Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Should health workers confront patients who they suspect of abusing their partners?

Louise Gagnon
CMAJ August 17, 2020 192 (33) E965-E966; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095889
Louise Gagnon
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

New research from the United States suggests that most young men want their doctors to ask if they’ve been violent in relationships. But Canadian experts caution that intervening with patients who are abusive may endanger their partners.

A study of 916 American men aged 18 to 35 by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that 90% believed that doctors should ask if they had perpetrated intimate partner violence — which the study defined as any degree of physical violence against a spouse or romantic partner. Yet, only 11% had ever been asked the question.

About one in five respondents had been violent with a partner, while more than a quarter had survived abuse themselves. These two groups overlapped — most respondents involved in intimate partner violence identified as both a perpetrator and a survivor. Notably, 84% of men who were violent with a partner still believed doctors should question them.

According to study lead Tova Walsh, “it’s really surprising how many men think their doctors should ask them about domestic violence. My hope is that spreading the word about that would lead clinicians to feel more comfortable in asking.”

Although there is growing recognition in health care that clinicians have a responsibility to address intimate partner violence, most interventions have focused on survivors, and many clinicians remain hesitant to intervene.

Dr. Elise Wright, a psychiatrist at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, said the reasons physicians do not probe further when they suspect domestic violence are myriad.

“Providers cite issues such as their own personal discomfort, a perceived inadequate knowledge base, forgetting to routinely ask, fears of offending patients by questioning, and a lack of patient privacy,” Wright explained at a recent webinar for health workers organized by the University of Toronto. “A lack of appropriate knowledge of referral pathways in the event of a positive screen has also been cited.”

The situation is even more complicated when it comes to intervening with patients who perpetrate abuse.

“I do think it would be helpful to speak with them,” Wright said in response to a question following the webinar. However, “there is a limited evidence base for things like programs to help men [who are most often the perpetrators] to manage anger, and for things like couples counselling.”

Wright also noted that it’s unclear if men believing that doctors should ask about domestic violence “speaks to the fact that they may be willing to engage in some sort of treatment.”

Michelle Bobala, a registered nurse at Women’s College Hospital’s sexual assault and domestic violence centre, cautioned that intervening with people who perpetrate abuse could also put their partners at risk of retaliation.

Figure

Clinicians are often hesitant to address intimate partner violence.

Image courtesy of iStock.com/PeopleImages

“If they have the same [health care] provider, and they get asked [about domestic violence], and they think they have been targeted, you would worry that they would suspect the victim had disclosed something,” Bobala said. “You should really exercise caution.”

Futures Without Violence, an American violence prevention group, advises clinicians to speak with patients one-on-one, emphasize the routine nature of questions about domestic violence, avoid blaming language, and use a calm and direct approach when addressing abuse. The group also suggests a variety of interventions, including recommending a trial separation, referral to domestic violence or substance use programs, and advising patients to remove weapons from their homes.

Tensions rising during the pandemic

Questions about when and how to intervene in intimate partner violence have become more pressing during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

According to Wright, there are concerns that intimate partner violence is on the rise due to couples and families being isolated at home, reduced access to social supports, and economic strain from job losses.

Canadian violence-prevention groups have reported high volumes of calls and website traffic, even as provinces have eased lockdown measures. Yet, intimate partner violence may be underreported because people living with abusive partners may not have the privacy to seek help, Wright said.

Bobala noted that survivors of domestic violence are often escorted by their partner or someone else if they seek medical attention. She suggested that clinicians “find a clever way to separate them for a few minutes,” for example, by asking the patient to step into another room to take height and weight measurements or a urine sample.

Clinicians who have moved to telemedicine appointments can still ask about suspected abuse, but they must ensure that the patient is alone and in a safe place, Bobala said. “Do not make an inquiry if you see or hear others in the background. Follow up in a discrete manner by text or call another time if you cannot be certain the patient is alone.”

Nonverbal signals are helpful in cases where a partner is likely surveilling the patient, Bobala said. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the “Signal for Help” campaign has encouraged survivors of abuse to use a simple hand gesture on video calls to indicate that they need help.

Clinicians should also be prepared to assist patients in their exit strategies. “Be aware of local resources for sexual assault and domestic violence,” Bobala said, noting that they may have to call daily for availability at shelters.

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on July 31, 2020

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 192 (33)
CMAJ
Vol. 192, Issue 33
17 Aug 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should health workers confront patients who they suspect of abusing their partners?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should health workers confront patients who they suspect of abusing their partners?
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Aug 2020, 192 (33) E965-E966; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095889

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Should health workers confront patients who they suspect of abusing their partners?
Louise Gagnon
CMAJ Aug 2020, 192 (33) E965-E966; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095889
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Tensions rising during the pandemic
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Abuse (child, partner, elder)
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care
    • Health services

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire