@article {BarkunE156, author = {Alan N. Barkun and Mamatha Bhat and David Armstrong and Martin Dawes and Allan Donner and Robert Enns and Janet Martin and Paul Moayyedi and Joseph Romagnuolo and Larry Stitt}, title = {Effectiveness of disseminating consensus management recommendations for ulcer bleeding: a cluster randomized trial}, volume = {185}, number = {3}, pages = {E156--E166}, year = {2013}, doi = {10.1503/cmaj.120095}, publisher = {CMAJ}, abstract = {Background: International guidelines for the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding have not been widely adopted in clinical practice. We sought to determine whether a national, multifaceted intervention could improve adherence to guidelines, especially for patients at high risk of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods: In this randomized trial, we stratified hospitals by region and size and allocated sites to either the control or experimental group. Health care workers in the experimental group were given published guidelines, generic algorithms, stratification scoring systems and written reminders and attended multidisciplinary guideline education groups and case-based workshops. These interventions were implemented over a 12-month period after randomization, with performance feedback and benchmarking. The primary outcome of adherence rates to key guidelines in endoscopic and pharmacologic management, determined by chart review, was adjusted according to site characteristics and possible within-site dependencies. We also report the rates of adherence to other recommendations.Results: Forty-three sites were randomized to the experimental (n = 21) or control (n = 22) groups. In our primary analysis, we compared patients before (experimental group: n = 402 patients; control group: n = 424 patients) and after (experimental group: n = 361 patients; control group: n = 389 patients) intervention. Patient-level analysis revealed no significant difference in adherence rates to the guidelines after the intervention (experimental group: 9.8\%; control group: 4.8\%; p = 0.99) after adjustment for the rate of adherence before the intervention (experimental group: 13.2\%; control group: 7.1\%). The adherence rates to other guidelines were similar and decreased over time, varying between 5\% and 93\%.Interpretation: This national knowledge translation{\textendash}based trial suggests poor adherence to guidelines on nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Adherence was not improved by an educational intervention, which highlights both the complexity and poor predictability of attempting to alter the behaviour of health care providers (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. MCT-88113).}, issn = {0820-3946}, URL = {https://www.cmaj.ca/content/185/3/E156}, eprint = {https://www.cmaj.ca/content/185/3/E156.full.pdf}, journal = {CMAJ} }