Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Letters

Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records

Raymond Simkus
CMAJ May 27, 2019 191 (21) E588; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.71920
Raymond Simkus
Family physician, Brookswood Family Practice, Langley, BC
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

It is great to see all the responses to the editorial by Dr. Persaud in CMAJ.1 My feeling is that rather than choosing a single-vendor solution, the thing to do is to standardize the data elements and the architecture of the records. A lot of work has been done on this by international organizations like Health Level Seven International (HL7) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Canada participates at these meetings, but the challenge seems to be how to get that knowledge to the level of the developers of electronic health records and to the users of these records.

I have been to many meetings related to computer-based health records where no one had heard of ISO 10781, 13606 or 18308. These documents provide extremely detailed information on standards for health information. Physicians, in general, are only interested in having something that works. The problem is that although they may be unhappy with how their system works, they may be unwilling to spend any time informing their vendors about problems. There are many simple things that could be done to reduce some of the stress that these electronic health records are causing, but it seems to take decades to get anything done that is of substance.

A major problem is the organizations that produce the documents that are imported into the physicians’ electronic health records. These organizations are using systems that were developed in the last century, and there seems to be little pressure to get them updated.

I agree that physicians should not have to be involved with the deep-in-the-weeds technical details. However, the developers of electronic health records have not really been involved either. There seems to be a preference to make things up as they go along. There is a need for at least a few physicians to provide guidance on a number of important issues like what a problem list should look like and how it should function, how should laboratory results be displayed and grafted, and how to deal with prescriptions that are written but never filled. These are just a few examples that need to have clinician input. I recognize that these are not simple tasks, as I have witnessed day-long arguments on problem list issues.

I think that the solution does not rest with either a single vendor or multiple vendors. Having switched from 1 vendor to a different vendor, I can say that it was difficult and will become more difficult as more data are accumulated. I believe that the solution is to get agreement on what the architecture for electronic health records should be, with standardized data elements and clinical terminology. A comprehensive and detailed document of specifications was developed in British Columbia, but there has been a great deal of reluctance to incorporate the recommendations into the current electronic health records.2

Solutions to these issues are long overdue. Considering that the major vendors of electronic health records have users across the country, what are our national organizations doing to get things to move forward?

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Ray Simkus has worked on health information standards with Canada Health Infoway, HL7, SNOMED International and ISO. He has worked with several vendors and used various medical software brands in his medical practice. No other competing interests were declared.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Persaud N
    . A national electronic health record for primary care. CMAJ 2019;191:E28–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    EMR-to-EMR data transfer & conversion (E2E-DTC) standard. Part II — Consolidated CDA implementation guide. Vancouver: BC Information Technology Office; 2013. Available: www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/practitioner-pro/pito-e2e-dtc-part2-consolidated-implementation-guide.pdf (accessed 2019 Apr. 16).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 191 (21)
CMAJ
Vol. 191, Issue 21
27 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records
Raymond Simkus
CMAJ May 2019, 191 (21) E588; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.71920

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records
Raymond Simkus
CMAJ May 2019, 191 (21) E588; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.71920
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • A national electronic health record for primary care
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The 5 Ps need an update: toward a comprehensive sexual history
  • Don’t ignore perimenopause
  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire