Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals

Steven C. Bodley
CMAJ June 11, 2018 190 (23) E724; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.69469
Steven C. Bodley
President, The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) was at the forefront of policy development as the legislation on medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was coming into force. We provided much-needed guidance to the profession on this important issue after consulting broadly with the public and the profession.

In a recent editorial,1 Dr. Kelsall mischaracterized the MAiD discussion as it pertains to the “effective referral” provision of our MAiD policy for doctors who object to MAiD, and misunderstood what constitutes “complicity” when objecting doctors encounter patients seeking help to end their lives.

An effective referral is not synonymous with a direct referral, and there are a number of ways that objecting physicians could discharge their obligations of effective referral without relying on a direct referral, as we have made clear in our MAiD policy’s accompanying fact sheet.2 For example, objecting physicians can make the referral themselves or delegate the task to a staff member or colleague; the physician or a designate can connect the patient with an agency charged with facilitating referrals for the health care service (such as Ontario’s care coordination service for MAiD) and make arrangements for the agency to see that patient; and doctors who work as part of a practice team can establish triage systems that ensure the objecting physician would never have to see a patient seeking MAiD.

Of note is that an effective referral, in any clinical situation, does not guarantee a specific outcome for a patient. To receive MAiD, the patient must be found eligible in accordance with criteria in the Criminal Code by two independent clinicians, the patient must consent to MAiD and all of the safeguards set out in the Criminal Code must be met. The chief goal of our effective referral provision is to help patients find a pathway to pursue their interest in MAiD and to get help in that regard.

It is unfortunate that Dr. Kelsall chose to frame the broader discussion as a scenario of doctors versus patients. The goal of the college’s policy is to respect patients and physicians. It seeks to ensure all patients — including the most vulnerable — have equitable access to available health care services in Ontario, while respecting physicians’ beliefs and religious freedoms.

We are not concerned simply with “the basics of physician professionalism.”1 Our policy is rooted in the core values of the medical profession, such as service, altruism, trustworthiness and compassion, articulated in our Practice Guide.3 Our effective referral provision is in place to ensure that objecting physicians do not abandon their patients and that even the most vulnerable members of society have equitable access to our public health care system. As Dr. Danielle Martin said in an affidavit quoted in the Divisional Court decision, “The need for family physicians to provide patients with information and meaningful referrals is especially important in the Canadian system because many citizens do not have other access points through which to enter the system, or are unaware of what other access points exist. … [T]he geographic and community-based nature of our primary care catchment makes access to care particularly dependent on the consistency of service provided by doctors.”4

Doctors have a fiduciary responsibility to all of their patients no matter where they are in their life cycle, including those who are grievously and irremediably ill and wish to seek assistance in ending their lives. The CPSO was gratified that the court recognized the importance of effective referral for patients.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kelsall D
    . Physicians are not solely responsible for ensuring access to medical assistance in dying. CMAJ 2018;190:E181.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Fact sheet — ensuring access to care: effective referral. Toronto: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario; 2016. Available: www.cpso.on.ca/CPSO/media/documents/Policies/Policy-Items/PAD-Effective-Referral-FactSheet.pdf (accessed 2018 Feb. 21).
  3. ↵
    The practice guide: medical professionalism and college policies. Toronto: The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario; 2007.
  4. ↵The Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 579.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 190 (23)
CMAJ
Vol. 190, Issue 23
11 Jun 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals
Steven C. Bodley
CMAJ Jun 2018, 190 (23) E724; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.69469

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals
Steven C. Bodley
CMAJ Jun 2018, 190 (23) E724; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.69469
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Physicians are not solely responsible for ensuring access to medical assistance in dying
  • Response to: “The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals”
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Response to: "The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario on MAiD referrals"
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Virtual care and emergency department use
  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire