Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

Ableism: the undiagnosed malady afflicting medicine

Heidi L. Janz
CMAJ April 29, 2019 191 (17) E478-E479; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180903
Heidi L. Janz
John Dossetor Health Ethics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Medicine has traditionally been viewed as a benevolent discipline in which every human life is valued equally, without any form of prejudice or discrimination. Although this may remain the ideal to which medicine aspires, the reality is that, as individuals, medical professionals are not immune to the influence of dominant societal understandings of, and attitudes toward, individuals and groups of people deemed to be “others.”

Galli and colleagues observe that “[d]espite their intentions, personal goals and normative expectations, even health professionals are unconscious bearers of implicit social biases that affect the quality of professional interventions.”1 They further contend that “[i]mmediately, and from early life and thereafter, people perceive individuals with disability as ‘vulnerable’ and of low competence, and, accordingly, treat members of this group differently.”1 Consequently, people with disabilities often continue to experience social devaluation on account of their disabilities (i.e., ableism), despite the fact that the last few decades have seen an increased awareness and a decreased social acceptability of discrimination based on other characteristics such as race (i.e., racism) and gender (i.e., sexism). People with disabilities thus remain subjected to ableist attitudes in many sectors, including — often especially — the health care system.2

Disability scholar Fiona Kumari Campbell defines ableism as “a network of beliefs, processes and practices that produces a particular kind of self and body (the corporeal standard) that is projected as the perfect, species-typical and therefore essential and fully human. Disability then, is cast as a diminished state of being human.”3 Campbell delineates an inherent link between this deficit-based construction of disability and a “biomedicalist stance,” which, since the Age of Reason, has “played a critical intervening role in the lives of people with disability and people with anomalous bodies or mentalities. Medicine has operated as the primary paradigm not only for the treatment of disabled bodies but has also shaped the way decision makers, legislators, families and society in general think about and sense disability.”4

Figure

The author, Heidi Janz, is a specialist in disability ethics, a writer and a playwright.

Image courtesy of Heidi Janz.

It is, therefore, both serious and troubling that studies have consistently shown that, as a group, health care professionals tend to underestimate substantially the quality of life of people with disabilities. 5 Indeed, the very notion of “quality of life” as a reliable indicator of the appropriateness or inappropriateness of a medical course of treatment for a person with disabilities is thus deeply problematic. Jeffrey Martin observes that “a major conundrum when doing health related quality of life [HRQL] research is that most measures, including a very popular one (i.e., the SF-36) confound health and function. As a result researchers can erroneously suggest that particular groups (e.g., disability versus non-disability samples) differ in HRQL when they really differ in function.”6 Such erroneous judgments about the quality of life experienced by people with disabilities can result in treatment options for people with disabilities being either limited, or altogether eliminated.7 At the heart of such decisions is what disability scholar Joel Reynolds has termed the “ableist conflation” of disability, suffering and death: “wherever operative, the ableist conflation flattens communication about disability to communication about pain, suffering, hardship, disadvantage, morbidity, and mortality.”8

What makes medical ableism so dangerous and so insidious is that it often presents as “common sense.” James Cherney argues that “ableism is that most insidious form of rhetoric that has become reified and so widely accepted as common sense that it denies its own rhetoricity — it ‘goes without saying.’”9 Within this milieu of “common sense” ableism, people with disabilities are routinely made vulnerable in medical settings. This is because “common sense” ableism in medicine very often results in the application of a utilitarian approach to defining “extraordinary,” “heroic” and “futile” measures that may be employed to preserve or prolong human life.10 The danger that this poses for people with disabilities entering the medical realm is that things that are considered routine parts of daily living within the disability community, such as the use of feeding-tubes and respirators, suddenly become indicators of an unacceptably low quality of life.

What, then, is the best practice for treating medical ableism, given its long-standing entrenchment in medicine and health care? Many disability and disability ethics scholars advocate for the introduction and increased inclusion of the perspectives of people with disabilities into medical and bioethical curricula as a means of combatting medical ableism. Joseph Stramondo argues that “the social identity of disability can structure personal experience so that an individual more easily perceives and reasons about the morally salient features of a situation in which one is trying to protect a disabled person’s autonomy in a context of ableist structural oppression.”11 Thus, exposing medical and bioethics students to the lived experiences of people with disabilities would create opportunities for them to, in the words of Tanya Titchkosky, “reconsider the place and meaning of abnormalcy as an opening on the meaning of normalcy.”12 Consequently, as Tom Shakespeare contends, “undoubtedly, an immersion in the personal testimonies of disabled people and in the empirical evidence of their lives would challenge dominant tragedy tropes and hugely improve the understanding of nondisabled bioethicists.”13

I would extend this argument to include not just bioethicists, but all health care practitioners. Only if and when health care providers, educators and students are routinely and meaningfully exposed to the perspectives of people with disabilities can they develop a consistent proficiency in diagnosing and treating ableism, in their profession generally as well as in their own practice. Only through such a process of transformative education leading to systemic change can health care in Canada be rehabilitated into a safe space for people with disabilities.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Editor’s note: A National Film Board of Canada documentary on the author is available at www.nfb.ca/film/we_regret_to_inform_you.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Galli G,
    2. Lenggenhager B,
    3. Scivoletto G,
    4. et al
    . ‘Don’t look at my wheelchair!’ The plasticity of longlasting prejudice. Med Educ 2015;49:1239–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Du Mont J,
    2. Forte T
    . Perceived discrimination and self-rated health in Canada: an exploratory study. BMC Public Health 2016;16:742–52.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Campbell FK
    . Inciting legal fictions: disability’s date with ontology and the ableist body of the law. Griffith Law Rev 2001;10:42–62.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Campbell FK
    . Medical education and disability studies. J Med Humanit 2009;30:221–35.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kothari S,
    2. Kirschner KL
    . Abandoning the golden rule: the problem with “putting ourselves in the patient’s place”. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13: 68–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Martin JJ
    . People with disabilities and quality of life: the role of physical activity. In: Mitchell L, editor. Physical disabilities: perspectives, risk factors, and quality of Life. New York: Nova Science Publishers;2017:1–15.
  7. ↵
    1. Stienstra D,
    2. Chochinov HM
    . Palliative care for vulnerable populations. Palliat Support Care 2012; 10:37–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Reynolds JM
    . “I’d rather be dead than disabled” — the ableist conflation and the meanings of disability”. Rev Comm 2017;17:149–63.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Cherney JL
    . The rhetoric of ableism. Disabil Studies Quar 2011;31:3. Available: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1665/1606 (Accessed 2018 Oct. 17).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Hansen N,
    2. Janz H
    . The ethics of making space for non-conformist bodies and minds in healthcare. Dev Disabil Bull 2009;37:29–43.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Stramondo JA
    . Why bioethics needs a disability moral psychology. Hastings Cent Rep 2016; 46: 22–30.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Titchkosky T
    . Life with dead metaphors. JLCDS 2015;9:1–16.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Shakespeare T
    . Just what is the disability perspective on disability? Hastings Cent Rep 2016; 46: 31–2.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 191 (17)
CMAJ
Vol. 191, Issue 17
29 Apr 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ableism: the undiagnosed malady afflicting medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ableism: the undiagnosed malady afflicting medicine
Heidi L. Janz
CMAJ Apr 2019, 191 (17) E478-E479; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180903

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ableism: the undiagnosed malady afflicting medicine
Heidi L. Janz
CMAJ Apr 2019, 191 (17) E478-E479; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180903
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Ableism in the medical profession
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The past, present and future of race and colonialism in medicine
  • How a powdered fentanyl program has improved a client’s quality of life
  • Long road to recovery after complications of sickle cell disease
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Sections
    • Medicine & Society
  • Areas of Focus
    • Vulnerable populations
  • Topics
    • Medical education, residency, internship
    • Medical ethics
    • Patient's perspective

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire