Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Response to: “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals”

Sanasi Jayawardena and Alexandra A. Majerski
CMAJ June 11, 2018 190 (23) E725; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.69570
Sanasi Jayawardena
MD candidates, class of 2020, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra A. Majerski
MD candidates, class of 2020, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We are writing to respond to Dr. Steven Bodley’s letter, “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals,”1 which was in response to the CMAJ editorial by Dr. Kelsall.2 Since beginning our medical training, we have encountered a variety of viewpoints about medical assistance in dying (MAiD). Although some physicians strongly advocate for increased access to MAiD, many others are not comfortable with the thought of being implicated in, much less performing, this procedure. In our classes, we have been encouraged to make space for the multiple perspectives that exist in our diverse society. We are saddened to see that this inclusivity does not extend to practising physicians, specifically with respect to the protection of their consciences. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario’s effective referral policy for MAiD does not go far enough in protecting the religious freedom of physicians.

According to the college’s policy (no. 4–16) on MAiD, an effective referral is required to be made in “good faith to a non-objecting, available, and accessible physician, nurse practitioner or agency.” Although Dr. Bodley insists that “an effective referral is not synonymous with a direct referral,” this does not change the fact that, regardless of the health care practitioner or agency to whom a physician is sending a referral, he or she is still making a referral. It is unfortunate that the college does not acknowledge that the provision of an “indirect” referral still renders the referring physician complicit. Most other jurisdictions in the world that have legislation on physician-assisted suicide do recognize this and do not demand an effective referral of objecting physicians. The Divisional Court of Ontario acknowledged that the policy breaches the religious freedom of physicians.

Even more unfortunate is that medical students training in Ontario must now seriously consider taking their skills and talents to another province or jurisdiction in which they can practise their vocation in such a way to uphold their integrity.

Clinical encounters with suicidal patients during our psychiatry rotations have helped us to appreciate the sense of intolerable suffering with which some individuals live. We are disturbed by the notion that we may one day have to grapple with deciding which suicidal patients should be provided with suicide prevention and which should be assisted with suicide. This is particularly concerning because the legislation is currently being considered to expand access to mature minors and to patients solely with mental health concerns. However, we are rapidly learning that these experiences and concerns can lead to very inconvenient perspectives. It has been suggested by some that those of us who hold these views should steer clear from choosing specialties that require interaction with older adults who may seek this service. Alternatively, we could have been prevented from entering the medical field altogether.

We hope that going forward, those in positions of power may be reminded that the existence of multiple viewpoints in medicine is not a liability but simply a reflection of the diverse community of physicians in Canada — this is something to be protected, not eliminated.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bodley SC
    . The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals [letter]. CMAJ 2018;190:E724.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Kelsall D
    . Physicians are not solely responsible for ensuring access to medical assistance in dying. CMAJ 2018;190:E181.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 190 (23)
CMAJ
Vol. 190, Issue 23
11 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to: “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response to: “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals”
Sanasi Jayawardena, Alexandra A. Majerski
CMAJ Jun 2018, 190 (23) E725; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.69570

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Response to: “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals”
Sanasi Jayawardena, Alexandra A. Majerski
CMAJ Jun 2018, 190 (23) E725; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.69570
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Virtual care and emergency department use
  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire