Jump to comment:
- Page navigation anchor for RE: Innovation indeedRE: Innovation indeed
The crisis and manpower free-fall of comprehensive community family physicians is well covered by the article. Both challenges in comprehensive care and increased interest in time/financial protected niche care have contributed to this....ignored multifactorial societal and personal evolutions. There are critical problems and missed opportunities of the current CFPC proposal.
As a very longstanding CCFP/FCFP member, I recall my residency choices for 'general practice' were either the FM specialty certification route of CFPC, or the minimal competency route of the 1-year rotating internship. The former was the comprehensive family systems program that I chose. The latter was for many either undecided, or just didn't want to bother with the extra training time in order to get out into the real world to start serving our communities. Since that time, rotating internships have been fully retired, and those who were licensed under that schema have largely been cajoled into practice-eligible CCFPs. The result is that while I have appreciated and supported CFPC's aspirations of excellence and comprehensive training, the fact is that society (and residents) have no minimum path to licensure and service. I am near full spectrum FM (no obs/ER) with many expanded areas of practice that will not be emphasized in any CFPC program. Most of my newer colleagues, and certainly most current students, don't want this, and as pointed out in the article,...
Show MoreCompeting Interests: None declared.References
- . 2023;:-.
- Page navigation anchor for RE: Canada’s crisis of primary care access: Is expanding residency training to 3 years a solution?RE: Canada’s crisis of primary care access: Is expanding residency training to 3 years a solution?
The move to extend family medicine residency training is yet another example of misguided ivory tower decision making.
As a new family doctor, I certainly had many moments where I felt uncomfortable during my first year, but no amount of extra training would have changed that. Irrespective of any residency length, there will always be a need for ongoing learning - it's why we have CME.Competing Interests: None declared.References
- . 2023;:-.
- Page navigation anchor for RE: Expansion...or Shortening?RE: Expansion...or Shortening?
As a GP who did his 2 years of Pre-Med and 4 years of medical school followed by a 12 month 'rotating internship' and then went to work for some 45 years as a Family Physician, non-specialist Anaesthetist and ER Physician with 4 years of Administrative Medicine thrown in, I would submit that there is no need to expand FP Residency Training.
I would strongly argue that our current crisis in family practice numbers would be best served by returning to a strong 1-year GP 'internship' program and getting the new doctors out into practice .
Our generation (Meds '67 & earlier) who followed this route served our patients well.
My 1 year internship was followed by starting up a practice (at age 25) that included full care of family members from newborns to grandparents, more than 900 obstetrical deliveries in 11 years, serving as surgical assistant for my patients, anaesthesia services in a community hospital (alongside fellowship holders), ER coverage (long before we had full-time ER docs), and a spell doing tonsillectomies and adenoidectomies until we could recruit an ENT specialist to town.
All the GPs in our community followed similar paths.
And we did this relying on our medical school training, 'junior rotating internship', peer interactions, community consultants, regular continuing medical education program attendance and the ongoing development of experience in practice.
Today's grad...
Show MoreCompeting Interests: None declared.