Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

A national electronic health record for primary care

Nav Persaud
CMAJ January 14, 2019 191 (2) E28-E29; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181647
Nav Persaud
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto; Centre for Urban Health Solutions and Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Canada Health Act states that health care should be portable — but health records are not. Despite billion-dollar efforts to promote information transfers between jurisdictions,1 sharing health information today often requires feeding it through a fax machine or sealing it in an envelope for mailing. Care is frequently based on incomplete information: patients try to remember which vaccines they have received, radiography is repeated because the results are not available, and family doctors attempt to piece together what happened during hospital admissions and emergency department visits.

The good news is that most primary care providers now use an electronic health record. The bad news is there was no coordination in selecting them. Some clinicians have even created their own electronic health record. As a result, doctors now log into a myriad of separate systems for primary care and hospital records, laboratory and imaging results, and prescription documentation — systems that usually cannot connect with one another.

The past decade has seen many reports written about “interoperability,” setting standards so data can be shared between systems, but repeating the buzzword did not bring us actual interoperability. The large number of attempted solutions has become an additional problem. So much for a single health record for each patient.

Rather than adding another layer to an overly complicated system, we should rebuild it from the ground up, starting with primary care records. We should select a single system and make it the national primary care electronic health record. If all primary care providers used it, the billions already spent on electronic health records themselves — or trying to get the different ones to talk to each other — could be spent on improving the one everyone used.

Although switching will be painful, one primary care electronic health record will make apparently insolvable problems solvable. Sharing records among primary care sites would become easier and the creation of similar data sets for research purposes would be an added benefit. Since access to primary care records will enhance care in specialist clinics and hospitals, there will be an impetus for these centres to connect with the new health record and populate it with pertinent data — which in turn will improve care in the primary care setting.

We can learn from large health care systems that have already moved toward a single electronic health record. The US Department of Veterans Affairs implemented a national electronic health record in 1999, and the availability of needed records during clinical encounters was reported in one observational study to increase by 40%.2 Plans were announced last year to drop this tailor-made system and switch to the proprietary system used by the US Department of Defence, as the several hundred million dollars poured into improving interoperability between the 2 systems had failed.3 SingHealth, 1 of 2 health clusters in Singapore, uses a single electronic health record for nearly 4 million annual patient encounters in both hospitals and outpatient clinics.

Whereas some clinicians will be relieved to have an electronic health record chosen for them, others may bristle at a decision affecting daily practice being made by people who are unaware of local nuances. But allowing choice of electronic health record and publicly funding many options has led to a jumble.

Selecting an electronic health record will involve deciding between many proprietary programs and a smaller number of open-source records. The input of clinicians and patients will be critical to this decision — and agreement on a single health record does not preclude customization to meet local needs.

Selecting open-source software may avoid dependence on the owners of a proprietary product, because the source code will remain freely available and any vendor can provide support and customization services to users. Examples of open-source electronic health record software in use currently include OSCAR, developed at McMaster University and widely used in Canada, and OpenEMR, developed through a collaboration in the United States.

Canada Health Infoway, the pan-Canadian institution reporting to provincial and territorial governments that is charged with promoting digital health solutions, should be given the specific mandate to select and improve one electronic health record — with the input of patients and clinicians — that will be used across primary care sites in Canada. Provinces and territories should fund only this electronic health record for primary care. If we are truly committed to improving the health of Canadians, a bold move such as this is needed.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Webster PC
    . E-health progress still poor $2 billion and 14 years later. CMAJ 2015;187:E309–10.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Perlin JB,
    2. Kolodner RM,
    3. Roswell RH
    . The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care 2004;10:828–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs. VA secretary announces decision on next-generation Electronic Health Record. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs; 2017 June 5. Available: www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=2914 (accessed 2018 Dec. 14).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 191 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 191, Issue 2
14 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A national electronic health record for primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A national electronic health record for primary care
Nav Persaud
CMAJ Jan 2019, 191 (2) E28-E29; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181647

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A national electronic health record for primary care
Nav Persaud
CMAJ Jan 2019, 191 (2) E28-E29; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181647
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Single electronic medical record for Canada: a second opinion
  • Interoperability of electronic medical records requires more than just technical understanding
  • Data interoperability is far more valuable and feasible than a single electronic health record
  • Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records
  • Challenges presented by a custodian-based medical record access system
  • One EHR should not rule them all
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Challenges presented by a custodian-based medical record access system
  • One EHR should not rule them all
  • Data interoperability is far more valuable and feasible than a single electronic health record
  • Physicians need to participate in developing standards for electronic health records
  • Interoperability of electronic medical records requires more than just technical understanding
  • Single electronic medical record for Canada: a second opinion
  • The future of electronic medical records in Canada
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • La vaccination contre le SRAS-CoV-2 devrait être obligatoire pour exercer la médecine au Canada
  • Reconstruire de façon plus équitable
  • Contrer les variants plus virulents du SRAS-CoV-2 demandera une réponse plus ingénieuse à la pandémie
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Areas of Focus
    • Health services
  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care
    • Health technology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire