Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Ontario doctors angry over government’s proposal for primary care

Brian Owens
CMAJ November 12, 2018 190 (45) E1345-E1346; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5681
Brian Owens
St. Stephen, NB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Primary care physicians reacted with shock and anger when they saw the Ontario government’s final arbitration position on primary care in the new Physician Service Agreement.

The proposal, identical to the one under the previous Liberal government, would require more work for less pay from family doctors. The proposal is “devastating to practitioners’ morale and to primary health care in Ontario,” said Dr. Kati Ivanyi on Twitter. “Seriously contemplating the nearest exit for the first time ever in 25 yr career.”

Also on Twitter, Dr. Scott Wooder said the proposal would result in “A lot less money. A lot more work. A lot more paperwork,” and Dr. Adam Stewart said it “will KILL family medicine in Ontario.”

The government’s proposals for minimum working hours for Family Health Organizations would leave doctors at the one where Stewart works sitting around with nothing to do, he said, because they already balance supply and demand for care. That would cut into the time that some primary care doctors have for other work, such as palliative care or working in hospital emergency rooms. “They won’t be able to do it because the government says they must sit in their office all day,” he said. “The logistics are illogical.”

The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) had asked for a reversal of the 6.7% unilateral fee cut that the government imposed in 2015, and fee increases of 2% per year for the four years of the agreement, after fees had been frozen for the past five years. The government proposed a further two years of fee freezes, with 1.2% increases in the third and fourth years of the agreement, as well as a onetime $715 million signing bonus.

“After the unilateral slashing of fees by 6.7% in 2015 and five years of no raises, it’s disappointing to see the new government revert back to the former government’s punitive arbitration position,” said Dr. Nadia Alam, president of the OMA. “The further cuts this government is seeking will see more doctors working even longer hours, and for less pay. In the meantime, doctors are already going the extra mile to work around hallway medicine and other shortfalls in Ontario’s health care system in order to get the best possible outcomes for their patients.”

The OMA chose to trigger binding arbitration in September after failed negotiations and mediation over a new Physician Service Agreement. The arbitration will take place in two phases. The first will deal with big-picture issues, such as setting fees, determining what the physician service budget will be and whether it will be capped, and how that budget will grow based on demographic factors. The second phase will cover how to allocate that budget within the medical profession.

Figure

There is a new government in Ontario but the contentious relationship with the province’s physicians hasn’t changed.

Image courtesy of stacey_newman/iStock

The process is highly structured. The first phase is set to conclude on Dec. 22, with the primary care section due to be discussed in mid-December. It is unlikely that the government’s unpopular position will survive in its current form. Each side submits its positions and makes arguments to a three-person arbitration board. The board will consider both sides and decide on a final, binding compromise.

“We’re working hard to demonstrate that the government’s position is not only profoundly unfair but is not in the best long-term interests of patients or Ontario’s ability to attract and retain the next generation of physicians,” said Alam.

In a statement, Ontario’s Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care said: “We listened to what doctors have to say, that they want to be partners in creating a patient-centered and sustainable health care system. We have put forward a truly innovative offer that would create significant financial incentives for physicians to drive the responsible change Ontario needs. The OMA has chosen to trigger arbitration. As we work together through this process, the arbitration board will play an important role in achieving a fair agreement.”

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on Oct. 25, 2018.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 190 (45)
CMAJ
Vol. 190, Issue 45
12 Nov 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ontario doctors angry over government’s proposal for primary care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ontario doctors angry over government’s proposal for primary care
Brian Owens
CMAJ Nov 2018, 190 (45) E1345-E1346; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5681

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ontario doctors angry over government’s proposal for primary care
Brian Owens
CMAJ Nov 2018, 190 (45) E1345-E1346; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5681
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire