Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice
Open Access

Duodenal duplication cyst in a 61-year-old man

Jinpei Dong, Dapeng Bian and Qiushi Feng
CMAJ March 20, 2023 195 (11) E411-E412; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.221387
Jinpei Dong
Departments of Gastroenterology (Dong), Endoscopy (Bian) and General Surgery (Feng), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dapeng Bian
Departments of Gastroenterology (Dong), Endoscopy (Bian) and General Surgery (Feng), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiushi Feng
Departments of Gastroenterology (Dong), Endoscopy (Bian) and General Surgery (Feng), Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 61-year-old man had acute pancreatitis 5 years previously. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed a cystic mass at the second part of the duodenum. Surgery was suggested, but the patient declined. Over the subsequent 5 years, he had 4 additional episodes of acute pancreatitis before presenting to our surgery clinic requesting curative treatment of the cystic mass. He was asymptomatic, and physical examination, complete blood count, liver enzyme levels and amylase and lipase levels were normal. A CT scan of the abdomen in our centre showed that the mass had not changed (Figure 1A). Endoscopic ultrasonography showed an anechoic lesion with a 5-layer wall (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.221387/tab-related-content) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed that the pancreatic and bile ducts were confluent in the cyst (Figure 1B and Appendix 1, Figure B). Tests of the patient’s cystic fluid showed amylase levels above 10 000 IU/L, lipase levels above 1500 U/L, total bilirubin 83.3 μmol/L and total bile acid 2212.06 μmol/L. These results were all much higher than normal values in plasma and suggested to us that the bile and pancreatic secretions drained into the cyst, and that the cyst was likely the cause of the patient’s recurrent pancreatitis.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1:

(A) A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen of a 61-year-old man, showing a cystic mass (2.3 × 1.6 × 4.0 cm) at the second part of the duodenum (white arrow). (B) An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography examination showed that the pancreatic duct and common bile duct were confluent in the cyst. The bold white arrow shows the ampulla of Vater. The thin white arrows show the CBD and PD, respectively. Note: CBD = common bile duct, DDC = duodenal duplication cyst, PD = pancreatic duct.

We endoscopically resected the lesion, and histopathology showed a duodenal duplication cyst (Appendix 1, Figure C). A repeat endoscopy after 3 months showed that the orifices of the bile duct and pancreatic duct were separate (Appendix 1, Figure D). The patient had no episodes of acute pancreatitis during 15 months of follow-up after resection.

A duodenal duplication cyst is a congenital malformation with an estimated prevalence of less than 1 per 100 000 live births1 and is most commonly diagnosed in infancy and childhood. The most common complication is pancreatitis and the main differential diagnosis is choledochocele. On histology, a duodenal duplication cyst is covered on both sides by duodenal mucosa with a distinct layer of smooth muscle in between, whereas a choledochocele is covered by either bile duct or gallbladder mucosa, with no smooth muscle layer.2 During endoscopic ultrasonography, a duodenal duplication cyst appears anechoic with a wall of 3–5 layers. A specific finding is muscular peristalsis of the cyst wall, seen on duodenoscopy. Malignant transformation of duodenal duplication cysts has been reported, but is uncommon.3 The optimal treatment is complete resection; endoscopic treatment is less invasive than surgery but patients recover more quickly.

Clinical images are chosen because they are particularly intriguing, classic or dramatic. Submissions of clear, appropriately labelled high-resolution images must be accompanied by a figure caption. A brief explanation (300 words maximum) of the educational importance of the images with minimal references is required. The patient’s written consent for publication must be obtained before submission.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • The authors have obtained patient consent.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chen J-J,
    2. Lee H-C,
    3. Yeung C-Y,
    4. et al
    . Meta-analysis: the clinical features of the duodenal duplication cyst. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1598–606.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Dipasquale V,
    2. Barraco P,
    3. Faraci S,
    4. et al
    . Duodenal duplication cysts in children: clinical features and current treatment choices. Biomed Hub 2020;5:152–64.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Seeliger B,
    2. Piardi T,
    3. Marzano E,
    4. et al
    . Duodenal duplication cyst: a potentially malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:3753–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 195 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 195, Issue 11
20 Mar 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Duodenal duplication cyst in a 61-year-old man
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Duodenal duplication cyst in a 61-year-old man
Jinpei Dong, Dapeng Bian, Qiushi Feng
CMAJ Mar 2023, 195 (11) E411-E412; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221387

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Duodenal duplication cyst in a 61-year-old man
Jinpei Dong, Dapeng Bian, Qiushi Feng
CMAJ Mar 2023, 195 (11) E411-E412; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221387
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Management of γ-hydroxybutyrate intoxication and withdrawal
  • Tuberculous monoarthritis of the knee joint
  • Vulvar condyloma lata as a first presentation of syphilis
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Article Types
    • Clinical Images
  • Topics
    • Gastroenterology
    • Pediatrics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire