Commentary
The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes
Rosemary Morgan, Kate Hawkins and Jamie Lundine
CMAJ April 23, 2018 190 (16) E487-E488; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180188
Rosemary Morgan
Department of International Health (Morgan), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.; Pamoja Communications Ltd. (Hawkins), Argyll and Bute, UK; Gender, Work and Health Research Unit (Lundine), Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
PhDKate Hawkins
Department of International Health (Morgan), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.; Pamoja Communications Ltd. (Hawkins), Argyll and Bute, UK; Gender, Work and Health Research Unit (Lundine), Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MAJamie Lundine
Department of International Health (Morgan), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.; Pamoja Communications Ltd. (Hawkins), Argyll and Bute, UK; Gender, Work and Health Research Unit (Lundine), Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
MScIn this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes
Rosemary Morgan, Kate Hawkins, Jamie Lundine
CMAJ Apr 2018, 190 (16) E487-E488; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180188
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.