Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Outdated contract for rural doctors is affecting patient care

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ May 14, 2018 190 (19) E605-E606; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5599
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Doctors in rural and northern Ontario say their outdated contract is making it difficult to recruit physicians and find locum doctors, and it’s affecting access to care. The Rural and Northern Physician Group Agreement (RNPGA) was conceived in 1996 to attract doctors to remote communities. There are 37 rural and northern communities funded under the agreement, which applies to areas with seven or fewer physicians.

“There was a huge issue in the mid ’90s with a number of emergency departments in danger of closing because of a lack of physicians,” said Dr. Stephen Cooper, who works under the RNPGA in Little Current, Ontario. The agreement was introduced to bring more income stability to rural practices, where “the volumes tend to be lower but the complexity higher.” In the first decade, the agreement “made a huge difference in recruiting both locums and permanent physicians,” said Cooper, but it no longer appears to be effective. “It’s starting to feel like it did in the early 1990s.”

Cooper thinks the RNPGA needs to be updated to reflect changes in medical practice over the past two decades. In addition, more medical trainees are moving to rural centres for training, which is positive but it takes physicians’ time away from patient care. “It’s not about higher salaries,” he said. “We need funding for more providers.”

There have been minor tweaks to the RNPGA over the years, but “it hasn’t kept up in parallel with all the other changes that happened across the province,” said Dr. Lisa Habermehl, a family physician and chair of the Ontario Medical Association Rural Forum, pointing to the introduction of models such as Family Health Networks and Family Health Organizations in the mid-2000s.

Figure1

Recruiting physicians to rural communities is an ongoing struggle in Canada.

Image courtesy of buzbuzzer/iStock

Emergency and inpatient care are not as adequately remunerated as under more recent team models, said Dr. Peter Hutten-Czapski, who practises in Temiskaming Shores. Payment for locum coverage is actually more generous under the RNPGA than other team-based models. But at $775 for the base daily stipend, it’s still below market rate. That amount doesn’t adequately reimburse doctors for travel time, according to physicians interviewed.

Hutten-Czapski said his community has been trying to fill a position for more than six years. His group just lost another doctor, so they are two short of the six-member team they’re supposed to have. “We are getting a little stressed in terms of the number of patients,” he said. “It means that people are waiting longer. It’s affecting access to care.”

Dr. Sarah Newbery, a family physician in Marathon, said the urban team models have “levelled the playing field in a way that has disadvantaged rural communities,” adding that an uneven playing field is necessary to recruit doctors to demanding practices in geographically isolated areas.

The once-effective RNPGA is in need of an overhaul, said Newbery. “I’m hearing [reluctance] from new grads. Why would they come to Marathon, when they can make just as much and actually have an easier practice lifestyle in an urban setting?”

The majority of the time, rural doctors can’t find a locum to cover for them, said Dr. Andrew Gloster, lead physician at the Red Lake Family Health Team. That means fewer primary care appointments for patients in RNPGA communities. Another problem relates to role splitting. Often, two or three physicians split the role of a single doctor, because their spouses work and live outside the community. But the bonus provided to one full-time doctor can’t be split among more than one doctor, said Gloster.

David Jensen, spokesperson for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, pointed out several advantages the RNPGA has over other group contracts, including the more generous locum support and flexibility for physicians to split a full-time position. Jensen, who provided comment by email, could not say whether the government is open to changing the agreement, given that contract negotiations with the province’s doctors are ongoing.

According to Dr. Shawn Whatley, president of the Ontario Medical Association, the contract hasn’t come up in negotiations, but all primary care models, including the RNPGA, are scheduled to be discussed during the arbitration process with the Ontario government.

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on Apr. 26, 2018.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 190 (19)
CMAJ
Vol. 190, Issue 19
14 May 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outdated contract for rural doctors is affecting patient care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Outdated contract for rural doctors is affecting patient care
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ May 2018, 190 (19) E605-E606; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5599

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Outdated contract for rural doctors is affecting patient care
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ May 2018, 190 (19) E605-E606; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5599
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unpacking “long COVID”
  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical devices
    • Canadian government

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire