Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities
Open Access

Is this hair professional enough?

Samantha Bizimungu
CMAJ February 16, 2021 193 (7) E254-E255; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.201871
Samantha Bizimungu
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I was eight years old when my mother sent me to school with Bantu knots in my hair. This hairstyle, which originated with the Zulu people of southern Africa, was worn for centuries on the African continent before becoming widely adopted by the diaspora.

I returned home that afternoon in tears. My classmates, unaccustomed to a hairstyle of that sort, had spent all day laughing, pointing and comparing my hair to excrement. The tiny shred of pride I had had in my natural kinky-textured hair was crushed. I told my mother never to style it like that again and begged her for a chemical hair relaxer; she finally caved in about two years later.

I spent the ensuing years, into early adulthood, chemically straightening my hair and adopting a variety of protective styles: braids, cornrows, hair extensions and wigs. Women of African descent commonly use these styles to protect our hair from overmanipulation and to permit undisrupted growth of the hair.

Unfortunately, these styles, along with the use of chemical relaxers for permanent hair straightening, have been strongly linked to a form of hair loss known as traction alopecia. One study found that a third of Black women suffer from this condition, which can lead to permanent hair loss if not detected and treated early.1 In addition, Black women who use relaxers have been shown to have a higher likelihood of developing uterine fibroids.2

There is a general knowledge of the harm caused by these practices, but not much has been done to raise awareness on the topic in Black communities. In fact, it is often implied that in order to attain a certain level of professional and societal success, Black women must conform to Eurocentric standards of beauty by opting for straightened hairstyles over natural, Afro-textured ones.3 Like most Black women in my environment, I subscribed to that belief and happily shelled out hundreds of dollars in pursuit of these looks.

Figure
Image copyright iStock.com/GeorgePeters. No standalone file use permitted.

The early 2000s saw a resurgence of the “natural hair movement” in Black communities around the globe. It originated during the Black Power movement of the 1960s, and uplifts and encourages people of African descent to wear their hair in its naturally wavy, curly or coiled state. YouTubers and natural-hair bloggers were instrumental in bringing to the masses the tools and information needed to properly care for and style Afro-textured hair.

The end of my undergraduate degree and the beginning of my journey in medicine coincided with this period of celebration of natural Black hair. After contemplating going natural for a while, I ultimately relaxed my hair again a few weeks before my first semester of medical school. Despite feeling inspired by the natural hair movement and aware of the dangers of chemical relaxers, I was still convinced that my straight hair and extensions were more acceptable for a medical setting and would allow me to blend in as much as possible.

Two years into medical school, after numerous painful and costly braiding sessions and weave installations, I finally decided to go for the “big chop”: all the relaxed ends were cut off, leaving only natural, unprocessed hair. I planned this cut to coincide with my summer vacation so as to avoid intrusive comments from colleagues about the drastic change. It was freeing to let go of those damaged strands and embrace my short, tightly coiled locks for the first time. After ten years of wearing hair extensions and chemically altering the texture of my hair, I had forgotten what my natural hair truly looked like.

When fall came, my newfound hairstyle was met with compliments and innocent curiosity by my peers. At the start of clerkship, however, I had qualms about whether my short Afro hair would be deemed professional enough for a clinical setting. On several occasions when I was mistaken for a nurse, an orderly or a janitor, I asked myself if — on top of my visibly Black skin — my hairstyle did not fit with society’s image of a doctor-to-be.

My experience is, luckily, far from the worst. A 2018 study found that hair was a common theme associated with microaggressions experienced by minority resident physicians in the workplace.4 The United States Army made headlines in 2014 when its new grooming policy formally banned hairstyles such as Afros, braids and cornrows (www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/army-hairstyle_n_5070180?ri18n=true). In 2013, a seven-year-old girl in Tulsa, Oklahoma, was sent home from school because her dreadlocks were deemed a distraction for her classmates (www.today.com/parents/school-barred-7-year-olds-dreadlocks-changes-dress-code-policy-8C11122821). Instances such as these have led to the drafting of the CROWN Act: Create a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair. It is currently law in seven American states and prohibits discrimination based on hairstyles and hair texture.5 Similar initiatives are needed elsewhere.

Now, as a fourth-year medical student with residency interviews around the corner, I cannot help but ponder how my image will be perceived by potential admissions committees. I’ve read stories of Black physicians who maintained straightened hairstyles until completing residency; only then would they allow themselves to explore natural styles. I’ve heard of candidates who purposefully wore hair extensions on interview day to maintain a professional image. While acknowledging that these are personal choices and not strictly the product of outside influence, we cannot deny that the culture of medicine has contributed to Black trainees’ reluctance to let their hair be natural in professional settings.

Throughout our medical training, we are taught, implicitly and explicitly, to tone down our individuality in favour of adopting a more neutral, standardized image. But this image is the product of a bygone era when physicians were an exclusive group, mostly homogeneous in race and gender. People of colour who have since integrated into the field of medicine feel obligated to divest themselves of their cultural identity so as to adapt to this predominantly White space. Fortunately, a growing number of Black physicians are beginning to change this culture by unapologetically donning their natural hair in the workplace.

As our medical education system shifts toward being more inclusive, the formal policies and unspoken rules that govern the appearance of trainees must be updated accordingly. Drafters of dress codes should be mindful of their potential to perpetuate biases that implicitly centre whiteness, while disproportionately penalizing people of colour. Antidiscrimination policies should consider traits historically associated with race and culture, such as hairstyle and texture, as prohibited grounds of discrimination. It is time for the governing bodies of medicine to redefine professionalism in a way that not only includes but also celebrates the diverse backgrounds, identities and values present among today’s physicians.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Loussouarn G,
    2. El Rawadi C,
    3. Genain G
    . Diversity of hair growth profiles. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44(Suppl 1):6–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wise LA,
    2. Palmer JR,
    3. Reich D,
    4. et al
    . Hair relaxer use and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women. Am J Epidemiol 2012;175:432–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bankhead T,
    2. Johnson T
    . Self-esteem, hair-esteem and Black women with natural hair. Int J Educ Soc Sci 2014;1:92–102.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Osseo-Asare A,
    2. Balasuriya L,
    3. Huot SJ,
    4. et al
    . Minority resident physicians’ views on the role of race/ethnicity in their training experiences in the workplace. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e182723.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    The CROWN Act [main page]. Available: www.thecrownact.com (accessed 2020 July 7).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 193 (7)
CMAJ
Vol. 193, Issue 7
16 Feb 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is this hair professional enough?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Is this hair professional enough?
Samantha Bizimungu
CMAJ Feb 2021, 193 (7) E254-E255; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.201871

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Is this hair professional enough?
Samantha Bizimungu
CMAJ Feb 2021, 193 (7) E254-E255; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.201871
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Holding on
  • Encountering Islamophobia in the medical profession
  • What’s in a name? Identity, it turns out
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Article Types
    • Encounters
  • Topics
    • Gender & health
    • Human rights
    • Medical careers
    • Medical humanities
    • Professional conduct & regulation

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire