Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Review
Open Access

Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: diagnosis, risk stratification and management

Jeffrey J. Perry, Krishan Yadav, Shahbaz Syed and Michel Shamy
CMAJ October 11, 2022 194 (39) E1344-E1349; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220344
Jeffrey J. Perry
Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Syed), University of Ottawa; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Shamy), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry, Yadav, Shamy); Division of Neurology (Shamy), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krishan Yadav
Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Syed), University of Ottawa; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Shamy), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry, Yadav, Shamy); Division of Neurology (Shamy), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shahbaz Syed
Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Syed), University of Ottawa; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Shamy), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry, Yadav, Shamy); Division of Neurology (Shamy), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Shamy
Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Syed), University of Ottawa; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine (Perry, Yadav, Shamy), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry, Yadav, Shamy); Division of Neurology (Shamy), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MD MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

See related article at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.221415

KEY POINTS
  • Patients with suspected cerebral ischemia should be urgently assessed to distinguish between transient ischemic attack (TIA), minor stroke or mimics such as migraine, seizure, vertigo or syncope.

  • The Canadian TIA Score can be used to determine risk for early subsequent stroke in patients with a suspected TIA or minor stroke.

  • All patients with TIA or minor stroke should undergo urgent electrocardiography and computed tomography of the head.

  • Clinicians should order early vascular imaging for patients at moderate or high risk of subsequent stroke; urgent revascularization should be considered if there is more than 50% arterial stenosis congruent with symptom presentation.

  • Clinicians should prescribe dual antiplatelet drugs for high-risk patients, single antiplatelet agents for low-risk patients or direct oral anticoagulants for patients with atrial fibrillation.

  • All patients with TIA or minor stroke should be counselled about modifiable lifestyle factors (including smoking cessation), be treated with statins and take steps toward optimizing blood pressure, including treatment with antihypertensive drugs, if necessary.

Suspected transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is a relatively common presentation in emergency departments and primary care clinics. Secondary stroke prevention has evolved substantially over the last 20 years, such that the risk of stroke within 90 days of a TIA or minor stroke has fallen from 10% to as low as 1% with optimized and expedited management.1–4

The nomenclature surrounding TIA is inconsistent, which can cause confusion. However, 2 definitions are commonly used. One is based on time (i.e., symptom resolution within 24 hours), and the other is based on the appearance of tissue (i.e., no infarction on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]).5,6 A recent proposal has argued that it is not important to differentiate TIA from minor stroke, given their common pathophysiology, suggested investigations and management, when thrombolysis or thrombectomy are not indicated.7 Acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome has been proposed as a term that includes both TIA and minor stroke.

Nomenclature aside, clinicians must distinguish cerebral ischemic events from stroke mimics (i.e., diagnoses that can resemble TIA or minor stroke), and begin stroke prevention measures in at-risk patients.8,9 About half of initial diagnoses of TIA or minor stroke are ultimately diagnosed as a stroke mimic.10

Once patients are determined to have TIA or minor stroke, a series of investigations and assessments are needed to ascertain the cause as this determines management. Making an accurate diagnosis and identifying high-risk patients in a timely manner is critical to decrease the likelihood of a subsequent event. We discuss the investigation and management of acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome based on recent high-quality evidence, position statements and official guidance (Box 1).

Box 1: Evidence used in this review

We reviewed recent position statements for the investigation and management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. These included the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Secondary Prevention of Stroke Update 2020 and the American Heart Association’s 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. For articles describing specific mechanisms and treatments, we searched MEDLINE to February 2022, using terms such as “TIA,” “transient ischemic attack” and “stroke.” We primarily considered original articles, but also review articles. We further searched the reference lists of relevant articles to find other articles of interest.

How is transient ischemic attack or minor stroke diagnosed?

The diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke can be challenging and starts with taking a careful and focused history (Figure 1). Classically, a TIA or minor stroke presents with sudden onset of loss of function. Unilateral weakness, aphasia or dysarthria are strongly associated with a high likelihood of TIA or minor stroke. Symptoms are usually not progressive, repetitive, stereotyped or stepwise (e.g., starting in the face, then moving to the arm and then the leg). Although stuttering symptoms, whereby severity fluctuates over a few hours, can occur with small-vessel lacunar strokes, these would not be expected to last beyond 24 hours. Symptoms are usually negative rather than positive; for example, they involve the loss of vision rather than flashing lights, or the loss of feeling rather than electric shocks. Diagnosis is challenging when information is incomplete (e.g., because of language discordance or poor memory) or when patients present with a combination of typical and atypical features.11 Recent studies suggest that clinicians may be less likely to diagnose TIA or minor stroke in women presenting with atypical symptoms than in men, although women have just as high a chance of having cerebral ischemia.12,13 Even low-risk transient events may be associated with infarction on MRI; a recent cohort study found a rate of 13.5%.14 Although some low-risk patients do have cerebral ischemia and would potentially benefit from early imaging, it is not currently clear what impact more widespread MRI scanning would have on health care costs and emergency department crowding or subsequent stroke rates.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1:

Diagnosis and management of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. Note: ASA = acetylsalicylic acid, CT = computed tomography, ECG = electrocardiography.

Common mimics of TIA or minor stroke include migraine, peripheral vertigo, syncope, somatization and seizure.10 Symptoms more commonly seen in patients with a stroke mimic include loss of consciousness, vertigo, bilateral symptoms and confusion.10 Because the resources available to urgently risk-stratify patients for the likelihood of subsequent stroke are limited, physicians should carefully consider other diagnoses before starting such investigations. Some hospitals routinely order an urgent MRI scan given that the longer symptoms are present, the more likely there will be acute ischemic changes on MRI. However, the cost–benefit ratio and the impact of this strategy on subsequent stroke prevention is currently unknown.

How should suspected transient ischemic attack or minor stroke be urgently investigated?

The highest-risk period for a subsequent stroke in patients with TIA or minor stroke is in the first few days after the initial event; the median time is 24 hours.15 Thus, investigations should be done within hours.

Risk stratification

Several scoring systems can be used to identify high-risk patients and guide the prioritization of testing and specialist evaluation. The Canadian TIA Score (Figure 2) has been derived and validated in 2 large, multicentre cohort studies to accurately stratify patients with TIA or minor stroke as low-, medium- or high-risk for a subsequent stroke within 7 days.16,17 Low-risk patients have a risk of less than 1%, medium-risk patients have a 1%–5% risk and high-risk patients have a risk of more than 5% for a subsequent stroke within 7 days. A reasonable clinical approach is to arrange urgent vascular imaging for medium- and high-risk patients, and to discuss high-risk patients with a stroke specialist during their initial evaluation. Most low-risk patients can be managed as outpatients.

Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2:

The Canadian Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) score.16 Note: BP = blood pressure, CT = computed tomography, ECG = electrocardiography, ED = emergency department.

The Canadian TIA Score contains 13 clinical or basic investigation variables that are assigned different weights. Free calculators are available through phone applications, such as the Ottawa Rule App, to assist clinicians. The Canadian TIA Score outperformed both the ABCD2 (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms and diabetes) and the ABCD2i (age, blood pressure, clinical features, duration of symptoms, diabetes and infarction) scores, which are relatively simple and widely recognized tools (absolute net reclassification index, which quantifies how well a new model reclassifies cases compared with an old model, of 12.0% and 8.5% over ABCD2 and ABCD2i, respectively; 16.3% of patients classified as low risk with Canadian TIA Score v. 0% classified as low risk using ABCD2 or ABCD2i).16

Neuroimaging

Urgent brain imaging is critical to the assessment of patients with TIA or minor stroke. The Canadian Stroke Best Practice guideline calls for noncontrast computed tomography (CT) of the head to be done immediately for all patients with TIA or minor stroke to assess for stroke mimics and to help determine risk of a subsequent stroke.8 A multicentre cohort study of 1028 patients determined that the patients with abnormalities on CT (an acute cerebral infarction alone, acute plus old infarction, or acute infarction, old infarction and microangiopathy) are at risk for subsequent stroke within 90 days that is 3, 11 and 24 times higher than those with a normal CT, respectively.18 As the sensitivity of CT for TIA or minor stroke is poor, MRI provides additional information but is not immediately available in many Canadian centres.14 Given a relative lack of MRI availability and of clear evidence on the impact of routine MRI, we suggest using the modality that is locally available for neuroimaging, which will be CT in most places.

Vascular imaging

Neck and brain vascular imaging can identify extracranial carotid stenosis, intracranial or posterior circulation stenosis, acute thrombus or cervical artery dissection. It is vital to identify patients with more than 50% stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery with CT angiography or Doppler ultrasonography, as they are at highest risk of subsequent major stroke.19 Given that about half of patients suspected of TIA or stroke actually have a stroke mimic as the cause of their symptoms, it is not a good use of resources to urgently seek imaging for all low-risk patients.10 These patients can either forgo imaging or have imaging performed within days after their index event, depending on the likelihood of the primary event being a true TIA or stroke.

Electrocardiography and Holter monitoring

Electrocardiography (ECG) to screen for atrial fibrillation or flutter should be done immediately for all patients. If the ECG is normal, patients may still be at risk of stroke owing to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Subsequent Holter monitoring or loop recording increases the likelihood of identifying atrial fibrillation. Monitoring for up to 14 days in patients with no other cause of their index TIA or stroke identifies more people with atrial fibrillation.20

Echocardiography

Outpatient transthoracic echocardiography can identify cardioembolic causes of TIA or minor stroke other than atrial fibrillation, such as left ventricular akinesis, poor ejection fraction, atrial myxoma, patent foramen ovale (PFO), atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects and left ventricular thrombus. Because the prevalence of these findings is low, the yield of echocardiography in identifying a treatment-changing cause of stroke is also low. However, positive findings are often important. Because of the low prevalence, no clear recommendations exist to clarify which patients require echocardiography.8 Patients younger than 60 years with a moderate-to-large PFO should be evaluated by a stroke specialist to determine if the PFO is related to the TIA or minor stroke and if it warrants closure.8 Transesophageal echocardiography is generally reserved for patients with an abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram who need detailed assessment of valvular structures or the atrial septal anatomy for planned procedural intervention.

What are the management options for secondary stroke prevention?

Carotid revascularization

Patients with a recent TIA or minor stroke and more than 50% stenosis of the extracranial carotid arteries are at the highest risk of recurrence; the median time to recurrence is 24 hours.15,21 Carotid intervention (carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting) is extremely effective at preventing stroke in these patients; it reduces the absolute risk of subsequent stroke by 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–24%; with a number needed to treat of 6) in patients with 50%–99% stenosis when treated within 2 weeks of TIA or stroke.9,22 The benefit decreases over time, with no benefit from treatment after 3 months.23 Thus, systems must be in place to identify patients who are candidates for carotid intervention and to intervene quickly.

Antiplatelet agents

The findings of 2 large randomized controlled trials suggest that 21 days of dual antiplatelet therapy (80–81 mg/d acetylsalicylic acid [ASA] and 75 mg/d clopidogrel) is superior to ASA alone for preventing stroke in medium- and high-risk patients.24,25 Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 21 days is not routinely encouraged as this increases the risk of major bleeding. Single-agent ASA (80–81 mg/d) is appropriate first-line therapy for lower-risk patients, and for most patients after 21 days of dual antiplatelet therapy. When patients have recurrent cerebrovascular events despite antiplatelet therapy, it is important to consider the possibility of alternate causes such as atrial fibrillation, genetic resistance to clopidogrel metabolism or medication nonadherence. When starting antiplatelet therapy, a loading dose should be given (160 mg ASA and either 300 mg or 600 mg clopidogrel). Ticagrelor is an acceptable alternative to clopidogrel for dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA.26,27

Anticoagulation for patients with atrial dysrhythmia

Treatment with anticoagulation results in a 66% relative risk reduction for subsequent stroke among patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation after a TIA or minor stroke.28 In the absence of active bleeding or moderate-to-large acute infarction on CT (i.e., any lesion > 1.5 cm in the anterior or posterior circulation), 29 anticoagulation can be started immediately. A direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is recommended over warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation unless contraindicated (e.g., severe renal impairment [creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min], drug interactions). Follow-up imaging is recommended (usually within 3–7 d) before starting anticoagulation in patients with moderate-to-large infarctions on the initial scan to ensure lack of hemorrhagic transformation. These patients can be started on anticoagulation after 14 days.9

Antihypertensive management

Hypertension is responsible for 39.9% (95% CI 12.5–47.4) of total stroke burden.30,31 Thus, it is one of the most important modifiable risk factors to prevent a subsequent stroke. Optimal targets for systolic and diastolic blood pressure are not known, although a blood pressure lower than 140/90 mm Hg reduces the risk of subsequent stroke.8 If a patient’s symptoms have resolved, no substantial (i.e., > 50%) large artery stenosis is present on vascular imaging, and the patient’s blood pressure is persistently above 140/90 mm Hg, it is reasonable to consider starting antihypertensive drugs immediately.32 If symptoms persist, substantial stenosis is present or no vascular imaging has been conducted, advice from a stroke specialist would be prudent. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor with thiazide or a thiazide-like diuretic is recommended, with a calcium-channel blocker as an alternative.8

Statins

All patients with a noncardioembolic TIA or minor stroke, without contraindications and without adverse effects, should be treated with a statin.8 Using a high-dose statin (i.e., atorvastatin 80 mg/d or simvastatin 40 mg/d) is associated with a 1.5%–1.9% absolute risk reduction of subsequent stroke after a median 2.5 years of follow-up.33

Additional measures

It is important to assess all patients for smoking, physical activity, weight and diabetes, and address these risk factors so as to reduce the risk of subsequent stroke. For those with diabetes, a glycated hemoglobin should be assessed, targeting a level below 7.0%.8

Conclusion

Acute cerebral ischemia is a neurologic emergency. A careful history and examination and selected tests can usually differentiate acute cerebrovascular ischemia from stroke mimics. Once diagnosed, it is important to obtain a CT scan and ECG immediately if the event is recent or ongoing. Risk stratification using the Canadian TIA Score will identify low-risk patients who can be managed less urgently, often by their family physician. Medium- and high-risk patients should undergo urgent vascular imaging. High-risk patients should be discussed with a stroke specialist at the time of initial assessment. Patients with carotid stenosis of 50%–99% corresponding to their symptoms, should be referred immediately for surgical consideration. Patients with atrial fibrillation should be started on anticoagulation, usually a DOAC. Clinicians should consider all other patients for a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy, although ASA alone may be appropriate for low-risk patients or those at high-risk of bleeding. Further risk reduction is needed for patients with additional risk factors.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Jeffrey Perry and Michel Shamy report funding from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, as well as participation on the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Guidelines group. Michel Shamy also reports funding from the New Frontiers in Research Fund, participation on the data safety monitoring board of the FRONTIERS trial and participation on Canadian Stroke Consortium ethics committee. No other competing interests were declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: All of the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work, drafted the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Gress DR,
    3. Browner WS,
    4. et al
    . Short-term prognosis after emergency department diagnosis of TIA. JAMA 2000;284:2901–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Giles MF,
    3. Chandratheva A,
    4. et al
    . Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison [published erratum in Lancet 2008;371:386] Lancet 2007;370:1432–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Amarenco P,
    2. Lavallee PC,
    3. Labreuche J,
    4. et al
    . One-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1533–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lavallée PC,
    2. Meseguer E,
    3. Abboud H,
    4. et al
    . A transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-the-clock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:953–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:105–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Easton JD,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. et al
    . Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009;40:2276–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Easton JD,
    2. Johnston SC
    . Time to retire the concept of transient ischemic attack. JAMA 2022;327:813–4.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Gladstone DJ,
    2. Lindsay MP,
    3. Douketis J,
    4. et al.
    Canadian Stroke Consortium. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: secondary prevention of stroke update 2020. Can J Neurol Sci 2022;49:315–37.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Kleindorfer DO,
    2. Towfighi A,
    3. Chaturvedi S,
    4. et al
    . 2021 Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021;52:e364–e467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cortel-LeBlanc MA,
    2. Sharma M,
    3. Cortel-LeBlanc A,
    4. et al
    . Predictors of neurologists confirming or overturning emergency physicians’ diagnosis of TIA or stroke. CJEM 2021;23:812–9.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Fitzpatrick T,
    2. Gocan S,
    3. Wang CQ,
    4. et al
    . How do neurologists diagnose transient ischemic attack: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 2019;14:115–24.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Yu AYX,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Asdaghi N,
    4. et al
    . Sex differences in diagnosis and diagnostic revision of suspected minor cerebral ischemic events. Neurology 2021; 96:e732–9.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Gocan S,
    2. Fitzpatrick T,
    3. Wang CQ,
    4. et al
    . Diagnosis of transient ischemic attack: sex-specific differences from a retrospective cohort study. Stroke 2020; 51:3371–4.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Coutts SB,
    2. Moreau F,
    3. Asdaghi N,
    4. et al
    . Rate and prognosis of brain ischemia in patients with lower-risk transient or persistent minor neurologic events. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:1439–45.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Coutts SB,
    2. Modi J,
    3. Patel SK,
    4. et al
    . CT/CT angiography and MRI findings predict recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: results of the prospective CATCH study. Stroke 2012;43:1013–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Perry JJ,
    2. Sivilotti MLA,
    3. Emond M,
    4. et al
    . Prospective validation of Canadian TIA score and comparison with ABCD2 and ABCD2i for subsequent stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack: multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 2021 Feb 4; 372:n49. doi:10.1136/bmj.n49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Perry JJ,
    2. Sharma M,
    3. Sivilotti ML,
    4. et al
    . A prospective cohort study of patients with transient ischemic attack to identify high-risk clinical characteristics. Stroke 2014;45:92–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Wasserman JK,
    2. Perry JJ,
    3. Sivilotti ML,
    4. et al
    . Computed tomography identifies patients at high risk for stroke after transient ischemic attack/nondisabling stroke: prospective, multicenter cohort study. Stroke 2015;46:114–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Kamal N,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Blacquiere DP,
    4. et al
    . Rapid assessment and treatment of transient ischemic attacks and minor stroke in Canadian emergency departments: time for a paradigm shift. Stroke 2015;46:2987–90.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Gladstone DJ,
    2. Spring M,
    3. Dorian P,
    4. et al
    . Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2467–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Purroy F,
    2. Montaner J,
    3. Molina CA,
    4. et al
    . Patterns and predictors of early risk of recurrence after transient ischemic attack with respect to etiologic subtypes. Stroke 2007;38:3225–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Gutnikov SA,
    4. et al
    . Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet 2004;363:915–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Rerkasem A,
    2. Orrapin S,
    3. Howard DP,
    4. et al
    . Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;9:CD001081.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Easton JD,
    3. Farrant M,
    4. et al
    . Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med 2018;379:215–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Pan Y,
    3. Zhao X,
    4. et al
    . Clopidogrel with Aspirin in Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (CHANCE) trial: one-year outcomes. Circulation 2015;132:40–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Lun R,
    2. Dhaliwal S,
    3. Zitikyte G,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with minor ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2022;79:141–8.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Meng X,
    3. Wang A,
    4. et al
    . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with stroke or TIA. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2520–30.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Secondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Lancet 1993;342:1255–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Paciaroni M,
    2. Agnelli G,
    3. Corea F,
    4. et al
    . Early hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarction: rate, predictive factors, and influence on clinical outcome: results of a prospective multicenter study. Stroke 2008;39:2249–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Clark D III.,
    2. Colantonio LD,
    3. Min YI,
    4. et al
    . Population-attributable risk for cardiovascular disease associated with hypertension in Black adults. JAMA Cardiol 2019;4:1194–202.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Willey JZ,
    2. Moon YP,
    3. Kahn E,
    4. et al
    . Population attributable risks of hypertension and diabetes for cardiovascular disease and stroke in the northern Manhattan study. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e001106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Boulanger JM,
    2. Lindsay MP,
    3. Gubitz G,
    4. et al
    . Canadian Stroke best practice recommendations for acute stroke management: prehospital, emergency department, and acute inpatient stroke care, 6th edition, update 2018. Int J Stroke 2018;13:949–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Tramacere I,
    2. Boncoraglio GB,
    3. Banzi R,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of statins for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019;17:67.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 194 (39)
CMAJ
Vol. 194, Issue 39
11 Oct 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: diagnosis, risk stratification and management
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: diagnosis, risk stratification and management
Jeffrey J. Perry, Krishan Yadav, Shahbaz Syed, Michel Shamy
CMAJ Oct 2022, 194 (39) E1344-E1349; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220344

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: diagnosis, risk stratification and management
Jeffrey J. Perry, Krishan Yadav, Shahbaz Syed, Michel Shamy
CMAJ Oct 2022, 194 (39) E1344-E1349; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220344
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • How is transient ischemic attack or minor stroke diagnosed?
    • How should suspected transient ischemic attack or minor stroke be urgently investigated?
    • What are the management options for secondary stroke prevention?
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • A practical approach to the acute management of patients with likely cerebral ischemia
  • Accident ischémique transitoire et AVC mineur: diagnostic, stratification du risque et prise en charge
  • Approche pratique en matière de prise en charge aiguë des cas probables d’ischémie cérébrale
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnosis and management of toxicity associated with the recreational use of nitrous oxide
  • A practical approach to the diagnosis and management of chlamydia and gonorrhea
  • Nonsurgical management of major hemorrhage
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cardiology: hypertension
    • Emergency medicine
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care
    • Internal medicine
    • Neurology
    • Stroke

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire