Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters
Open Access

Building research infrastructure across a health service

Stephen R. Hanney
CMAJ March 01, 2021 193 (9) E315; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.77958
Stephen R. Hanney
Professor emeritus, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

François Lamontagne and colleagues very usefully raise important questions about how health research in Canada might be better organized to enhance its impact on clinical practice.1 Given the achievements of health research in the United Kingdom during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the authors rightly laud the Clinical Research Network infrastructure for facilitating research that leads to key advances.

There are additional reasons for building research infrastructure widely across a health service. In England, National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the cancer research network that participated in colorectal cancer trials had lower mortality rates from colorectal cancer than other hospitals, after adjusting for case mix and hospital-level variables. This trend was not restricted to academic centres or large hospitals, but there was a dose effect.2 The effect of research engagement on health care performance, though, is not unique to England or to research networks. A review of global literature on research engagement by health care providers found that North America provided the majority of studies reporting improved health care performance associated with clinicians or health care organizations that were active in research.3

That leads to the observation that perhaps the most important aspect of Dame Sally Davies’ formation of the English National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) was not the adoption of any one specific element, but rather the creation of the overall system. This achievement was recognized in a recent review by the World Health Organization (WHO) that identified the NIHR as a world leader in implementing a comprehensive and coherent strategy to undertake the 4 main research system functions of governance, funding, building capacity and production and use of evidence.4

For example, building research networks across the NHS partly balanced the emphasis on funding a small number of Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs) to host leading medical academics who would spearhead research and translation. Many major scientific advances have come from BRCs. The University of Oxford’s BRC supports the RECOVERY trial, led by the university and involving investigators and clinical centres across the NIHR’s Clinical Research Network. BRCs helped the NIHR secure buy-in from leading medical academics, essential for the system to work in the context of some unease about focusing research agendas to meet NHS needs.

Lamontagne and colleagues identified challenges and progress in Canada, including clinical networks in Alberta. The WHO review provided more evidence of progress in Canada. First, the role of the Alberta networks in enhancing the translation and impact of research has been analyzed using the WHO’s systems approach.5 The WHO review also noted the pioneering comprehensive health research strategy developed in British Columbia through extensive stakeholder engagement, and the important role of McMaster University in evidence synthesis and translation (which has crucially continued during the pandemic).

Finally, it is worth recalling that a key influence behind the developments that led to the NIHR was the belief that clinical practice should be driven by evidence. This belief, of course, goes back to McMaster and Dr. David Sackett (who then went to the University of Oxford).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lamontagne F,
    2. Rowan KM,
    3. Guyatt G
    . Integrating research into clinical practice: challenges and solutions for Canada. CMAJ 2021;193:E127–31.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Downing A,
    2. Morris EJA,
    3. Corrigan N,
    4. et al
    . High hospital research participation and improved colorectal cancer survival outcomes: a population-based study. Gut 2017;66:89–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Boaz A,
    2. Hanney S,
    3. Jones T,
    4. et al
    . Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Hanney S,
    2. Kanya L,
    3. Pokhrel S,
    4. et al
    . What is the evidence on policies, interventions and tools for establishing and/or strengthening national health research systems and their effectiveness? [Internet] Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020. (Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report, No. 69.) SUMMARY. Available: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558507/ (accessed 2020 Dec. 21).
  5. ↵
    1. Hanney SR,
    2. Ovseiko PV,
    3. Graham KER,
    4. et al
    . A systems approach for optimizing implementation to impact: meeting report and proceedings of the 2019 In the Trenches: Implementation to Impact International Summit. BMC Proc 2020;14:10.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 193 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 193, Issue 9
1 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Building research infrastructure across a health service
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Building research infrastructure across a health service
Stephen R. Hanney
CMAJ Mar 2021, 193 (9) E315; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.77958

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Building research infrastructure across a health service
Stephen R. Hanney
CMAJ Mar 2021, 193 (9) E315; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.77958
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Integrating research into clinical practice: challenges and solutions for Canada
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Respiratory syncytial virus and palivizumab prophylaxis in the COVID-19 era
  • Eliminating racism in research
  • Transitioning to outpatient arthroplasty during COVID-19: time to pivot
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire