Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Editorial

A call for clarity and quality in medical writing

Roger Collier
CMAJ November 20, 2017 189 (46) E1407; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171265
Roger Collier
News Editor (Interim), CMAJ
B.Eng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Words matter in science that matters. Far too often, however, the words in medical literature are chosen and arranged without enough care. This leads to confusing, jargon-filled writing that is difficult to read, even for medical researchers.

Not only is careless writing a barrier to publication, it makes it more difficult for peers to understand and build on other researchers’ work. Poor communication limits the impact of medical research, so clinicians and patients ultimately suffer as well. Vague and ambiguous clinical practice guidelines, for example, have been linked to medical errors and inconsistent interpretation.1

Writing about complex medical research in plain language is challenging. Technical terms, acronyms and jargon, although used too frequently, cannot be avoided entirely. But the benefits — improved knowledge translation, less research waste — are too great for needlessly complicated writing to be accepted as inevitable. Medical educators, academic institutions and health care researchers have a duty to improve the quality of written communication to extend the reach of useful medical knowledge.

Poor writing has always been a problem in medicine. A century-old editorial in CMAJ suggested there is “probably more bad writing in medical journals than in any other kind of periodical.”2 Five decades later, the problem remained. Quality in scientific writing “seems to have no value in a marketplace that prizes the commonplace and accepts the shoddy,” lamented a Canadian researcher in 1964.3

Why does this problem remain so prevalent? As is often the case, it’s mostly a matter of incentives.

Academic institutions generally reward researchers for publishing often, not for writing well. In some cases, there may be a disincentive to writing clearly. Convoluted language disguises trivial science and pedestrian ideas.

Authors also tend to conform to the language they are used to reading in their fields. Many experts suffer from “the curse of knowledge,” which leads to papers full of shorthand and incomplete descriptions. Another problem is that writing comes late in the research process, after months or years of work. Hurry, fatigue, impatience — all are common at this stage, and none make for careful writing.

This is how medical journals end up using many words when one would do. Why say died when you can say experienced a rapidly fatal outcome? This is why polysyllables abound, so we get the words intergenerational, multidimensional, conceptualization, consanguine and conjugality in the same paragraph. Then there are statements so obvious they needn’t exist. Is it really necessary to note that unproductive diagnostic measures are unnecessary?4

What can be done to improve the quality of writing in medicine? Medical schools and graduate programs in science could offer courses on how to explain complex topics in plain language. Physicians are trained to communicate verbally with patients, but rarely receive instruction on how to communicate better in writing. Academic institutions that employ medical researchers could also provide education and resources on effective communication, and find ways to reward scholars who make an effort to bring their work to a wider audience.

Most of the responsibility for improving writing in academic medicine, however, falls upon the physicians and scientists who produce it. “Our indifference to how we share the fruits of our intellectual labors is a betrayal of our calling to enhance the spread of knowledge,” wrote Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker.5

Publications such as CMAJ, although far from perfect, do their best to improve confusing medical writing. Many smaller journals lack the resources to edit intensively. So it is not good enough for researchers to rely on others to make their words comprehensible.

It is beyond the scope of this editorial to provide detailed instructions on how to write well. Researchers would be wise to seek out examples of excellent medical writing and learn by imitation. A good guiding principle: strive to be clear, concise and simple enough so as to not befuddle an intelligent nonexpert.

Research requires incredible amounts of time, effort and money — public money, in many cases. Authors who put little effort into presenting their work clearly are doing a disservice to their profession, to the public, and to themselves.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml

References

  1. ↵
    1. Codish S,
    2. Shiffman R
    . A model of ambiguity and vagueness in clinical practice guideline recommendations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:146–50.
  2. ↵
    Style in medical writing. Can Med Assoc J 1911;1:70–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Basmajian JV
    . Quality in scientific writing. Can Med Assoc J 1964;90:1121–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fred HL,
    2. Scheid M
    . Thirty-three years of dizzy medical writing and editing. Tex Heart Inst J 2016;43:376–80.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Pinker S
    . Why academics stink at writing. The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review. 2014 Sept. 26. Available: http://stevenpinker.com/files/pinker/files/why_academics_stink_at_writing.pdf (accessed 2017 Oct. 10).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (46)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 46
20 Nov 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A call for clarity and quality in medical writing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A call for clarity and quality in medical writing
Roger Collier
CMAJ Nov 2017, 189 (46) E1407; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.171265

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A call for clarity and quality in medical writing
Roger Collier
CMAJ Nov 2017, 189 (46) E1407; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.171265
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Professional writers can help to improve clarity of medical writing
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Professional writers can help to improve clarity of medical writing
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • “Less is better” is the best message when talking to patients about alcohol
  • Without more acute care beds, hospitals are on their own to grapple with emergency department crises
  • Nouvelle politique sur l’utilisation des outils d’intelligence artificielle dans les manuscrits soumis au JAMC
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical education, residency, internship
    • Medical humanities
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire