Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are point-of-care immunoassays that are moderately sensitive and highly specific
RATs detect SARS-CoV-2 antigens in samples from the upper respiratory tract and provide results in 15–30 minutes. Test sensitivities range from 30% to 80%, and specificities range from 98% to 100%, relative to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).1
RATs adequately identify people who are infectious
RATs can detect infection in people with viral loads that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission, regardless of whether they are symptomatic or not.2 For example, the Panbio RAT is about 97% sensitive in people with high viral loads (RT-PCR amplification cycle threshold needed to detect RNA < 25) and 42% sensitive in those with low viral loads (cycle threshold > 25).3
RATs are useful in screening programs to break chains of transmission
People who have asymptomatic or presymptomatic infections may account for more than half of SARS-CoV-2 transmissions, but are often ineligible for diagnostic testing unless they have been in close contact with a confirmed case.4 Screening programs that use RATs target people who are asymptomatic to rapidly identify those with high viral loads, which is especially important for preventing onward transmission in high-risk and congregate settings.5,6
Pretest probability should guide interpretation of RAT results
For people with higher pretest probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection (e.g., people who are symptomatic or have had recent exposure, or in settings with high prevalence of infection), positive RAT results should be managed as confirmed cases. Results could be falsely negative in people with low viral loads and should be confirmed by RT-PCR. For people with lower pretest probability, positive RAT results should initially be managed as confirmed cases, with results verified by RT-PCR to rule out false-positive results. Negative results in this group could mean either no infection or an infection with a low viral load, so people should continue usual public health measures to avoid acquiring and transmitting infection.
Training test administrators in sample collection and testing procedures improves test accuracy and safety
Proper training in sample collection improves test sensitivity and accuracy. 6 Personnel must also be trained in the use of personal protective equipment and appropriate biosafety to prevent infection while obtaining and handling samples.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Irfan Dhalla for providing thoughtful feedback on earlier versions of this article.
Footnotes
Competing interests: Mel Krajden has received grants paid to his institution from Roche, Hologic and Siemens, outside the submitted work. No other competing interests were declared.
This article has been peer reviewed.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
In this issue
Article tools
Jump to section
- Article
- Rapid antigen tests (RATs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are point-of-care immunoassays that are moderately sensitive and highly specific
- RATs adequately identify people who are infectious
- RATs are useful in screening programs to break chains of transmission
- Pretest probability should guide interpretation of RAT results
- Training test administrators in sample collection and testing procedures improves test accuracy and safety
- Acknowledgments
- Footnotes
- References
- Responses
- Metrics
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.