Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities
Open Access

A unique milestone

Gerald Patrick Ashe
CMAJ March 08, 2021 193 (10) E345-E346; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.202569
Gerald Patrick Ashe
Brockville, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We all mark milestones in our lives: we graduate, we marry, have children, retire.

This week marked a unique milestone in my medical career, a milestone that was unthinkable when I graduated in 1976. Back then, I was a young and idealistic physician, intent on curing illness and saving lives. I never would have predicted where I now find myself, reflecting on the hundredth time that I have provided medical assistance in dying (MAiD) to a suffering patient.

When I began medical practice in 1977, in a small farming community in Prince Edward Island, I discovered the joy of family medicine, including delivering babies, looking after young families and caring for older adults. I soon realized, though, that my ideals of curing illness and saving lives were not always achievable. I witnessed deaths in patients of all ages and from all causes, including suicides, traumatic farm injuries, motor vehicle accidents, cancers and heart disease. I observed — and likely provided — unnecessary treatment that only prolonged the dying. I have unpleasant memories of patients near death with intravenous antibiotics flowing, yet with uncontrolled pain and dyspnea. Opiates were still a feared entity and there was not adequate home care to support death at home. It soon became evident to me that an important part of family practice involved not only helping patients to live and to live well, but also to die and to die well.

Around this time, the palliative care movement started in Canada. In the 1970s, it was in its infancy but thanks to pioneers like Dr. Balfour Mount, there evolved a philosophy in which death was not necessarily the enemy. Acceptance of impending mortality and the avoidance of unnecessary interventions could improve the quality of life — and of death — for those with incurable illness. Protocols were developed to control pain, nausea and shortness of breath. Efforts were made to prepare patients and families for death and to assuage their existential and spiritual fears.

Figure
Image copyright iStock.com/kieferpix. No standalone file use permitted.

This philosophy captivated me. My experiences with dying patients convinced me that Dr. Mount was correct. Hearing him speak so eloquently and with such passion at palliative care conferences further inspired me. I became a “disciple” and was eager to involve other physicians. This was not always easy, as many had difficulty withdrawing treatment and discussing death with patients and their families. Often it was less troublesome to continue “curative” treatment, even though it might have been futile. At this point, the medical world had not yet embraced the concept of a “good death.”

I moved to Brockville, Ontario, in 1983 and was excited to discover that our local hospital had recently established a palliative care program with designated palliative care beds, as well as a community outreach team. I joined the team, which continues to provide exemplary palliative care.

I have cared for hundreds of terminally ill patients, and for the most part they had “good deaths.” The “bad deaths,” be they “bad” because of uncontrolled pain or confusion and delirium, were difficult for patients and families to bear and for caregivers to witness. When we set out on a path with a patient in palliative care and their family, we commit to providing a safe and peaceful journey. We are disappointed when we fail.

In the 1990s, palliative sedation became more common. It allowed for the induction of deep sedation in patients who were suffering intolerably in the last two weeks of their lives. It could take days before they died, but at least it was an improvement over uncontrolled delirium. They died a “natural” death.

Eventually I began to realize that despite our best care and efforts, a small number of patients continued to suffer. Although good palliative care could control their physical suffering, these patients were not willing to tolerate the loss of independence, the overwhelming fatigue, the loss of meaning in their lives, and the loss of enjoyment of food and its resulting cachexia. They did not want to be a burden on their families or society. A few asked if there was something that we could do to expedite their deaths. We could not consider these requests and redoubled our efforts to provide effective palliative care.

Unfortunately, some took matters into their own hands. I have had patients with cancer who took overdoses of medication, and another who died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. We had failed these patients and their families. It caused me to wonder: Was there a better way for these individuals? As a result, I became an advocate for MAiD. Although my passion for palliative care had not diminished, I could not abandon the small number of patients who could not abide continuing to suffer.

After the passage of Bill C-14 in 2016, MAiD became legal. Within a month, a man with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis requested my help. He could not tolerate his loss of independence and of speech and his declining physical abilities. He was fed through a gastric tube and had declined respiratory support. He clearly met all eligibility criteria. I was apprehensive on that last visit to his home, but his grace and gratitude put me at ease. The tranquility of his death, and of all the MAiD deaths I’ve attended, was so reassuring. Four years later, my hundredth patient was a man with metastatic cancer to his cervical spine and cord compression. The other 98 souls suffered from cancer, heart disease, pulmonary disease or degenerative neurologic disease.

In these four years, I have assessed close to 150 patients for eligibility for an assisted death. Some were not eligible. Those who were had access to good palliative care and had loving families and supportive partners. Although the majority chose not to suffer until the end, there were many who ultimately did not choose MAiD, for a variety of reasons. Some lost competence or died during the reflection period. Others never experienced intolerable suffering, often thanks to excellent palliative care. All were appreciative that the option was available to them.

I will always remember these 100 brave and determined people and their families. I am thankful that they let me share with them this intimate and sacred moment. They have taught me about courage, conviction and independence. Their families have taught me about love and loyalty.

We have made great progress in end-of-life care in these past 50 years. There is still much to be done. Good palliative care should be available to all. MAiD is a right of those few who can no longer tolerate suffering. Why can’t MAiD be integrated into all palliative care programs (it would comprise a small part)? My hope is that physicians, both generalists and specialists, will see MAiD as the act of mercy and respect that it truly is. Although only a small number of our patients will request it (1%–2% of all people who die), their voices must be heard and their suffering legitimized.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • This is a true story. Next of kin of depicted patients have given consent.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 193 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 193, Issue 10
8 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A unique milestone
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A unique milestone
Gerald Patrick Ashe
CMAJ Mar 2021, 193 (10) E345-E346; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.202569

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A unique milestone
Gerald Patrick Ashe
CMAJ Mar 2021, 193 (10) E345-E346; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.202569
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Deromanticizing medical assistance in dying
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Deromanticizing medical assistance in dying
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Holding on
  • Encountering Islamophobia in the medical profession
  • What’s in a name? Identity, it turns out
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Article Types
    • Encounters
  • Topics
    • End-of-life care & decisions
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care
    • Medical assistance in dying
    • Medical humanities
    • Palliative medicine

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire