Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Elective egg freezing for age-related fertility decline

Jenna Gale, Aisling A. Clancy and Paul Claman
CMAJ February 10, 2020 192 (6) E142; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.191191
Jenna Gale
Division of Reproductive Medicine (Gale, Claman) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clancy), University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aisling A. Clancy
Division of Reproductive Medicine (Gale, Claman) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clancy), University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Claman
Division of Reproductive Medicine (Gale, Claman) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Clancy), University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Elective egg freezing is a treatment to help patients increase their chance of pregnancy at a later, more advanced age

Elective egg freezing, or oocyte cryopreservation, involves controlled ovarian stimulation, followed by an egg retrieval procedure. Patients considering this treatment are referred to a fertility specialist for evaluation and counselling regarding risks, benefits and alternative options.

Patients aged ≤ 35 years with normal ovarian reserve have the highest chance of later success, but future live birth cannot be guaranteed

Ovarian reserve testing (ultrasound and blood work) assists in helping to predict the number of retrievable eggs and allows counselling of patients at risk of very low egg yield.1 For patients aged 35 years or younger, about 14 mature eggs are needed for an anticipated 80% chance of future live birth, with more eggs required as patients age.2 Multiple egg freezing cycles may be recommended to achieve the desired number of eggs.

The process typically takes 10–14 days

Ovarian stimulation typically involves 8–12 days of injection medications and ultrasound monitoring. Two days later, a 5- to 10-minute ultrasound-guided transvaginal needle aspiration procedure is performed, at which time 1–2 days of rest are required. Eggs are stored at the fertility clinic and can be transferred to another location if needed.

Fees for this elective treatment are not covered by government health insurance

Total costs range from $9000 to $17 000 per cycle (private insurance may cover $3000–$8000 medication costs) with an additional $300–$500 annual storage fee.3 Additional costs are incurred when patients return to use the frozen eggs to cover the thawing, fertilization and subsequent embryo transfer(s).

There is no “expiry date” on frozen eggs

Many patients do not use their frozen eggs. If used, eggs are thawed and fertilized with sperm to create embryos that are transferred into the uterus. Pregnancy rates are tied to the woman’s age at the time of egg freezing. Advanced maternal age is associated with greater risk in pregnancy4 and many clinics have an age limit after which they will not provide embryo transfer treatment.

Footnotes

  • CMAJ Podcasts: author interview at https://soundcloud.com/cmajpodcasts/191191-five

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • CMAJ invites submissions to “Five things to know about …” Submit manuscripts online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmaj

References

  1. ↵
    1. Saumet J,
    2. Petropanagos A,
    3. Buzaglo K,
    4. et al
    . No. 356 — Egg freezing for age-related fertility decline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018;40:356–68.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Goldman RH,
    2. Racowsky C,
    3. Farland LV,
    4. et al
    . Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients. Hum Reprod 2017;32:853–9.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Petropanagos A,
    2. Cattapan A,
    3. Baylis F,
    4. et al
    . Social egg freezing: risk, benefits and other considerations. CMAJ 2015;187:666–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Johnson JA,
    2. Tough S
    SOGC Genetics Committee. Delayed child-bearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:80–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 192 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 192, Issue 6
10 Feb 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Podcast

Subscribe to podcast
Download MP3

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Elective egg freezing for age-related fertility decline
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Elective egg freezing for age-related fertility decline
Jenna Gale, Aisling A. Clancy, Paul Claman
CMAJ Feb 2020, 192 (6) E142; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.191191

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Elective egg freezing for age-related fertility decline
Jenna Gale, Aisling A. Clancy, Paul Claman
CMAJ Feb 2020, 192 (6) E142; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.191191
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Penicillin allergy delabelling of patients at risk of sexually transmitted infections in primary care
  • Phthiriasis palpebrarum
  • Penicillin allergy delabelling in pregnancy
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Article Types
    • Five Things to Know About
  • Topics
    • Reproductive health, infertility & pregnancy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire