Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Response to “After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results”

Katie J. Sheehan, Boris Sobolev and Pierre Guy; For the Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures
CMAJ February 06, 2017 189 (5) E220; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.732865
Katie J. Sheehan
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Sobolev
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Guy
Department of Orthopedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Lardner and colleagues1 for their interest in our article. Our next step is to explore potential mechanisms for our reported associations.2

We agree that factors of care may help to explain the association between treatment setting and mortality after hip fracture. Indeed, we offered factors related to access (bed occupancy, presence of orthopaedic trauma services, staff and equipment levels) and delivery (surgical volume, treatment style, and prioritization) as potential mechanisms reported in the literature.

Lardner and colleagues1 further suggest procedure time as a potential mechanism that relates both to access and delivery. Patients admitted in the evenings may have to wait longer for their surgery. If their operation is at night, they may receive their surgery from a less experienced surgeon. Further, postoperatively these patients may be transferred to a ward after hours, where there is less available nursing staff to monitor for complications than during daytime hours, or where co-management by a perioperative medical team is not available.3 Yet, it remains unclear whether delayed access and reduced resources following after-hours admissions or procedures increases the risk of death.4–6

The Canadian Collaborative Study on Hip Fractures will explore the effect of after-hours admission time, procedure volume and bed occupancy on risk of death after hip fracture.7 Further, the British Columbia Hip Fracture Redesign Project is collecting prospective data on procedure time to determine the effect of after-hours procedures on outcomes.8 We hope these analyses will shed light on the mechanism underlying our reported association between treatment setting and death. At that time, we may begin to implement and evaluate interventions (such as dedicated daytime orthopaedic trauma rooms) to combat the underlying mechanisms, and hopefully, improve outcomes at all treatment settings for these vulnerable patients.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: For authors’ competing interests, see reference 2.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lardner DR,
    2. Brauer CA,
    3. Harrop AR,
    4. et al
    . After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results [letter]. CMAJ 2017;189:E219.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Sheehan KJ,
    2. Sobolev B,
    3. Guy P,
    4. et al.
    Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures. In-hospital mortality after hip fracture by treatment setting. CMAJ 2016;188:1219–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kates SL,
    2. Mendelson DA,
    3. Friedman SM
    . Co-managed care for fragility hip fractures (Rochester model). Osteoporos Int 2010;21(Suppl 4):S621–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Khan SK,
    2. Jameson SS,
    3. Avery PJ,
    4. et al
    . Does the timing of presentation of neck of femur fractures affect the outcome of surgical intervention. Eur J Emerg Med 2013;20:178–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kristiansen NS,
    2. Kristensen PK,
    3. Nørgård BM,
    4. et al
    . Off-hours admission and quality of hip fracture care: a nationwide cohort study of performance measures and 30-day mortality. Int J Qual Health Care 2016;28:324–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Tracey J,
    2. Forte T,
    3. Fagbemi J,
    4. et al
    . Wait time for hip fracture surgery in Canada. Healthc Q 2007; 10:24–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Evaluating the 48-hour benchmark for surgery: the Canadian Collaborative Study of Hip Fractures. Vancouver: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation. Available: www.c2e2.ca/research/health-services-and-outcomes-research-program/evaluating-48-hour-benchmark-surgery-canadian (accessed 2017 Jan. 13).
  7. ↵
    Hip Fracture Redesign Project. Vancouver: Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. Available: www.hiphealth.ca/research/research-projects/Hip-Fracture-Redesign/Hip-Fracture-Redesign/ (accessed 2017 Jan. 13).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 5
6 Feb 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to “After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response to “After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results”
Katie J. Sheehan, Boris Sobolev, Pierre Guy
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (5) E220; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.732865

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Response to “After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results”
Katie J. Sheehan, Boris Sobolev, Pierre Guy
CMAJ Feb 2017, 189 (5) E220; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.732865
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • After hours surgery and mortality: the potential role of acute care surgery models as a factor accounting for results
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlighting obesity as a risk factor for endometrial cancer
  • Hepatitis B vaccination for Canadian children: time for an adult conversation
  • Codesigning a public health approach to preventing firearm-related suicide deaths with rural communities
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire