Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Ideology versus reality

Michael A. Stanger
CMAJ February 27, 2017 189 (8) E324; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.732504
Michael A. Stanger
Retired orthopedic surgeon, Victoria, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The editorial by Sibbald and Stanbrook1 supports the ideals of the Canada Health Act, one of which is accessibility. In Canada, medical care is not as accessible as it should be. Not having a primary care doctor of one’s own is unacceptable, as are the long wait times to see a specialist, and the even longer wait times for specialized tests and elective surgery. This causes undue suffering for patients.

The system is not supported with enough resources to meet demand. Medical plans provide funding for a far greater scope of care than envisaged by Emmett Hall, whose Royal Commission led to the Canada Health Act of 1984.

In British Columbia, one-quarter ($2.46 billion) of the annual health budget ($9.89 billion) is used to provide care for one percent of the population (the frail and elderly requiring residential care).2

In the face of these staggering costs, and with current fiscal problems, there is no way to provide reasonable access to care without additional funds. Canada will have to either increase taxes or allow patients to augment the funding for care through insurance.

Even idealists among us would not suggest increasing taxes, so additional funding should come from insurance. Those who can afford it should be allowed to provide for their own care — this in addition to the existing health care system as opposed to deducting from it, and insurance programs must ensure that is the case.3 Patients should be allowed to provide for their own well-being if the publicly administered system is failing them.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sibbald B,
    2. Stanbrook MB
    . Canada Health Act needs bite. CMAJ 2016;188:1133.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Setting priorities for the BC health system. BC Ministry of Health; 2014.
  3. ↵
    1. Sekhri N,
    2. Savedoff W
    . Regulating private health insurance to serve the public interest: policy issues for developing countries. Int J Health Plann Manage 2006;21:357–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 8
27 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ideology versus reality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ideology versus reality
Michael A. Stanger
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (8) E324; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.732504

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ideology versus reality
Michael A. Stanger
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (8) E324; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.732504
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Canada Health Act needs bite
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Succinylcholine, malignant hyperthermia and rhabdomyolysis
  • Study authors don’t consider waning SARS-CoV-2 immunity after vaccination in their model
  • The authors respond to criticisms of their model parameters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire