Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

When people hear “doctor,” most still picture a man

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ March 11, 2019 191 (10) E295-E296; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5723
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Today a physician is as likely to be female as male, yet most people still picture a doctor as a man. Only 5% of people presume a doctor will be female, according to a recent survey of 4000 Britons conducted by LinkedIn. Among people over age 55, that figure fell to just 2%.

Receptionists, nursery teachers and nurses were the top three titles associated with women, with 63% of Brits presuming a nurse will be female. People were more likely to perceive traditional jobs as gendered and newer roles as more ambiguous. For example, 77% did not associate any gender with the title “search engine optimization specialist.”

According to Dr. Natasha Larmie, a general practitioner in Hertfordshire, the results come as no surprise, even though nearly half of doctors in the United Kingdom are women. “I’ve often had people assume that I am a man when I go by my professional title.”

It’s a common bias, starting in childhood. One study found that seven of 10 primary school students in the UK identify surgeons as men and nurses as women. This may reflect who children see performing these roles. But gender biases tend to stick, even as the demographics of medicine change.

Figure

Gender bias remains rife in medicine despite growing numbers of women.

Image courtesy of jacoblund/iStock

A Harvard study that found people were more likely to associate the name Jonathan with doctoring and Elizabeth with nursing also found that those biases didn’t change after people were told the reverse was true. The stereotype acted as a “mental firewall” that prevented people from updating their perceptions as the facts changed.

Although patients often fare better when they receive care from women doctors, they tend to assume or prefer that doctors are men. One study asked people to choose between a male doctor, a female doctor, or whoever had the most experience, and more than 60% chose the male doctor. Just one in five preferred the most experienced doctor.

Even when women introduce themselves as doctors, they are often mistaken for nurses or other staff, including by their colleagues. On a Reddit thread, some doctors described this happening several times a day. “It gets annoying, but you have to take it in stride or it will build resentment in you,” one posted.

Dr. Julia Files studied the way doctors introduced their colleagues after noticing she was addressed informally when her male peers were not. She found that male physicians mostly introduced each other as “doctor,” but used formal titles less than half the time when introducing female colleagues.

Women of color also report having to prove their medical credentials in situations where white men do not. The case of a flight attendant refusing help from a black female physician during an inflight medical emergency triggered an outpouring of stories from women who were told to step aside because they weren’t recognized as doctors. In some cases, they were at work and wearing a white coat.

Part of the problem may be a lack of women in leadership. In Canada, nearly 60% of students admitted to medical schools are female, and women make up 41% of all physicians. But they face an uphill battle to promotion. Women tend to receive lower-quality feedback that focuses on personality rather than skills. Studies show wide gender disparities in academic rank, funding and publications.

Facing routine sexism from patients and colleagues, even when it doesn’t rise to the level of harassment or assault, takes a toll. Female doctors are more likely to become burned out or depressed than their male peers or women in other fields. According to Dr. Saate Shakil and colleagues, “the impact of a cascade of small injustices that women physicians deal with every day undermines our daily work and collectively sends a demeaning message about our worth in the work place.”

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on Feb. 21, 2019.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 191 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 191, Issue 10
11 Mar 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
When people hear “doctor,” most still picture a man
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
When people hear “doctor,” most still picture a man
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Mar 2019, 191 (10) E295-E296; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5723

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
When people hear “doctor,” most still picture a man
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Mar 2019, 191 (10) E295-E296; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5723
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Sexism and racism in medical care: It depends on the context
  • Sexism in medical care: "Nurse, can you get me another blanket?"
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Gender & health
    • Health policy
    • Health services

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire