Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Virtual care is here to stay, but major challenges remain

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ July 27, 2020 192 (30) E868-E869; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095884
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Before the pandemic, Vancouver resident Sarah Hornstein didn’t like the idea of virtual health care. Newly diagnosed with asthma shortly before the shutdown, she worried that virtual care would be “more about efficiency” than quality. “It’s hard enough to get a doctor’s time,” Hornstein says.

But after several virtual care visits, Hornstein says she was “surprised by how well it’s working.” She appreciated that she could go about her day until her doctor called, instead of waiting around if other appointments ran late. And the providers she spoke with answered all her questions, with one appointment lasting half an hour. Although Hornstein says she would still opt for in-person visits “most of the time,” she now prefers phone appointments for exchanging information.

During the pandemic, virtual care went from being extremely rare to “the default,” largely by necessity, says Dr. Ewan Affleck, cochair of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA)’s virtual care task force. According to a Canada Health Infoway survey, more than half of Canadians said their most recent health encounters in April, May and June this year were virtual.

The introduction of fee codes allowing doctors to bill provincial health plans for virtual care removed the main financial barrier to broader uptake by physicians and patients. But other longstanding barriers to virtual care remain.

“The horse has left the barn…”

Health authorities have mostly left doctors to figure out which technologies to use, when to use them, and how to work around licensing and jurisdictional issues.

“The horse has left the barn and we’re scrambling to put on the saddle,” says Dr. Gigi Osler, past president of the CMA and an otolaryngology-head and neck surgeon in Winnipeg. “There is very little governance in this area.”

Some provinces like Nova Scotia stipulated specific platforms to use, while others like Ontario left the choice to physicians. The Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN) recommended technical and security standards as a guide. But in the rush to scale up virtual care during the pandemic, “people had to just get something,” says OTN CEO Dr. Ed Brown. “I hope they’re reasonably secure.”

Meanwhile, medical licensing rules continue to pose a challenge, especially in northern communities, where patients often must access specialist care in other jurisdictions. Some provincial medical regulators relaxed restrictions on virtual care during the pandemic, but licensing requirements still vary across the country. And according to Affleck, who is based in Yellowknife, “non-aligned policy environments” can prevent providers from sharing patient information across jurisdictional boundaries.

Figure

Health authorities have mostly left physicians to figure out how to provide virtual care during the pandemic.

Image courtesy of iStock.com/FG Trade

New clinical challenges

Physicians are also struggling with making clinical decisions when virtual care is the default. Dr. Michelle Cohen, a family and emergency doctor in Brighton, Ont., says she has found it difficult to weigh the risk of missing something important in a virtual visit against the risk of seeing patients in-person and potentially exposing them to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Cohen has tried to talk patients through physical exam manoeuvres, like the ones she would use to diagnose a hernia, but says those attempts have “utterly failed.” In many cases, she sets a reminder to check in with patients a week or two later to see if their symptoms have changed. Often, she ends up seeing those patients in person.

Dr. Ritika Goel, a family doctor in Toronto, says that social and economic factors can also make it difficult to know whether to see a patient virtually. Marginalized patients may not be able to advocate for in-person appointments when they need them, and lower levels of health literacy and mental health issues can impede phone conversations. Many of Goel’s patients haven’t been able to make phone appointments because they may not have access to a charged phone.

While the pandemic has complicated decisions about when to use virtual care, Brown says that physicians can generally rely on the same clinical judgement they use when deciding whether to schedule an appointment with a patient or send them to the emergency department. However, he notes that there are some additional factors to consider. “What’s their cognitive capacity? How much does a virtual appointment help them? Are they going to be able to avoid time off work? Are there language barriers? Are there mobility issues?”

As the pandemic wears on, weighing virtual appointments versus in-person visits is “increasingly becoming intuitive for providers,” says Brown. But in the long term, doctors will likely need additional training in virtual care.

According to Affleck, “there’s not a systematic approach to the integration of virtual care into the curriculum of most medical schools in Canada.” And medical licensing bodies don’t evaluate physician’s clinical judgement regarding virtual care.

Despite these challenges, many physicians and patients are embracing virtual care. Cohen predicts that most follow-up appointments “are probably going to end up being phone calls in the future,” even after physical distancing is no longer necessary.

Osler says that feedback from her patients on the switch to virtual care has been “overwhelmingly positive.” She has found that phone appointments work well for history taking and following up on test results, rather than scheduling inperson appointments that may not be optimally timed. “For my patients, the virtual care often feels more complete to them,” Osler says.

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on July 9, 2020

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 192 (30)
CMAJ
Vol. 192, Issue 30
27 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Virtual care is here to stay, but major challenges remain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Virtual care is here to stay, but major challenges remain
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2020, 192 (30) E868-E869; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095884

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Virtual care is here to stay, but major challenges remain
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2020, 192 (30) E868-E869; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095884
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • “The horse has left the barn…”
    • New clinical challenges
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Caring for refugees and newcomers in the post-COVID-19 era: Evidence review and guidance for FPs and health providers
  • Soigner les refugies et les nouveaux arrivants a lere post-COVID-19: Revue des donnees probantes et conseils pour les MF et les professionnels de la sante
  • Development of a primary care pandemic plan informed by in-depth policy analysis and interviews with family physicians across Canada during COVID-19: a qualitative case study protocol
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What the U.S. overturning Roe v. Wade means for Canada
  • Is one-way masking enough?
  • XE, XD & XF: what to know about the Omicron hybrid variants
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Areas of Focus
    • Health services
  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Health technology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire