Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Physician billing data reveal striking gender pay gap

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ September 08, 2020 192 (36) E1051-E1052; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095894
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

An Ontario Medical Association (OMA) analysis has found a 15.6% unexplained pay gap between female and male physicians.

The analysis, based on billings from doctors to the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, accounted for years in practice, specialty, days worked, and other factors to make an “apples-to-apples” comparison.

The pay gap was biggest in family medicine, at 19%, and smallest in surgical specialties, at about 10%. Gender disparities in billings were also more pronounced in semi-urban areas than in urban and rural areas, and among physicians working under fee-for-service versus alternative payment plans.

According to the report, there are many possible reasons for these disparities, including bias in payment models and fee schedules, and discrimination in referrals and career opportunities.

“A lot of it can be explained by the amount of time that female physicians spend with their patients,” said OMA President Dr. Samantha Hill. Payment models that reward seeing more patients in less time tend to disadvantage female doctors and may undercut the kind of care that Canadians want, Hill said. “If you talk to patients, we hear patients want to spend more time with their physicians.”

Hill noted that female doctors might spend extra time with patients for reasons beyond their control. For example, studies show that patients feel more comfortable asking questions of female doctors versus males.

Meanwhile, doctors may be more likely to refer patients requiring a larger time investment to female colleagues. Hill and other female surgeons at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto have noticed that they tend to receive more “soft referrals” to have conversations with patients than their male peers, who get more requests to perform procedures that pay far better.

Figure1

If you’re a female doctor in Ontario, you’re likely paid less than your male peers.

Image courtesy of iStock.com/Stígur Már Karlsson/Heimsmyndir

According to Dr. Clover Hemans, cochair of OMA’s committee for women, “both in terms of staff and patient expectations, the patients come to us because they see [us] as being more nurturing.”

Female doctors tend to see a higher proportion of female patients, who tend to seek care more often than male patients, Hemans said. For doctors paid based on how many patients they enroll in their practice, those with a higher proportion of female patients often can’t take on as many people overall.

Fee schedules also undervalue services predominantly for women, Hemans said. For example, doctors are paid a premium for patients with heart disease or diabetes, which are more common in men, but not for patients with anxiety, which is more common in women.

Some fee schedule disparities are more overt; Hemans and Hill noted that draining a vulvar abscess pays about half as much as draining a scrotal abscess, despite the procedures involving similar complexity.

Dr. Sharon Bal, the other co-chair of OMA’s committee for women, said the gender pay gap is likely bigger than the data suggest. Their analysis didn’t account for additional pay from leadership roles, where men are overrepresented, and it looked only at billings, not take-home pay. When women take parental leave, they may still receive capitation payments, but that money pays for their replacement and overheads, Bal said.

The report calls on the OMA to advocate for reform to payment schedules, more leadership and mentorship opportunities for women, improved parental benefits, and a campaign to improve pay equity within hospitals and medical schools. In addition, Hill said the profession should consider “moving away from a fee-forservice model entirely.”

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on August 21, 2020

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 192 (36)
CMAJ
Vol. 192, Issue 36
8 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician billing data reveal striking gender pay gap
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician billing data reveal striking gender pay gap
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Sep 2020, 192 (36) E1051-E1052; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095894

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physician billing data reveal striking gender pay gap
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Sep 2020, 192 (36) E1051-E1052; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095894
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unpacking “long COVID”
  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Areas of Focus
    • Health services
  • Topics
    • Women's health (including abortion)
    • Health policy
    • Gender & health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire