of older adults: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial}, volume = {191}, number = {18}, pages = {E491--E500}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1503/cmaj.181173}, publisher = {CMAJ}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: The Health TAPESTRY (Health Teams Advancing Patient Experience: STRengthening QualitY) intervention was designed to improve primary care teamwork and promote optimal aging. We evaluated the effectiveness of Health TAPESTRY in attaining goals of older adults (e.g., physical activity, productivity, social connection, medical status) and other outcomes.METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial between January and October 2015 in a primary care practice in Hamilton, Ontario. Older adults were randomized (1:1) to Health TAPESTRY (n = 158) or control (n = 154). Trained community volunteers gathered information on people{\textquoteright}s goals, needs and risks in their homes, using electronic forms. Interprofessional primary care teams reviewed summaries and addressed issues. Participants reported goal attainment (primary outcome), self-efficacy, quality of life, optimal aging, social support, empowerment, physical activity, falls, and access to and comprehensiveness of the health system. We determined use of health care resources through chart audit.RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in goal attainment or many other patient-reported outcome and experience assessments at 6 months. More primary care visits took place in the intervention versus control group over 6 months (mean {\textpm} standard deviation [SD] 4.93 {\textpm} 3.86 v. 3.50 {\textpm} 3.53; difference of 1.52 [95\% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 2.19]). The odds of having 1 or more hospital admission were lower for the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] 0.44 [95\% CI 0.20 to 0.95]).INTERPRETATION: Health TAPESTRY did not improve the primary outcome of goal attainment but showed signals of shifting care from reactive to active preventive care. Further evaluation will help in understanding effective components, costs and consequences of the intervention. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02283723See related article at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.190406}, issn = {0820-3946}, URL = {https://www.cmaj.ca/content/191/18/E491}, eprint = {https://www.cmaj.ca/content/191/18/E491.full.pdf}, journal = {CMAJ} }